Home   Bible Studies   Blog   About   Helpful Links   Contact

“Born Again Into New Life With Christ” (Sermon Notes)

February 3rd, 2010

Intro: Why do so many converts fall away? Why are there so many hypocrites in churches? Because they were never really born again. Many people think born again Christians are no different than non-born again sinners. But they’re confused what it means to be born again.

Jesus said to Nicodemus, a religious Pharisee, ‘”I tell you the truth, unless a man is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God (heaven)…unless a man is born of water and the Spirit, he cannot enter the kingdom of God (heaven)…You must be born again” (Jn. 3:3-7).

Preview:
1. What Does Born Again Mean? 5 Misunderstandings
2. Why Do I Need to Be Born Again? 7 Reasons
3. What Is it Like to Be Born Again? 6 Pictures
4. How Can I Know if I’m Born Again? 5 Signs
5. How Can I Be Born Again? Hear the Good News

What Does Born Again Mean?
5 Misunderstandings

1. “I got baptized and joined a ‘born again church.” (But churches have hypocrites.)

2. “I had an emotional, religious experience.” (But Muslims have emotional, rel. exp.)

3. “I prayed a sinner’s prayer.” (But that wasn’t invented until the 19th century.)

4. “I believe Bible doctrine.” (But demons believe some doctrinal truths.)

5. “I changed from sinning to morality.” (But some alcoholics change without Christ. Trading one sin for another. Proud, self-righteous Pharisees. But when God gives new birth, He changes us from sin negatively to Christ positively: Treasuring Him, loving Him, fellowshipping with Him, worshiping Him, and obeying Him.)

Notice above, “I did…” But being born again is not what you do. It’s what God does to you. Example: You didn’t ask your parents to conceive you. They decided to conceive you.

Definition of born again: The Holy Spirit miraculously washes and changes us by giving new life, new understanding, new desires, and new power.

    “he saved us not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth and renewal by the Holy Spirit” (Tit. 3:5).

What are we born into? We’re born into “life” (eternal life), united with Christ in His resurrection life…

    “God has given us eternal life, and this life is in his Son. He who has the Son has life; he who does not have the Son of God does not have life” (1 Jn. 5:11-12).

    “just as Christ was raised from the dead through the glory of the Father, we too may live a new life. If we have been united with him in his death, we will certainly also be united with him in his resurrection…Now if we died with Christ we believe that we will also live with him” (Rom. 6:4-5, 8, 11).

That’s why “born again” means we’re born into new life with Christ.

Why Do I Need to Be Born Again?
7 Reasons

1. Humans are spiritually dead, needing resurrection.

    “As for you, you were dead in your transgressions and sins, in which you used to live when you followed the ways of this world and of the ruler of the kingdom of the air, the spirit who is now at work in those who are disobedient. All of us also lived among them at one time, (satisfying) the (lusts) of our sinful nature and following its desires and thoughts. Like the rest, we were by nature objects of wrath. But because of his great love for us, God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in (sins)” (Eph. 2:1-2).

Example: Preaching the good news to dead bodies in the cemetery.

2. Humans love darkness, and hate the light, needing new desires.

    “Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed” (Jn. 3:19-20).

Example: Do you prefer to eat garlic or chocolate? Do you prefer sin or Christ?

3. Humans each have a hard heart, needing a new heart.

    “I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh” (Ezek. 36:26).

    “you must no longer live as the Gentiles do, in the futility of their thinking. They are darkened in their understanding and separated from the life of God because of the ignorance that is in them due to the hardening of their hearts. Having lost all sensitivity, they have given themselves over to sensuality so as to indulge in every kind of impurity, with a continual lust for more” (Eph. 4:17-19).

Example: Heart attack patient. Is your heart hard or soft toward Christ?

4. Humans can’t understand spiritual truth, needing new understanding.

    “The man without the Spirit does not accept the things that come from the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him, and he cannot understand them, because they are spiritually discerned” (1 Cor. 2:14).

Example: Rocket science.

5. Humans are slaves to sin and Satan, needing to be set free.

    “Jesus replied, ‘I tell you the truth, everyone who sins is a slave to sin.” (Jn. 8:34).

    “The Lord’s servant…Those who oppose him he must gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth, and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will” (2 Tim. 2:24-26).

6. Humans can’t come to Christ, call Him Lord, or obey Him, needing new power.

    “No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him” (Jn. 6:44).

    “no one can say, ‘Jesus is Lord,’ except by the Holy Spirit” (1 Cor. 12:3).

    “the sinful mind is hostile to God. It does not submit to God’s law, nor can it do so. Those controlled by the sinful nature cannot please God” (Rom. 8:7-8).

7. Humans are blind to the glory of Christ, needing new sight

    “The god of this age (Satan) has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the (good news) of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God” (2 Cor. 4:4).

“OK, God says I need to be born again. But what does it mean to be born again?”

What Is it Like to Be Born Again?
6 Pictures

The Bible contains at least 6 pictures (metaphors) of how God radically changes us.

1. New birth (synonyms: born again, born of God, born of the Spirit, and regeneration)

    “In his great mercy he has given us new birth into a living hope through the resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead” (1 Pet. 1:3).

    “everyone who does what is right has been born of him” (1 Jn. 2:29; cf. Jn. 3:5-8).

    “he saved us not because of righteous things we had done, but because of his mercy. He saved us through the washing of rebirth (Greek: regeneration) and renewal by the Holy Spirit” (Tit. 3:5).

The big picture: God’s goals for history include a born again universe, with a born again earth, filled with born again people…

    “Jesus said to them, ‘I tell you the truth, at the renewal (Greek: regeneration) of all things, when the Son of Man sits on his glorious throne, you who have followed me will also sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel” (Mt. 19.:28).

2. Born Again Is Like a New Creation

    “if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation; the old has gone, the new has come” (2 Cor. 5:17).

    “Neither circumcision nor uncircumcision means anything; what counts is a new creation” (Gal. 6:15).

3. Born Again Is Like Resurrection From the Dead

    “God, who is rich in mercy, made us alive with Christ even when we were dead in (sins) – it is by grace you have been saved. And God raised us up with Christ” (Eph. 2:5-6).

    “Since then you have been raised with Christ, set your hearts on things above, where Christ is seated at the right hand of God” (Col. 3:1; cf. Rom. 6:4-5).

