Home   Bible Studies   Blog   About   Helpful Links   Contact

Posts Tagged ‘Biblical Theology’

Best Blogs Digest: For Busy Disciples (Aug. 2010)

Wednesday, September 1st, 2010

By Greg Gibson

How to Use the Bible Story
“…2. How would you summarize your book’s argument in one sentence?
With biblical theology, we have in Scripture everything we need for effective ministry in the church; without it, vast sections of Scripture are nothing more than moral tales at best and irrelevant history at worst.

3. How would you summarize your book’s argument in one paragraph?
…Too often though, pastors and church leaders approach the OT as not much more than a collection of moral examples and the NT as the story of Jesus and how we get saved. But the Bible is so much more than life’s little ‘answer book’ and the world’s first evangelistic tract. It’s the story of everything; it’s the revelation of God’s grand design to glorify himself through the history of salvation. This means Scripture isn’t a story we turn to in order to answer our questions, but a story we’re in that explains us to ourselves and teaches us the questions we should be asking and the answers we need…

4. You write, ‘I think it’s fair to say that everything in the life and ministry of the local church is affected by a proper use of biblical theology’ (p. 199). How?
Biblical theology places us inside the storyline of Scripture. So good biblical theology is almost always the difference between misapplying and faithfully applying Scripture. For example, should the unemployed, barren, or disabled in your church consider themselves cursed by God, while the rich, fruitful, and strong in your church consider themselves favored? Does God-honoring worship require the use of cymbals and tambourines? Should we baptize infants, and if so, whose? Should the church seek political power and a role in civil law-making? I could go on. The answers to all of these questions, and countless more, aren’t found by simply collecting and comparing all the references in the Bible to childlessness, cymbals, or laws. They’re found by understanding the whole storyline of Scripture and where the Christian and the local church fit into it…” Interview with Michael Lawrence on Biblical Theology and the Church by Michael Lawrence

How Would You Summarize the OT’s Message in One Sentence?
“1. How would you summarize your book’s (Dominion and Dynasty) argument in one sentence?
God created humanity to rule the world in his image, and humanity was dethroned from that rule and will be re-enthroned as kings and queens of creation.” (GG:…through Messiah.) Interview with Stephen Dempster on Old Testament Theology by Andy Naselli

Summary of Hebrews’ Message by Peter O’Brien
“…1. How would you summarize the message of Hebrews?
Hebrews is a “word of exhortation” (Hebrews 13:22) sent as a letter to Christians, probably from a Jewish background, urging them to maintain their confession of Jesus Christ, the Son of God and perfect high priest (3:6, 14; 4:14; 10:23).
Through exposition the author uses the Old Testament to show the Son’s place in God’s saving plan, his superiority to angels (1:5–14), the purpose of the incarnation (2:10–18), the superiority of Jesus’ priesthood (5:1–7:28), and his high priestly offering by which he inaugurated the new covenant (8:1–10:18).
Through exhortation, which includes words of encouragement and stern warnings, as well as positive and negative examples, the author repeatedly urges his listeners to persevere faithfully in order to reach their eternal rest in the heavenly city.

2. Why did the audience of Hebrews need this message?
The members of the community had previously suffered persecution, imprisonment, public abuse, and the loss of their property (10:32–34). Now they were being called upon to endure suffering again.
They had grown weary as believers and were in danger of drifting away or, worse, willfully persisting in sin and rejecting the Son of God. Although the author does not say that they have actually committed apostasy, some are in great danger. In order to prevent such a disaster he addresses his powerful “word of exhortation” to them…” Interview with Peter O’Brien on the Letter to the Hebrews by Peter O’Brien

Pornified or Purified?
“Here’s the point: These two pictures of male sexuality are deliberately intended to drive home the point that every man must decide who he will be, whom he will serve, and how he will love. In the end, a man’s decision about pornography is a decision about his soul, a decision about his marriage, a decision about his wife, and a decision about God. Pornography is a slander against the goodness of God’s creation and a corruption of this good gift God has given his creatures out of his own self-giving love. To abuse this gift is to weaken, not only the institution of marriage, but the fabric of civilization itself. To choose lust over love is to debase humanity and to worship the false god Priapus in the most brazen form of modern idolatry.” Two Pictures: Purified vs Pornified by Al Mohler

The Gospel Nuns
“‘‘Some people come to Italy for an audience with the Pope. As for me, I’d prefer to meet with the Sorelle Evangeliche (Gospel Sisters),’ I declared, entering the home of Cristiana Gavagni and Annamaria Mazzari, a.k.a. the ‘Gospel Nuns.’ Known among evangelicals throughout Italy, these sisters have a ministry of itinerant evangelism in which they encourage congregations to pursue gospel-centered outreach. Their message is simple: ‘Choose Christ and him alone’…By now, Annamaria was ready to leave the Catholic Church. She could no longer celebrate Mass or attend confession, and she had discarded all of her religious paraphernalia such as statues, beads, and clerical attire. (This is evidently when she broke the habit). After 46 years as a nun, she was ready to resign…One thing was left…baptism. On September 25, 2005, Pastors Dick Paul and Sam Wegner baptized them at Bible Christian Church of Florence. Afterward, Cristiana and Annamaria were cut off from fellowship with the sisterhood and alienated from many of their family members. Having served in their order for 102 years combined, they were now on their own for the first time, out from under the protective care of Mother Church. Thankfully, the evangelical church stepped in as Pastor Sam Wegner and the congregation of Bible Christian Church surrounded then with loving support. I asked Cristiana how it felt to undergo baptism knowing that she would face such alienation. She responded without batting an eye, ‘It was joy like I had never felt before!’ Describing the nature of their ministry, Annamaria explained, ‘We visit churches to share our testimony, our love for God’s Word, and the liberation which he has given us in Jesus. It is a privilege to serve the Lord.’” The Gospel Nuns by Chris Castaldo

Interview With the Apostle Paul on the Law
“We have died to the law.
How did we die to the law?
We died to the law through the body of Christ.
For what purpose did we die to the law?
We died to the law so that we would belong to another—to him who has been raised from the dead.
Why did God join us to Christ?
So that we could bear fruit for God.
What kind of fruit will we bear if we are under the law and not united to Christ?
While we were living in the flesh, our sinful passions, aroused by the law, were at work in our members to bear fruit for death.
So we’re not under law?
We are released from the law.
You’re saying we’re dead to the law?
We died to that which held us captive.
What are the results of our death to law?
We now serve in the new way of the Spirit . . .
As opposed to?
. . . the old way of the letter.” An Interview With the Apostle Paul on the Law, Life, and Death by Justin Taylor

Schreiner Answers 40 Questions on the Law
“But if I had to recommend just one book on the topic, it’d be Tom Schreiner’s 40 Questions About Christians and Biblical Law…’Tom provides perhaps the most helpful guide available for 40 of the most difficult questions about Christians and Biblical Law.’ I’ve had an opportunity to read an early draft of the book and would give it my highest recommendation.” Schreiner Answers 40 Questions on Gospel and Law by Justin Taylor

What One Thing Would You Change About Seminary?
“Al Mohler: There is a body of knowledge to be mastered and a set of ministerial skills and practices to be developed, of course, but these do not a minister make. The ministry is a calling, and the most important qualifications for the Christian ministry are spiritual.

Don Carson: I’d make it more integrated.

Jeff Louie: We should teach a course on the understanding and centrality of the gospel to every entering seminarian, then build upon that understanding in the theological, canonical, historical, and practical ministry courses. Too often there is no course on the gospel given in seminary, or it is an elective, or it is a subject relegated to a class on evangelism. This subject should be front and center, and everything else we study should be tied to it and flow from it.