4. Born Again Is Like a Heart Transplant

    “I will give you a new heart and put a new spirit in you; I will remove from you your heart of stone and give you a heart of flesh. And I will put my Spirit in you and move you to follow my commands and be careful to keep my laws” (Ezek. 36:26-27).

5. Born Again Is Like Circumcision of the Heart

    “In him you were also circumcised, in the putting off of the sinful nature, not with a circumcision done by the hands of men but with the circumcision done by Christ” (Col. 2:11-13).

    “The LORD your God will circumcise your hearts and the hearts of your descendants, so that you may love him with all your heart and with all your soul and live” (Deut. 30:6).

6. Born Again Is Like Being Healed From Blindness

    “The god of this age (Satan) has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God…For God, who said, ‘Let light shine out of darkness, made his light shine in our hearts to give us the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Christ” (2 Cor. 4:4-6).

How Can I Know if I’m Born Again?
5 Signs

1. Born Again People Believe in Jesus

    “Yet to all who received him, to those who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God - children born not of natural descent, nor of human decision or a husband’s will, but born of God” (Jn. 1:12-13; cf. 1 Jn. 5:1; Eph. 2:8-9).

Faith in Jesus Christ alone, not self, Mary, Church, etc.

2. Born Again People Stop Continual Sinning, and Start Doing Right

    “If you know that he is righteous, you know that everyone who does what is right has been born of him” (1 Jn. 2:29).

    “No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God” (1 Jn. 3:9).

    “We know that anyone born of God does not continue to sin, the one who was born of God keeps him safe, and the evil one does not touch him” (1 Jn. 5:18).

Gradual, progressive growth, not sinless perfectionism. Example: Person who practiced lying for 50 years receives new birth.

null

3. Born Again People Overcome the World’s Ways

    “For everything in the world – the desires of sinful man, the lust of his eyes and the boasting of what he has and does – comes not from the Father but from the world…for everyone born of God has overcome the world. This is the victory that has overcome the world, even our faith” (1 Jn. 2:15-16, 5:4).

4. Born Again People Love Their Christian Brothers

    “We know that we have passed from death to life, because we love our brothers. Anyone who does not love remains in death” (1 Jn. 3:14).

    “Dear friends, let us love one another, for love comes from God. Everyone who loves has been born of God and knows God. Whoever does not love does not know God, because God is love” (1 Jn. 4:7-8).

Who are you more comfortable with: Sinners or born again, Christ-lovers?

5. Born Again People Love God With All Their Heart

    “The LORD your God will circumcise your hearts and the hearts of your descendants, so that you may love him with all your heart and with all your soul and live” (Deut. 30:6).

We’re born again into new life with Christ.

How Can I Be Born Again?
Through Hearing the Good News About Jesus

In the past, I didn’t understand, in John 3, why Jesus started explaining to Nicodemus “you must be born again,” then changed the topic to the good news. Now I understand: Because the way to be born again is by hearing the good news.

In John 3:3-7, Jesus explains 3 times to Nicodemus about being born again. In 3:9, Nicodemus says, “How?” Then in 3:13-21, Jesus answers by telling the good news about Himself.

    “since you have been born again, not of perishable seed, but of imperishable, through the living and lasting word of God…but the word of the Lord remains forever. And this word is the (good news) that was preached to you” (1 Pet. 1:23-25, ESV).

    “He chose to give us birth through the word of truth, that we might be a kind of first harvest of all he created” (Jas. 1:18).

Do you need to be born again by God? Understand the good news about Jesus. Evangelists: Do you want to help others be born again? Tell them the good news about Jesus.

Christian: Be what you are. Live like you’ve been born again. What does the born again life look like?

    “put on the new self, created to be like God in true righteousness and holiness. Therefore…” (Eph. 4:24 - 6:18).

    “count yourselves dead to sin but alive to God in Christ Jesus. Therefore do not let sin reign in your mortal body so that you obey its evil desires. Do not offer the parts of your body to sin, as instruments of wickedness, but rather offer yourselves to God, as hose who have been brought from death to life; and offer the parts of your body to him as instruments of righteousness” (Rom. 6:4, 11-13).

Now do you understand why so many converts fall away, and why there are so many hypocrites in churches? Because they’ve never really been born again.

We’re born again into new life with Christ.

Recommended source: Finally Alive by John Piper

Best Blogs Digest - Jan. 2010

February 1st, 2010

By Greg Gibson

Prevent Divorce by Believing the Gospel
“I once confronted a ‘Christian’ couple who were getting a divorce with this: Have you ever considered being Christlike and forgiving your spouse? But you don’t know what they have done! What about not being a unmerciful servant and forgiving the smaller debt of your spouse in light of the insurmountable debt you had cancelled in Christ on your behalf? But you just do not know Mike! How about expressing your new nature in Christ? What about the love of God poured into your heart through the Holy Spirit that was given to us? What about the new heart? What about the circumcised heart? What about love, joy patience, goodness, gentleness…etc. Why is your supposedly circumcised heart so hard? Why can you not forgive and allow Christ to do a miracle in your life/marriage? Why won’t you die to yourself? You can’t express the nature of Christ towards your spouse?…Why is that? I have a very good idea. We don’t believe the Gospel. Thats it. Our churches are packed full of people who do not believe the Gospel…If you can’t do that a home, you definitely can’t do that in the church.” Divorce and the Gospel by Lionel Woods

How to Live With an Ugly Wife
“It is said that she never provided him a sit-down meal at their home…When he returned home at night, he was not able to be in the same room with his wife because he would get a tongue-lashing, so he went to his study. But his wife controlled the coal bin and the oil for the lamp, allowing him no fire to warm himself or oil to light his lamp…Once, when the local Presbyterian pastors were gathered, a toast was offered for the wives of the pastors. The man offering the toast turned to Fraser and said, probably with a knowing smile, ‘You’ll want to offer a toast to your wife as well, James?’ “So I will and so I should,’ said Fraser. ‘For my wife has been better to me than all of yours put together!’ ‘How so?’ they asked, with their mouths agape. ‘My wife has driven me to my knees seven times a day, and that is more than any of your wives have done for you!’” Making the Best of an Ugly Wife by Jim Eliff

God Is Saving Thousands of Muslims
“Many Muslims are hungry for the gospel and thousands are coming to Christ every month. In the most recent issue of Mission Frontiers, David Taylor describes a few of these developments: In Iran, a strong underground church movement continues to emerge with thousands of house fellowships multiplying throughout the country. Surveys in the country indicate that Christian satellite broadcasting in Farsi, which began in the year 2000, is being viewed by well over half the population. Equally impressive are the results of radio and satellite broadcasting throughout the Arab world. One ministry, SAT7, has a regular audience of 8.5 million people. In North Africa, the Berbers are responding to the gospel in massive numbers, with one movement among the Kabyle encompassing several hundred thousand believers.” Open Doors in the Muslim World by Mark Rogers

The 50 Worst Countries for Christian Persecution
“The World Watch List (WWL) is a ranking of 50 countries where persecution of Christians for religious reasons is worst.”
1. North Korea
2. Iran
3. Saudi Arabia
4. Somalia
5. Maldives
World Watch List by Open Doors

Adding Jesus, Subtracting Idols
“Accepting Jesus” is not just adding Jesus. It is also subtracting the idols. What does it mean to “accept Jesus”? by Ray Ortlund

How to Become a Liberal Pastor by Seeking the Praise of Men
“Other pastors, having started as evangelicals, become liberal. It’s not that they begin to deny the Formula of Chalcedon or the Nicene Creed. It’s not that they reject the bodily resurrection of Christ or the virgin birth. It’s simply that, over the course of their ministry, sound doctrine increasingly takes a back seat to effective practice and the demands of a growing budget. Hard truths are replaced by happy thoughts, tips for a successful life, and programs designed to attract crowds whose content is devoted to making those crowds feel loved and accepted…No, I’m a pastor who loves Jesus because he’s God Incarnate and who loves the gospel because it’s true, regardless of how my life turns out. But I’m also a pastor at risk of becoming a liberal, because I don’t just love God. I also love the sheep. And I love myself. And it’s those two loves, wrongly focused, that tempt me down a gospel-denying path. LOVING THE SHEEP MORE THAN THE GOOD SHEPHERD” How to Become a Liberal Without Attending Harvard Divinity School by Michael Lawrence of 9Marks

Preaching Is Counseling
“What is interesting is that Scripture says very little about the kind of one-to-one application of the Word which biblical counseling represents; rather, the focus in the New Testament (and, indeed, in the Old) is upon the Word of God coming to the people as a whole and impacting the community of believers as a whole…does the rise in biblical counseling, and the growth in the number of biblical counselors, signal a crisis in confidence, not simply in the pulpit, but in the Word of God to achieve its purpose? Now, do not misunderstand me: I am not saying that counseling has no place, nor small group; but surely, if the biblical pattern is representative of healthy church life, then 95 percent of the problems addressed by counseling should actually be addressed and solved by simply proclaiming the perennial Word of God. Is it perhaps the case that fewer people would need counseling if more people actually listened prayerfully to what their pastors were telling them from the pulpit every Sunday morning?” The Therapy of the Word by Carl Trueman

Book Review: Depression, A Stubborn Darkness by Ed Welch
“There are three fundamental failures in Welch’s approach to depression. The first is that Welch does not seem to understand what depression is…The second failure is Welch’s misunderstanding of what causes depression…The third failure of the book should then be obvious. With no fundamental understanding of what depression is, or what causes it, we could hardly expect to find real answers or solutions and Welch offers none.” Book Review: Depression, A Stubborn Darkness by Donn Arms

55 Questions for Prospective Pastors
“It is not uncommon for a pastor to be opposed by the very people who at first enthusiastically promoted him. Why? Often it is because only surface communication took place between the potential pastor and the congregation before he assumed his position in the church. In our day it is possible for a pastor to be chosen for a church with almost no serious questions being asked, much less any doctrinal questions. This should never be the case. We suggest that churches seek the most complete dialogue possible about matters of doctrine, practice, and lifestyle. If the church fails to do so, the prospective pastor should call for it. This procedure protects both pastor and church.” Questions for a Prospective Pastor by Jim Eliff and Don Whitney

Outline of Packer’s “Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God”
“The aim is to dispel the suspicion that belief in the absolute sovereignty of God hinders evangelism and to show that it actually strengthens evangelism…The book divides logically into four chapters. (See the outline of the book below.)” Summary and Outline of J. I. Packer’s “Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God” by Andy Naselli

Finding Christ in the Pentatech
“To all pastors and serious readers of the Old Testament—geek, uber geek, under geek, no geek—if you graduated from high school and know the word meaning, sell your latest Piper or Driscoll book and buy Sailhamer,” Piper blogged. “There is nothing like it. It will rock your world. You will never read the Pentateuch the same again.”…Backed by these endorsements, Sailhamer’s 610-page tome on the Bible’s first five books briefly broke into the top 100 in Amazon.com’s sales rankings…I take the view that the whole of the Pentateuch is about Christ, but that doesn’t mean that Christ is in the whole Pentateuch. Finding Christ in the Pentateuch means learning to see him when he is there rather than trying to see when he is not there. I like to tell my students that we don’t need to spiritualize the Old Testament to find Christ, but we do need to read it with spiritual eyes…I’ve found that if you show someone that Christ is really there in the Pentateuch and the Old Testament, they will come back to see more—not merely because they have come to revere the Pentateuch as a foundational book, but more importantly because they want to see more of Jesus…All the evangelism we read about in the book of Acts was the result of the gospel they proclaimed from the pages of the “Old Testament.” Finding Meaning in the Pentateuch by Colin Hansen (HT: JT)

An Inconsistent Postmodern Architect
“He said, ‘This is America’s first postmodern building.’ I was startled for a moment and I said, ‘What is a postmodern building?’ He said, ‘Well, the architect said that he designed this building with no design in mind. When the architect was asked, ‘Why?’ he said, ‘If life itself is capricious, why should our buildings have any design and any meaning?’ So he has pillars that have no purpose. He has stairways that go nowhere. He has a senseless building built and somebody has paid for it.’ I said, ‘So his argument was that if life has no purpose and design, why should the building have any design?’ He said, ‘That is correct.’ I said, ‘Did he do the same with the foundation?’ All of a sudden there was silence.” Postmodern Architecture by Ravi Zacharias via Justin Taylor