Richard Pratt: The agenda of evangelical seminaries is set primarily by scholars. Professors decide how students will spend their time; they determine students’ priorities; they set the pace. And guess what. Scholars’ agenda seldom match the needs of the church.
Can you imagine what kind of soldiers our nation would have if basic training amounted to reading books, listening to lectures, writing papers, and taking exams? We’d have dead soldiers. The first time a bullet wizzed past their heads on the battlefield, they’d panic. The first explosion they saw would send them running. So, what is basic training for the military? Recruits learn the information they need to know, but this is a relatively small part of their preparation. Most of basic training is devoted to supervised battle simulation. Recruits are put through harrowing emotional and physical stress. They crawl under live bullet fire. They practice hand to hand combat.
If I could wave a magic scepter and change seminary today, I’d turn it into a grueling physical and spiritual experience. I’d find ways to reach academic goals more quickly and effectively and then devote most of the curriculum to supervised battle simulation. I’d put students through endless hours of hands-on service to the sick and dying, physically dangerous evangelism, frequent preaching and teaching the Scriptures, and days on end of fasting and prayer. Seminary would either make them or break them.”

(GG: Jesus’ training of the 12 apostles is a partial model to pastors’ training today. Seminaries tend to over-emphasize something Jesus didn’t: hyper-scholarly details. Jesus emphasized character and ‘how to’ more: faith, love, humility, how to pray, how to evangelize, etc. The Church needs scholars, but scholarship is not a qualification for pastors. Are we making scholars or disciples? Yeah, I know the 2 aren’t mutually exclusive, but what is our emphasis?
I love reading scholars, but never want to preach like most of them write. Good preachers can translate scholar-speak into pew-speak with simple and clear words. Think about this: The smartest Bible teacher who ever lived was able to explain complex doctrinal truths in simple and clear words that even uneducated farmers and fishermen could understand. Go and do likewise.) TGC Asks: What one thing would you change about seminary? by Collin Hansen

Racism Remedy: Justification by Faith
“11.00 a.m. on Sunday morning is the most segregated hour of the American week…I want to suggest that one of the best resources for confronting racism in the Christian church is the Protestant doctrine of justification by faith…justification by faith according to Paul has vertical and horizontal dimensions…While justification by faith certainly answers the question, ‘What must I do to be saved?’ it also answers another question, one seldom asked, ‘Who are the people of God?’… Paul’s formulation of justification by faith took shape in the context of the struggle to legitimize the membership of his Gentile converts in a church under siege from Jewish proselytizers…The horizontal elements of justification by faith are displayed in three key places in Paul’s letters. In Rom. 3.28 Paul states: ‘We reckon a person to be justified by faith without works of law’. Then he asks in Rom. 3.29: ‘Or is God the God of the Jews only? Is he not God of the Gentiles too?’…what is the first implication that Paul draws after this in Eph. 2.11-3.11? Paul gives a majestic discourse about how the dividing wall between Jews and Gentiles has been broken down, how Gentiles attain the citizenship of Israel, and the unity between the races in the new creation that God has ushered in…The argument in Antioch between Paul and Peter described in Gal. 2.11-14 had racial issues at the forefront. Peter ate with Gentiles at the church in Antioch, until certain men from James came. Under duress Peter separated and withdrew from table fellowship with Gentiles…Justification by faith is Paul’s weapon to argue for the unity of the church of Jew and Gentile against those who would divide them, segregate them, or assign some to a second tier status. If we claim to believe and follow what the Apostle Paul taught about justification then: Do we believe that every person is justified by faith in Christ? Or do we believe that God is the God of our race only? Do we believe that we are saved by faith so that the dividing wall between black and white communities has been torn down? Do we walk towards the truth of the gospel concerning the way we treat those of different race, color, and ethnicity at the table of the Lord.
To practice any form of ethnic or racial exclusion means that one either does not understand or does not believe in justification by faith. Let me be clear. The denial of ethic privilege and racial superiority is not merely an implication of justification by faith; rather, it is a core element of the doctrine. They are mutually exclusive because justification constitutes a church of Jew and Gentile, slave and free, male and female, Greek and Barbarian, White and Black, African and Asian. Churches and Christians that practice racial segregation even for pragmatic reasons deny the biblical teaching and the application of the doctrine of justification to the koinonia of the church. Justification is the act whereby God creates a new people, with a new status, in a new covenant, as a foretaste of the new age.” (GG: “Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God” Rom. 15:7) Guest Post: Justification by Faith and Racism by Michael Bird

What the Bible Says About Ministry to the Poor (Summary)
“#1: Don’t Undersell What the Bible Says About the Poor and Social Justice

#2: Don’t Oversell What the Bible Says About the Poor and Social Justice
Just as some Christians are in danger of over-reacting against social justice, other Christians, in an effort be prophetic, run the risk of making the Bible say more about the poor and social justice than it actually does. Here are a few examples of ‘oversell.’