Edited 2/3/10

Best Blogs Digest - December 2009

December 31st, 2009

By Greg Gibson

Calvinist Pharisees
(GG: Beware of sanctification by theology alone.) “Here’s the first reason I’m a Pharisee and Calvinist, or, one reason why those two things happen together far more often than they should. The Pharisee and the Calvinist are both exacting persons. They care about precision, about ‘getting things right.’ They care about the letter because each believes getting the letter correct is important. And it is. So, there is this ‘bent’ toward intellectual things. There is this tendency to live in our heads. And when that meets with a theological tradition as rich and robust as the Reformed tradition, sparks fly–in our heads. Add to that a pinch of argumentative spirit and out comes the Pharisee. But you know what’s lost? The spirit, or the Spirit…But here’s the bottom line: As long as my inclination toward detail ends with “getting it right” and not with getting more of Jesus, I’m going to be a Pharisee. Our theology doesn’t keep us humble. Jesus keeps us humble. I think there are a lot of Calvinist Pharisees out there, like me, who push deeper into the theology trusting the next truth to abase them before God. But we keep getting “puffed up” instead. Why? We settle for knowing more rather than knowing Jesus. We don’t stop to sit at Christ’s feet, to adore Him, to commune with God the Spirit. Far too often, that’s not the goal we have in mind…Here’s the second reason I’m a Pharisee and Calvinist, or, another reason why those two things happen together far more often than they should. The Pharisee and the Calvinist are both suspicious. Now I’m suspicious of a lot of things, but I’ll just mention one. I’m suspicious of joy. Yep. Now, not my joy. That’s another problem. No. Like a good Pharisee, other people’s joy makes me nervous. Not all people. Just those people who don’t express their joy the precise way I think they should. You see, without the ‘appropriate bounds’ their joy just may make them careless, lead them to error, hurt the church and cause of Christ. Their joy is combustible; it’s dangerous. It’s enthusiasm and flights of fancy that need to ballast of sobriety and sound theology.” Calvinist Confessions 1 and Calvinist Confessions 2 by Thabite Anyabwile

The Top 10 Theology Stories of 2009
“Counting down the events, debates, and books that shaped evangelical theology over the past year.” My Top Ten Theology Stories of 2009 by Colin Hansen (HT: JT)

Which Doctrinal Truths Would You Die For?
“I often tell people that there are some things that I believe that I would die for; there are some things that I believe that I would lose an arm for; there are some things that I believe that I would lose a finger for; and then there are some things that I believe that I would not even get a manicure for….

1. Essential for salvation
2. Essential for historic Christian orthodoxy
3. Essential for traditional orthodoxy
4. Essential for denominational orthodoxy
5. Important but not essential
6. Not Important
7. Pure speculation”
Essentials and Non-Essentials by C. Michael Patton

Sanctification by Psychiatric Drugs Alone?
“Pretty soon, we are going to have a pill that will take care of every disorder and sin…Wow! Complete sanctification, from beginning to end, in a bottle…Is it possible that depression is often something that accomplishes the will of God more than being ‘happy’? Is it possible that anxiety is a tool God uses to help us recognize our need for him. Is it possible that giving kids meds to control their attention could be sterilizing their giftedness…Is it possible that these mind altering drugs are causing much more harm than good?” (GG: If you struggle with depression or other mental-emotional “disorders,” consider natural, nutritional supplements like 5-HTP, lithium orotate, Sam-e, St. John’s Wort, etc. Thousands of former-psychiatric drug users have testified that natural solutions work better, with far less side-effects.) “Let’s Make Mommy Happy” or Martin Luther on Zoloft by C. Michael Patton

Gospel Pictures in the Old Testament
The Abrahamic Covenant, Old Covenant and Law of Moses, Ten Commandments, Circumcision and Baptism, and the Sabbath Gospel Pictures by Mike Adams

Promises to Israel Fulfilled by Christ and Believers in Him
“Those who have faith in Christ are the children of Abraham (i.e. Israel) (Gal 3.7)” Church and Israel by Blake White

Greg Beale Articles and Audio
“Beale’s work in the area of biblical theology is very helpful, especially in relation to the way in which in New Testament uses the Old Testament.” Gregory K. Beale Resources by James Grant

Harmonizing Jesus’ Genealogies in Matthew and Luke
“So why are the genealogical trees in Matthew and Luke so different? Matthew begins his Gospel with Jesus’ genealogy, while Luke places it, strangely, between Jesus’ baptism and temptation. Matthew has an ascending list, moving from Abraham up to Jesus, while Luke has a descending list, moving from Jesus down to Adam. Matthew’s list is partial; Luke’s is complete. And most significantly, while the two lists are virtually identical from Abraham to David, they diverge greatly from David to Jesus…Are there difficulties in reconciling the genealogies? Can they be harmonized? The answer in both cases is yes. Matthew’s and Luke’s lists stem largely from Old Testament genealogies (see Gen. 10-11 and 1 Chron. 1-3) and Jewish sources, and the differences between the names occur largely because each evangelist was selective in whom he included.” Who Was Jesus’ Grandfather? by Grant Osborne

100% of Men Have Seen Porn
“’We started our research seeking men in their 20s who had never consumed pornography,’ said Professor Simon Louis Lajeunesse. ‘We couldn’t find any.’” How to overcome temptations to porn: 9 articles and 3 books. Porndemic by Justin Taylor

Child Abuse Recovery by Psalms Counseling
“David Powlison’s booklet is being posted online in two parts. As he talks through the issues of recovering from abuse, he suggests turning to Psalms 55, 56, and 57, using four different colored markers to mark four different strands. Here’s an excerpt:” Recovering from Child Abuse: Help and Healing for Victims by Justin Taylor

MacArthur Cremates Oral Roberts and TBN
“Oral Roberts was certainly the 20th century’s leading advocate of that idea. His prosperity doctrine laid the foundation for an enormous media-based religious system, and Oral Roberts was indeed its chief architect…One leading charismatic figure this week stated that without Oral Roberts’ influence, “the entire charismatic movement might not have occurred.” That may well be true…One thing all the obituaries agree on is that Oral Roberts paved the way for all the charismatic televangelists and faith-healers who dominate religious television today…The channel lineup I receive includes at least seven other channels whose schedules are filled with false teachers and charlatans. There’s The Church Channel, Daystar, GodTV, World Harvest Television (LeSEA), Total Christian Television, and several others…Like Tetzel on steroids, the Crouches and virtually all the key broadcasters on TBN live in garish opulence, while constantly begging their needy viewers for more money.” Measuing Oral Roberts Influence and Unholy Trinity by John MacArthur

Edited 1/2/10

Best Blogs Digest - Nov. 2009

December 1st, 2009

by Greg Gibson

Does Being Christ-Centered Lead to Imbalanced Trinitarianism?
“Does ‘Christocentrism’ betray an asymetrical trinitarianism that neglects the Father and the Spirit?…Christocentrism can happily co-exist ith orthodox trinitarianism because (1) it is only through Christ that we kow of the Trinity, and (2) the Trinity itself is Christ-centered.” Christ-centered hermeneutics, salvation-history, preaching, evangelism, and sanctification. Christocentrism: An Asymmetrical Trinitarianism? by Dane C. Ortlund

Christ-Centered Preaching: Every Message or Every Ministry?
“Here Hood points out that the NT sees the OT stories as both pointing to Christ and given as moral encouragement, warning, in sum as examples. The book of James references four OT characters and the prophets all of whom are used as examples for the guidance of NT believers (Jas. 2:14-26; 5:10-28). The author of Hebrews appears to challenge Chapell’s disavowal of ‘be like’ interpretation; he repeatedly mentions believers as models of active faith in the face of difficulty. Parables also routinely call hearers to imitate the character in the story. The ‘be like’ emphasis seems entirely appropriate in the parable of the wise builder (Matt. 7:24-27), the wise virgins and investors (Matt 25:1-30) and the Good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-27). Jesus even concludes some of the parables with the words, ‘Go and do likewise.’” Christ-Centered Interpretation Only? by Patrick Schreiner (HT:TW)

“Hood’s major concern is that the positive push to interpret Christ in all the Scripture has led pastors and scholars to sometimes overlook and even belittle moral instruction. In response, Hood cites several New Testament examples to make the case for moral instruction. Writing in Romans 15:4, the apostle Paul says, “For whatever was written in former days was written for our instruction, that through endurance and through the encouragement of the Scriptures we might have hope.” Similarly, he writes in 1 Corinthians 10:6, “Now these things took place as examples for us, that we might not desire evil as they did.” According to Hood, these passages show that Christians don’t just see Jesus in the Old Testament. They also see themselves. Paul says the Old Testament offers believers encouragement and warning. Surveying the New Testament, Hood finds several examples of the exhortation some Christ-centered interpreters denigrate. Chastising the selfish Corinthians, Paul shows them Christ’s way of self-sacrifice (1 Cor. 2:2). The “hall of faith” in Hebrews 11:2-12:4 showcases Old Testament believers worthy of imitation. And who can forget Jesus’ parable of the good Samaritan (Luke 10:25-37), which he concludes, “Go and do likewise.” After amassing this evidence, Hood writes, “Claims that we only teach and preach Christ and that every sermon must be focused squarely on Christ are misguided. Hood acknowledges that a compelling apology for the Christ-centered interpretation comes from the road to Emmaus: “And beginning with Moses and all the Prophets, [Jesus] interpreted to them in all the Scriptures the things concerning himself” (Luke 24:27). Still, Hood wants interpreters to proceed with caution. Luke notes only that many passages testify to Christ, not that every passage leads to Christ.” (GG: John Frame is correct: Every ministry, not every message, should be Christ-centered.) Christ-Centered Cautions by Colin Hansen

Sanctification by Anti-Idolatry: Is All Sin Really Idolatry?
“I have noticed that couching sin in terms of idolatry seems increasingly to mark some recent attempts to communicate the gospel to a new generation. Judging from common counseling approaches, best-selling books and blogosphere endorsements that extol this idolatry model, I doubt mine is an isolated observation. Which leads me to ask: In the increasingly fashionable world of Reformed Christianity, is idolatry becoming the new sin?…This take on idolatry speaks of sin not so much as “doing bad things” as it does “making good things into ultimate things.” In this model, sinners do not so much commit a crime as elevate good things of life beyond their proper place…idolatry-oriented approach to the sin problem…defining sin in these terms of idolatry harbors at least two defects: first, it misreads the biblical examples of genuine idolatry; and second, and even more importantly, it diminishes both the essence and the effects of sin…This reality is reflected in part in the Scriptural correlation that “greed” (or “covetousness”) is “idolatry” (Col 3:5; cf. Eph 5:6). That statement literally does not say that it is the thing (the supposedly overly-valued “good” thing) that is the idol. That statement literally says it is the wanting, the craving condition of man’s heart, not so much the thing that is craved, that is idolatrous.”

(GG: Six Concerns About “Hyper-Anti-Idolatry”:
1. God’s law is summarized by love (not idolatry).
2. The NT spiritualizes idolatry only twice [Eph. 5:5; Col. 3:5]. Beware of emphasizing it more than the NT.
3. Greed is both idolatry and false lordship (Mt. 6:24). But we don’t use lordship as the organizing key to sin or sanctification.
4. The Prophets called idolatry (spiritual) “adultery.” But we don’t use adultery as the organizing key to sin or sanctification.
5. Sanctification is multi-faceted, with no reductionistic, simplistic key.
6. Over-emphasis on spiritual idolatry leads to introspectionism, instead of Christ-centeredness. Not every sin has hidden motives.
In summary, be conscious of spiritual idolatry, but beware of hyper-anti-idolatry. Balance, balance, balance!) Is Idolatry the New Sin? by Carlton Wynne

N.T. Wright Converting Protestants to Rome
(Francis) “Beckwith told Christianity Today, ‘I have met several former evangelical Protestants who have told me that Wright’s work in particular helped them to better appreciate the Catholic view of grace.’ Also, Taylor Marshall, director of the Catholic Information Center in Washington, D.C., said he speaks with new Catholic converts every month, about half of whom have been ‘deeply influenced’ by Wright. Isn’t that interesting? N.T. Wright and Rome by Blake White

Prayerlessness Is Unbelief
“Almost all of us want to pray more frequently, and yet our lives seem too disordered. But in God’s mind our messy, chaotic lives are an impetus to prayer instead of an obstacle to prayer…If you know you are needy and believe that God helps the needy, you will pray. Conversely, if we seldom pray, the problem goes much deeper than a lack of organization and follow through. The heart that never talks to God is the heart that trusts in itself and not in the power of God. Prayerlessness is unbelief.” Prayerlessness Is Unbelief by Kevin DeYoung