(1) For starters, the alleviation of poverty is simply not the main storyline of Scripture. Some Christians talk like the Bible is almost entirely about the poor, as if the story from Genesis to Revelation is largely the story of God taking the side of the poor in an effort to raise the minimum wage and provide universal health care. As we tried to show earlier, the biblical narrative is chiefly concerned with how a holy God can dwell with an unholy people. Granted, one aspect of living a holy life is treating the poor with compassion and pursuing justice, but this hardly makes poverty the central theme in the Bible. If our story does not center on Jesus Christ, and the story of Jesus Christ does not center on his death and resurrection for sin, we have gotten the story all out of whack.

(2) Likewise, we must remember that the ‘poor’ in Scripture are usually the pious poor. They are the righteous poor, the people of God oppressed by their enemies yet still depending on him to come through on their behalf (see for example Psalm 10; 69; 72; 82). This does not mean “the poor” should be evacuated of any economic component. After all the pious poor are very often the materially poor. But it does mean that the poor God favors are not the slothful poor (Prov. 6:6-11; 2 Thess 3:6-12), nor the disobedient poor (Prov. 30:9), but the humble poor who wait on God (Matthew 5:3; 6:33).

(3) We should note that almost all the references to caring for the poor in the Bible are references to the poor within the covenant community… Christians are enjoined to do good to all people, but the priority is ‘especially to those who are of the household of faith’ (Gal. 6:10).

(4) Justice, as a biblical category, is not synonymous with anything and everything we feel would be good for the world. We are often told that creation care is a justice issue, the gap between rich and poor is a justice issue, advocating for a ‘living wage’ is a justice issue. But the examination of the main social justice texts has shown that justice is a much more prosaic category in the Bible. Doing justice means following the rule of law, showing impartiality, not stealing, not swindling, not taking advantage of the weak because they are too uninformed or unconnected to stop you.” A Brief Wrap Up on The Poor and Social Justice by Kevin DeYoung

Which Motives to Conversion Should Evangelists Use?
“Most of us, I suspect, develop fairly standard ways, one might even say repetitive ways, to appeal to the motivations of our hearers when we preach the gospel. Recently, however, I have wondered if I have erred in this respect—not so much in what I say as in what I never or almost never say…

1. A Survey of Possible Motivations
1.1 Fear
1.2 The Burden of Guilt
1.3 Shame
1.4 The Need for ‘Future Grace’
1.5 The Attractiveness of Truth
1.6 A General, Despairing Sense of Need
1.7 Responding to Grace and Love
1.8 (Hope)

2. Four Theological and Pastoral Reflections on This Survey
2.1 We do not have the right to choose only one of these motivations in people and to appeal to it restrictively.
2.2 On the other hand, we may have the right to emphasize one motivation more than others.
2.3 Nevertheless, the comprehensiveness of our appeal to diverse motivations will reflect the comprehensiveness of our grasp of the gospel.
2.4…failure to cover the sweep of motivations ultimately results in diminishing God.
The point to be made is simple: any failure to appeal to the full range of biblically exemplified and biblically sanctioned motivations not only means that there are some people we are not taking into account, but, more seriously, that there are elements in the character and attributes of God himself that we are almost certainly ignoring.” Pastoral Pensées: Motivations to Appeal to in Our Hearers When We Preach for Conversion by Don Carson