Six Things for Which Paul Gave Thanks
“1. He was thankful for their faith in the Lord Jesus Christ (Romans, Ephesians, Colossians, 1, 2 Thessalonians, Philemon).
2. He was thankful for their love for all the saints (Ephesians, Colossians, 1, 2 Thessalonians, Philemon).
3. He was thankful for their steadfastness, especially in trial (1, 2 Thessalonians).
4. He was thankful for their spiritual gifts (1 Corinthians).
5. He was thankful for their partnership in the gospel (Philippians).
6. He was thankful for their history and mutual affection (2 Timothy).” How Did Paul Give Thanks? by Kevin DeYoung

Pastor-Author Donates 90% of His Income
“According to one comment he made in a sermon, Chan gives away about 90 percent of his income (though his church administrator preferred the phrase “most of his income”). Chan doesn’t take a salary from his church, and his book royalties, which total about $500,000, mostly go to organizations like International Justice Mission, which rescues sex slaves in foreign countries. The Chans often open their home to families who need a place to stay. One of Cornerstone’s community pastors, Bill Lucas, lived with Chan for nine months, and says he “lives out what he says.” Francis Chan by Blake White

Christian Rap Sounds Like Speaking in Tongues
This is my first (and last?) time to listen to Christian rap. If the lyrics weren’t printed, I couldn’t understand them. “Unless you speak intelligible words with your tongue, how will anyone know what you are saying?” (1 Cor. 14:9). And I found the music rather irritating. “The fruit of the Spirit is…peace” (Gal. 5:22). Nevertheless, praise God for the beautiful gospel lyrics. “The important thing is that in every way…Christ is preached. And because of this I rejoice” (Phil. 1:28). I have to wonder if the Lord would use this brother’s ministry even more if the lyrics were wrapped in a more beautiful package? The Greatest Story Ever Told by Shai Linne

Free, Church Bulletin Inserts
“Free downloadable bulletin inserts for personal or church use.” (GG: Theologically faithful and well-written.) Church Bulletin Inserts by Jim Eliff and CCW

Best Blogs Digest - October 2009

November 2nd, 2009
By Greg Gibson

What You Must Believe If You Are a Premillennialist
“If you watched or listened to the eschatology roundtable discussion at Desiring God, you heard Sam Storms make the case that when Christ returns, the NT is clear that a number of things will end at that time (sin, corruption, death) and a number of things will begin at that time (our physical resurrection, final judgment, new heavens and new earth). In other words, when Christ returns, it’s “curtains” on sin and death. But in Premillennialism, there are still a thousand years of sin and death and corruption.” What You Must Believe If You Are a Premillennialist and “Thrones” in Revelation by Sam Storms

How to Attract the Next Generation
(GG: Everything said here about how to reach youth could also apply to how to reach postmoderns. Forget the philosophizing. Simply amaze them with God!)

“You just have to be like Jesus. That’s it. So the easy part is you don’t have to be with it. The hard part is you have to be with Him. If you walk with God and walk with people, you’ll reach the next generation. Let me unpack that a bit. After thinking through the question for over a year, I’ve come up five suggestions for pastors, youth workers, campus staff, and for anyone else who wants to pass the faith on to the next generation: Grab them with passion. Win them with love. Hold them with holiness. Challenge them with truth. Amaze them with God.” Grab Them With Passion by Kevin DeYoung

“Jesus said it best: ‘By this all people will know that you are my disciples, if you have love for one another’…Jesus did not say ‘They will know you are my disciples by how attune you are to new trends in youth culture.’ Or ‘They will know you are my disciples by the hip atmosphere you create.’ Give up on relevance, and try love. If they see love in you, love for each other, love for the world, and love for them, they will listen. No matter who the ‘they’ are.” Win Them With Love by K.D.

“What I’m saying is that being experts in the culture matters nothing, and worse than nothing, if we are not first of all experts in love, truth, and holiness. Look at what God says in 2 Peter 1:5-8…For if these qualities are yours and are increasing, they keep you from being ineffective or unfruitful in the knowledge of our Lord Jesus Christ. Did you pick up on the promise in the last verse? If we are growing in faith, knowledge, self-control, steadfastness, godliness, brotherly affection, and love, we will not be ineffective ministers for Christ. If ever there was a secret to effective ministry, these verses give it to us. Grow in God and you’ll make a difference in people’s lives.” Hold Them With Holiness by K.D.

“Doctrine and preaching—88% said the doctrine led them to their church and 90% said the preaching led them there, in particular, pastor who preached with certitude and conviction.” Challenge Them With Truth by K.D.

“If only I would trust God that God is enough to win the hearts and minds of the next generation. It’s his work much more than it is mine or yours. So make him front and center. Don’t preach your doubts as mystery. And don’t reduce God to your own level. If ever people were starving for a God the size of God, surely it is now.” Amaze Them With God by K.D.

Purity, Sex, and Marriage Books
See this helpful annotated bibliography. Sexual Detox: Recommended Resources by Tim Challies

Tom Schreiner’s Theology Articles
Learn from Schreiner’s journal articles on topics including God’s law, book reviews, and more. Thomas R. Schreiner by Thomas Schreiner

Propitiation as the Ground of Christus Victor
“So it’s not Christus Victor (Christ defeating his enemies) instead of propitiation (Christ bearing God’s wrath)–rather, it’s Christus Victor because of propitiation. Both are gloriously important, but only in that order.” Propitiation as the Ground of Christus Victor by Justin Taylor

Critiques of the Missional Church
“I have no idea when exactly conservative evangelicals co-opted the term “missional.” [9] My guess is that conservative writers and pastors in the emerging church movement like Mark Driscoll, after tromping through some of the same fields as their liberal counterparts, reached down, pulled up the missional plant by the roots, and then transplanted it into conservative soil.” What in the World is a Missional Church by Jonathan Leeman

“1. What are the Strengths of Missional Churches?
    A. Missional Churches Have a Commendable Passion for Evangelism.
    B. Missional Churches Have a Laudable Commitment to Engaging Culture.
    C. Missional Churches Have a Profitable Impulse for Reexamining Church Tradition.
    D. They Also Possess an Admirable Devotion to Social Impact.
2. What are the Weaknesses of Missional Churches?
    A. Missional Churches Tend to Be Mission-Centered Rather Than Gospel-Centered.
    B. Missional Churches Tend to Have a Reductionistic Ecclesiology.
    C. Missional Churches Tend to Confuse Culture Engagement with Cultural Immersion.
    D. Missional Churches Tend to Downplay the Institutional and Organizational Nature of the Church.
    E. Missional Churches Tend to Have an Insufficient Understanding of Apostolic Ministry.” Critiquing the Missional Movement by Tony Reinke