The New Perspective’s False Dichotomies
“Moisés Silva explains why we can be grateful to the “new perspective on Paul: first, for reminding us of what was obvious long before E. P. Sanders’s Paul and Palestinian Judaism came on the scene, namely, that it is quite unfair and inaccurate to paint postbiblical Judaism with the broad, indiscriminate brush of ‘legalism’ and self-righteousness; and second, for helping us to see more clearly that Paul’s overarching interest in Galatians 2-3 was not precisely to expound the doctrine of justification but to address the Jewish-Gentile question in the church and thereby to clarify who are the true descendants of Abraham.
But one exaggeration doesn’t deserve another: But to acknowledge that much is hardly to accept other exaggerated claims—for example, the tendency to seek right-standing with God by human effort was not much of a problem in Judaism (and therefore that such a thing was outside Paul’s purview), or that the doctrine of justification by faith alone, as understood in Protestant theology, does not play a significant role in Galatians 3 (let alone that it was foreign to Pauline thought!).” Gratitude for the New Perspective on Paul but Resistance to Its False Dichotomies by Moises Silva

Blessed Are the Peacemakers
“I would recommend that every church at least be familiar with Peacemaker Ministries and the resources that they offer. I recently had an opportunity to lead a group through their small-group DVD set and study guide, and the feedback was very encouraging, with tangible fruit produced.” Blessed Are the Peacemakers by Justin Taylor

More Christians Than Communists in China?
“No one knows exactly how many Christians there are among China’s population of 1.3 billion. There are an estimated 21 million members of the government sanctioned Three-Self Patriotic movement, but nobody knows how many Protestants worship in unregistered house churches. Some recent surveys have calculated there could be as many as 100 million Chinese Protestants. That would mean that China has more Christians than Communist Party members, which now number 75 million.” NPR on the Chinese Christian Boom by Collin Hansen

Big Picture Preaching: 3 Advantages to Expository Preaching From Long Passages Instead of Short Passages

Monday, October 8th, 2007

By Greg Gibson

Imagine you’re sitting in the church at Rome in the 1st century. You hear a knock on the door. In walks a messenger with a scroll from the Apostle Paul. An elder opens the scroll and reads Rom. 1:1-4, then stops, and preaches for 45 minutes. Finally, he concludes by saying, “We’ll read and study the next few verses next week.”

What’s wrong with this picture? Can you really picture the early church preaching from short passages like that? I think the elders probably read and commented on the whole letter in one message. (In following weeks, they probably also reminded the church of specific passages.)

Here’s something to think about…How many sermons did Jesus take to preach the Sermon on the Mount? (Matt. 5-7). The Upper Room Discourse? (John 13-17). The Olivet Discourse? (Matt. 24-25). He preached those messages in only one sermon each. Then, why do most expository preachers today divide those single sermons into dozens of sermons?

This quote sums-up well the need for Big Picture Preaching…

    “Show How the Text Connects to the Rest of Scripture. One of the biggest problems with preaching today is that the individual texts are often divorced from the whole of Scripture. While we do not neglect the details (e.g., word studies, grammar, syntax, historical setting, individual texts), we must be sure to show how the Bible fits together. The Bible is a story with many books; thus, we must be careful to show how these books and stories all fit together. Richard Lints has listed some helpful steps for examining particular texts within the larger context of Scripture. I would also suggest preparing sermons on larger portions of Scripture, rather than one or two verses. How can we possibly see the big picture if we miss the forest for the trees? The Bible did not come to us in chapters or individual verses, but as whole books. For some reason many pastors think they are treating the text “in-depth” when they spend five years preaching through the book of Matthew or spending five weeks on two verses. I think we should get people to see the big picture by preaching larger portions of Scripture, which will also allow us to get to other books of the Bible during our ministry. I am not suggesting to ignore the details of the text, but simply understand that the Bible is a book of literature and should be read and taught as such (as a book or a whole).” (Chad Knudson, Developing a Biblical-Theological Sermon, The Road to Emmaus blog, 2007.)

Also, The New Dictionary of Biblical Theology warns of overly-detailed, word-by-word expository preaching…

    “Dangers to be avoided…Slow motion biblical theology. Sometimes a preacher preaches a complete sermon on every word of a text, including a complete biblical theology of each word drawn from all its occurrences in Scripture. To do this is to lose the movement and particularity of the text, so that it becomes a peg on which to hang a series of theological sermons. Each word is used as an exercise in biblical theology. William Gurnall’s The Christian in Complete Armour exemplifies this approach.” (P.J.H. Adam, ‘Preaching and Biblical Theology,’ in T. Desmond Alexander, Brian S. Rosner, D.A. Carson, Graeme Goldsworthy: editors, New Dictionary of Biblical Theology, Inter-Varsity Press, 2000.)

Expository preachers have different views of how much detail to include in their sermons…

4 Different Views of How Much Detail
To Include in Expository Preaching

1. Word-by-word
2. Verse-by-verse
3. Passage-by-passage
4. Theme-by-theme

The goal of this blog is to explain why the 4th style, theme-by-theme, expository preaching, should help disciples grow faster. This style may be described by any of the following 3 names…

    1. Big Picture Preaching
    2. Theme-by-Theme Expository Preaching
    3. Expository Preaching From Long Passages

Theme-by-theme, expository preaching should not be confused with most seeker-sensitive style, topical preaching today. Most topical preachers compromise and edit the so-called “negative” parts of God’s Word because they fear men, since they aren’t filled with the Holy Spirit’s boldness. And, they often misinterpret verses by extracting them from their contexts. However, theme-by-theme, expository preaching teaches the whole Bible from beginning to end, with these 5 goals…

5 Goals of Theme-by-Theme, Expository Preaching

1. Explain: What is the text’s context in relation to the whole passage, whole book, and whole Bible (redemptive-historical)?

2. Interpret: What is the meaning of the text?

3. Identify: What are the main theme(s) and sub-theme(s)?

4. Emphasize: Focus on the main theme(s) more than the minor details.

5. Apply: How should we then live?

God has not explicitly spoken about what length of passages we should preach. There are no right and wrong here, but there are better and best. Although I lack any “Thus saith the Lord,” I’m going to try using some common sense to persuade you to try “Big Picture Preaching.”

Before we see the advantages of this style of preaching, let’s answer 3 popular objections against preaching from long passages, instead of short passages…

3 Objections Against Preaching From Long Passages,
Instead of Short Passages

1. “But, verse-by-verse preaching is more in-depth and less shallow, and it contains more meat and less milk.”

Frankly, I find it far more in-depth to grasp God’s unifying, redemptive-historical themes from Genesis - Revelation, like creation - new creation, sin, covenants, salvation, kingdom, temple, rest, etc. And, the milk-meat distinction in Hebrews 5:12ff has nothing to do with explaining every verse. It refers to advancing from basic doctrinal truths like repentance, faith, baptism, etc. to mature truths like apostasy-perseverance.

2. “But, we need extra time to explain the historical-cultural context of the Bible.”

Granted, sometimes we need to reconstruct the historical-cultural context for our listeners. However, do we really need 34 sermons to reconstruct the 1st century, historical-cultural context of the Sermon on the Mount?

3. “But, some literary genres (like teaching passages in Romans) require more time to explain than others (like historical narratives in Joshua.)

True, but do we really need 5 years to explain Romans?

I’ve yet to see any good reason why most expository preachers prefer short passages, instead of long passages. OK, now here are 3 advantages to preaching from long passages, instead of short passages…

3 Advantages to Preaching From Long Passages,
Instead of Short Passages

1. Preaching Longer Passages Helps Disciples Understand More Truths Sooner

Has your church ever lost members who moved out of your area? If so, how many preaching series did they hear before leaving? Only one, a few?

Which disciples do you think will mature sooner? Those who hear…

A. One series for 5-years in Romans?
or
B. Twelve series in 5 years in John, Matthew, Acts, 1 John, Genesis, Hebrews, Romans, and 1 Thes.-2 Thes., and 1 Tim.-Titus?

Remember, Jesus invested 3+ years discipling His apostles. If He were on earth today, can you imagine Him discipling them with 3 years in Romans only? Of course not. He taught them numerous topics during that 3 years: What to believe, how to love God foremost, how to trust God, how to pray, how to evangelize, how to love people, how to talk with people, etc.