Seminary Training On Campus, Online, or Where?
(GG: The advantages and disadvantages of seminary training on campus, extension centers, Internet classes, J-Terms, and independent study.) “There is no ‘best’ option for taking seminary courses. Each of the options has been helpful to me, depending upon my stage in life and ministry. The best thing a prospective student can do is consider the positives and negatives and figure out which option best suits the current need.” Seminary Online, by Extension or On-Campus? by Trevin Wax

Muslim Population Growing to 1 in 4 People Worldwide
“Nearly one in four people worldwide is Muslim — and they are not necessarily where you might think, according to an extensive new study that aims to map the global Muslim population…There are about 1.57 billion Muslims in the world, according to the report, ‘Mapping the Global Muslim Population,’ by the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life. That represents about 23 percent of the total global population of 6.8 billion.” Nearly 1 in 4 people worldwide is Muslim, report says by CNN

Evolution’s Missing Link Disappears
“Remember Ida, the fossil discovery announced last May with its own book and TV documentary? A publicity blitz called it “the link” that would reveal the earliest evolutionary roots of monkeys, apes and humans…The new analysis says Darwinius does not belong in the same primate category as monkeys, apes and humans. Instead, the analysis concluded, it falls into the other major grouping, which includes lemurs.” ‘Missing link’ primate isn’t a link after all by MSNBC

Best Blogs Digest - September 2009

October 2nd, 2009

By Greg Gibson

God’s Presence From Eden, to the Temple, to the New Earth
Understand God’s redemptive-historical plan to expand His glorious presence from the Garden, to the Temple, to the New Earth. Much of this material is taken from the book “The Temple and the Church’s Mission: A Biblical Theology of the Dwelling Place of God by G.K. Beale. Two sermons: “Why Is the New Heaven and the New Earth Equated with the Temple?” Highest recommendation. Part 1 and Part 2 by G.K. Beale

12 Reasons Why Adam Was a Real, Historical Person
“But the twelve observations above indicate that the historicity of Adam is a thread woven all the way through the Bible’s history, theology, and ethics. Pull out that thread and sooner or later the whole garment will unravel.” Was Adam a Real Historical Individual? by James Anderson

Biblical Counseling Training
Where can you find training in Biblical counseling (as opposed to psychological counseling)? Top Choices for Counselor Training by Rick Thomas, and Biblical Counseling Training by 9 Marks

New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ by Schreiner
“Christ the Center was pleased to welcome Dr. Thomas R. Schreiner to discuss New Testament Theology: Magnifying God in Christ. Dr. Schreiner’s book has been warmly welcomed by many respected scholars in the reformed community and listeners will understand why when they hear Dr. Schreiner detail his project.” New Testament Theology by Thomas Schreiner

Evangelizing Headhunters and Cannibals
“’There are lots of unreached tribes in Papua New Guinea. Some of them are cannibalistic and hostile headhunting tribes; they are completely unreached by the gospel. Come with me brother – Let’s go get some of them for Jesus.’…There’s an important difference between unevangelized and unreached peoples. Unevangelized people are unconverted individuals in places where there are established churches. Unreached peoples are those that live in regions where there are no churches and no access to the evangelical gospel in their culture. And to answer your question about the present trend; 96% of the missionary work force is still laboring in unevangelized, but not truly unreached regions. Here it is again – 9 out of 10 Christian missionaries that go cross-cultural are still going to reached places! Here’s still another way to say it – Something like 90% of all “ministers” worldwide are concentrating on only 2% of the world’s population! We are massively overly evangelizing places where the gospel is already well planted! I believe that we need a substantial strategic redeployment of the missionary workforce to the areas where there is still no access to the evangelical gospel.” Interview With David Sitton

“Stop Dating Churches, and Marry One”
Why join a church?
“1. Make visible your commitment to Christ and his people…
2. Makes a powerful statement in a low-commitment culture…
3. We can be overly independent…
4. Keeps us accountable…
5. Help your pastor and elders be more faithful shepherds…
6. Gives you an opportunity to make promises.”
Why Membership Matters by Kevin DeYoung

Diversity in Musical Style, Unity in Christ-Centered Lyrics
“I believe it very good for our churches to sing songs from different eras, traditions, and styles…Songs with 101-level truths should not be the staple of our musical diet, but they should be on our plate…Imagine if the church stopped singing new songs after the Reformation just because the songs were new. No “And Can it Be,” no “Amazing Grace,” no “Holy, Holy, Holy.”…Christ–sung in our songs, called up in our prayers, and heralded in the preaching–will be the glue that holds us together, and not music. That’s the kind of unity in diversity worth celebrating.” In Defense of Musical Diversity by Kevin DeYoung

History of “Grace to You” With John MacArthur
“This year marks the ministry’s 40th anniversary…And within 5 years the ministry was distributing a million tapes a year. (We get that many downloads in a typical month today.)…How many employees does GTY have? Around 50 full time plus 175 volunteers who donate time and energy every week…Our annual budget today is about $17.9 million.” Meet the Ministries: Grace to You by Tim Challies

A Self-Worshiper vs. a God-Worshiper
“There was a stark difference between the two acceptance speeches. As I listened to the two speeches, all I could think of was the old commercial catchphrase, “Like Mike… If I could be like Mike.” Unfortunately, in this instance, Mike was the last person anyone should aspire to be like. This was definitely not a Michael Jordan highlight. Jordan’s Speech was self-centered, indulgent, arrogant, and at times embarrassing. In contrast, David Robinson rose to the occasion and made a brief, inspiring, encouraging speech (see his speech here) that made his family, his team, and his friends proud.
David Elevated Others…Mike Elevated Mike
David Honored His Family…Mike Honored Himself
David Was Brief…Mike Was Indulgent
David Honored God…Mike Honored Basketball
David sees His Legacy in His Family…Mike sees His…in His Highlights”
Be Like David… Not Like Mike by Voddie Baucham