2. Preaching Longer Passages Motivates Hearers to Obey by Preserving the Doctrinal Context of the Commands

Most of the commands (imperatives) in the New Testament are given in the context of indicative, doctrinal truths. (Incidentally, that’s why “those who learn little doctrine, grow little.”)

It’s OK to discuss the commands alone for the purpose of defining a theological question in occasional topical preaching. (For instance, the topic, “Which commands must we obey?” is a valid question.) But, for long-term, weekly preaching, preach the commands in their doctrinal contexts.

For example, it’s easier to present our bodies as living sacrifices of worship (Rom. 12-16) when we first understand the gospel of salvation (Rom. 1-11). And, it’s not burdensome to walk worthy of our calling when “every spiritual blessing in Christ” is fresh in our minds (Eph. 1-3.). Also, when we see how we’re raised with Christ (Col. 2:10 - 3:1) we’re motivated to put off anger, rage, malice, slander, and filthy language (Col. 3:8. Burdensome preachers might divide Col. 3:8 into 5 separate sermons, one on each sin.)

3. Preaching Longer Passages Helps Hearers See the Big Picture by Emphasizing the Major Theme(s) Above the Minor Parts

I once read a pastor’s preaching schedule to preach through Romans in ~5 years. I thought to myself, “Talk about missing the forest for the trees!” Maybe that’s how he learned to preach in seminary. But, is that how Christ taught his apostles to preach?

Don Carson warns of preachers missing the forest for the trees (at least in the narratives of the 4 gospels,)

    “The best of Western seminaries and theological colleges reinforce the cultural bent toward the abstract, and fill students’ heads with the importance of grammatical, lexicographical exegesis. Such exegesis is, of course, of enormous importance. But in students who do not have a feel for literature, it can have the unwitting effect of so focusing on the tree, indeed on the third knot of the fourth branch from the bottom of the sixth tree from the left, that the entire forest remains unseen, except perhaps as a vague and ominous challenge. The antidote is to direct attention to the narrative…” (D.A. Carson, The Gospel According to John, Pillar New Testament Commentary, Eerdmans, 1991, pp. 100-101.)

Carson also advises preaching from longer texts (at least in the gospel of John,)

    “The second suggestion is to select a fairly large unit of text as the basis for each sermon. If a preacher takes six weeks to expound the Prologue (1:1-18), and is actually saying anything that has much content, almost inevitably a great deal of later material in John has been dragged in. Far better to deliver one’s soul on the Prologue in one sermon, complete ch. 1 the next week, and proceed at a good pace through the text so that while the slower preacher is polishing closing remarks on 1:51 you are already well into the farewell discourse.” (Carson, op. cit., p. 102)

Instead of spending 5 years in Romans, why can’t we learn the whole book in ~8 messages, something like this?…

    Week 1. Intro., Main Theme: The Gospel of Salvation,
    Sub-Theme: Righteousness by Faith (1:1-17)

    Week 2. Condemned: God’s Righteousness Needed by All Humans (1:18 - 3:20)

    Week 3. Justified: God Righteousness Credited by Faith in Christ (3:21 - 5:21)

    Week 4. Sanctified: God’s Righteousness Progressing in Us (6:1 - 8:15)

    Week 5. Glorified: God’s Righteousness Completed - Our Assurance (8:16-39)

    Week 6. Glorified: God’s Righteousness Completed - Israel’s Future and Christ’s Return (9:1 - 11:36)

    Week 7. God’s Righteousness Applied in the Church and World (12:1 - 15:13)

    Week 8. Conclusion (15:14 - 16:27)

I really enjoy seeing the “big picture.” There’s something awe-inspiring about understanding how each passage relates to the overview of the whole book and the whole Bible. I’d like to hear a preacher develop the theme of Romans as “the gospel of God’s saving righteousness” (Rom. 1:16-17) then relate it back to every passage in future weeks. It’s helpful to hear reviews every week to remind us of the book’s theme.

Divide the Sermon on the Mount Into 34 Sermons?

Here’s a typical, verse-by-verse, expository preaching outline for the Sermon on the Mount divided into 34 sermons…

Week  1. Intro., Main Theme: God’s Righteous Kingdom
Week  2. Spiritual Poverty (5:3)
Week  3. Mourning (5:4)
Week  4. Meekness (5:5)
Week  5. Hungering and Thirsting for Righteousness (5:6)
Week  6. Merciful (5:7)
Week  7. Purity in Heart (5:8)
Week  8. Peacemaking (5:9)
Week  9. Persecution (5:10-12)
Week 10. The Salt of the Earth, and Light of the World (5:13-16)
Week 11. The Law and Prophets Fulfilled, Not Destroyed (5:17-20)
Week 12. Murder and Anger (5:21-26)
Week 13: Adultery (5:27-30)
Week 14. Divorce (5:31-32)
Week 15. Oaths (5:33-37)
Week 16. Vengeance (5:38-42)
Week 17. Love your Enemies (5:43-48)
Week 18. Giving (6:1-4)
Week 19. Intro. to Prayer (6:5-8)
Week 20. Prayer: Our Father in Heaven (6:9)
Week 21. Prayer: Your Kingdom Come (6:10)
Week 22. Prayer: Give Us Our Daily Bread (6:11)
Week 23. Prayer: Forgive Us Our Debts (6:12, 14-15)
Week 24. Prayer: Do Not Lead Us Into Temptation (6:13)
Week 25. Fasting (6:16-18)
Week 26. Materialism: Your Treasure Follows Your Heart (6:19-21)
Week 27. Materialism: The Eye Is the Lamp of the Body (6:22-23)
Week 28. Materialism: You Cannot Serve God and Money (6:24)
Week 29. Materialism: Do Not Worry (6:25-34)
Week 30. Judging (7:1-6)
Week 31. Perseverance in Prayer (7:7-11)
Week 32. The Golden Rule (7:12)
Week 33. False Prophets (7:13-20)
Week 34. Obedience and Lordship (7:21-29)

Personally, I find that style of preaching rather burdensome and fragmented with it’s micro-focus on the details, instead of the major themes and sub-themes. Notice that by week 34, the main theme (God’s righteous kingdom) was long forgotten 33 weeks ago. Why must we change Christ’s 15-minute sermon into 26 hours of sermons?

Why can’t we communicate the whole message of the Sermon on the Mount in ~6 sermons, something like this?…

    Week 1. Intro., Main Theme: God’s Righteous Kingdom, and Character (5:1-16)

    Week 2. Scripture in God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    The Law and Prophets Fulfilled, Not Destroyed (5:17-48)

    Week 3. Sincere Religion in God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    Giving, Praying, and Fasting (6:1-18)

    Week 4. Material Things in God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    God Will Provide, So Don’t Worry (6:19-34)

    Week 5. Judging in God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    Judging, Praying, and the Golden Rule (7:1-12)

    Week 6. Entering God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    Beware of False Prophets (7:13-29)

(Or, if a preacher wanted to preach the whole Sermon on the Mount in only one message like Jesus did, I couldn’t fault him.)

One famous preacher who preached from longer passages was the radio preacher J. Vernon McGee. By the way, he had some of the best conversion testimonies I’ve ever heard. It sounded like the Lord was really using him to lead sinners to Christ.

Emphasize the Major Themes More Than the Minor Details

McGee preached through the whole Bible in 5 years, which may be too fast or slow for you. But in general, I think he had the right idea to major on the majors, and minor on the minors. Good preachers identify the text’s main theme, and focus on it more than the peripheral details.

I wonder, where did we get this idea to preach mostly from short passages? Could it be some extra baggage leftover from the Reformers or Puritans? (Perhaps a church historian can answer that question?)

Well, those are just some of my uninspired, personal preferences about preaching.

Why Not Try “Big Picture Preaching?”

Can I challenge you? Why not pray and ask the Lord if you should try “Big Picture Preaching,” theme-by-theme through one whole book? Then ask your audience afterward which style they prefer, preaching from short passages or long passages? What have you got to lose? (Also, please share your experience with me.)

See another study on preaching from JesusSaidFollowMe:

“5 Types of Sermons” A chart including verse-quoting, topical, expository, and redemptive-historical sermons.