Best Blogs Digest - August 2009

September 1st, 2009

Problem: Disinterest in Evangelism - Solution: Passion for Christ
“Mission is not to be the focus of our life and faith…God calls us to a growing commitment to a Person, our Lord Jesus Christ, not a growing commitment to a task, even one as admirable as mission…I can’t endorse this phrase anymore ["The church exists for mission like fire exists for burning."]. The church does not exist for mission. It exists for the Lord Jesus Christ…we dare not make something we do the justification of our existence. Lack of interest in mission is not fundamentally caused by an absence of compassion or commitment, nor by lack of information or exhortation. And lack of interest is not remedied by more shocking statistics, more gruesome stories or more emotionally manipulative commands to obedience. It is best remedied by intensifying people’s passion for Christ, so that the passions of his heart become the passions that propel our hearts.” Confession of a Recovering Mission Fanatic by Tim Dearborn

Theological Perfectionism (”Sanctification by Theology Alone”)
“I recall when I was in seminary (Westminster Seminary California, 1992-96) that many of the young men used to sit around and debate the fine points of Van Tillian presuppositional apologetics for hours. They would be incredibly critical of any other form of apologetics, even other Reformed apologists like Francis Schaeffer or R. C. Sproul. The interesting thing was that it was a debate about the theory of apologetics. But the time and effort spent on getting the theory right was not matched by an equal zeal to actually use the theory in evangelizing unbelievers. Why? Because they were more interested (and I am guilty of this myself) of being right than in seeing sinners come to Christ. In other words, theological perfectionism had become an idol…Do I enjoy the polemics of infant baptism a little too much, meanwhile neglecting to remember my own baptism and all that it proclaims to me about my union with Christ in his death and resurrection (Romans 6)? Am I more concerned about critiquing the Roman Catholic, Lutheran, or Zwinglian views of the Lord’s Supper than I am in actually enjoying communion with Christ in the table, in all its mystery?…Millennial views. We get so bogged down in the charts and debates that we ignore the cardinal issue — being spiritually awake and ready for the Master’s return…But while we are arguing over whether there will be a future for national Israel, we fail to reflect on the future hope that we all agree on, the hope of the resurrection and being with the Lord forever. We must not strain out the gnat of Dispensational errors only to swallow the camel of being spiritually asleep…Theological perfectionism promotes spiritual pride…Theological perfectionism always causes disunity and dissension in the body of Christ.” (GG: Beware of the error of “Sanctification by Theology Alone.” Been there, done that. Guilty, repented, forgiven.) The Problems of Theological Perfectionism by Lee Irons

“No New Doctrine” - Is Your Confession of Faith Inerrant?
“I discovered a darker side to the Princetonian tradition. That darker side involved an absolute devotion to the Westminster Confession as the pinnacle of theological achievement that could never be improved upon. Charles Hodge boasted that a new idea never arose at Princeton. Warfield, although a much better theologian than Hodge never wrote a systematic theology because he believed that his mentor’s Systematic Theology could not be improved upon. They adopted a mentality which Briggs labeled orthodoxism. ‘Orthodoxism assumes to know the truth and is unwilling to learn; it is haughty and arrogant, assuming the divine prerogatives of infal­libility and inerrancy; it hates all truth that is unfamiliar to it, and persecutes it to the uttermost’…the Princetonian pre-commitment to the Westminster Confession…I also discovered that while the Princeton theologians themselves were able to maintain a warm personal piety with their commitment to the system, the graduates of Princeton were not. it is not too much to say that many even among the Old School read only the theological material of the Princetonians. This fact contributed to a cold creedal orthodoxy among a significant contingent of the Old School with its stress on pure doctrine…I also discovered a deep dichotomy between the head and the heart. Charles Hodge, as representative of the Princetonian position, displayed a great antipathy for any emphasis on the subjective nature of Christianity. At one point he stated: ‘The idea that Christianity is a form of feeling, a life, and not a system of doctrines is con­trary to the faith of all Christians. Christianity always has a creed. A man who believes certain doctrines is a Christian.’…This stress on the objective nature of the Faith has led to the charge that Princeton was rational­istic in its approach to Christianity. Numerous historians and theologians have contended that the Princetonians compartmentalized faith and life.” Princeton and Propositions by James Sawyer

A Church Making Disciples by the Word
“David Platt has preached for seven hours straight. He can recite Romans 1-8 on the spot. He delivered the most powerful sermon in the history of the Southern Baptist Convention Pastors’ Conference. People brought the sick into the streets and laid them on beds and mats so that his shadow might fall on some of them as he passed by. Okay, so the last item was Peter, not Platt…I go to other places, such as house churches in Asia, and they study for 11 or 12 hours, knowing they risk their lives. They’ll dive in deep. We came back and tried to do something similar here. We call it secret church and do it a couple times a year. We gather together for intensive study with no frills, nothing flashy, no entertainment value. The first time, about 1,000 showed up. We studied Old Testament overview from 6 p.m. to midnight, but usually it goes longer, supplemented by times in prayer for the persecuted church. It’s all ages, but the predominant demographic is college students and young singles. It’s grown to the point where we need to offer tickets at $5 for reservations and the cost of a study guide. We’ll do it again in October with 2,500 folks. It’s theological in nature. We’ve done a night on the Atonement, another on the doctrine of God. This time we’re doing spiritual warfare. It’s one of my favorite sights as a pastor to look out at 12:30 a.m. and see a room full of 2,500 people, their Bibles open, soaking it in.” The Word Does the Work

Chrysostom: 4th Century Expository Preacher
“John preached through books of the Bible, verse by verse. The first of many such records we have are 67 sermons on Genesis, verse by verse, from beginning to end. This forces the preacher to tackle all sorts of things he normally could avoid.” Ministry Lessons from Chrysostom

Why Gays Will Ask Your Counsel
“Do you want guys confessing their struggles with pornography as they seek to join the church? Do you want people with real problems (homosexual urges and the fallout from past sexual sin, whether lingering STD’s or guilt from an abortion) joining the church and coming for counsel in their struggle against sin?…You don’t get this from wearing cool clothes, having a trendy name for your church or learning to preach from comedians. If it comes…it will come by the power of the Spirit through the preaching of the Word.” True Authenticity by Jim Hamilton

Ministry Success From Vision or the Gospel?
“Western evangelicalism tends to run through cycles of fads. At the moment, books are pouring off the presses telling us how to plan for success, how “vision” consists in clearly articulated “ministry goals,” how the knowledge of detailed profiles of our communities constitutes the key to successful outreach…one may perhaps be excused for marveling how many churches were planted by Paul and Whitefield and Wesley and Stanway and Judson without enjoying these advantages…Ever so subtly, we start to think that success more critically depends on thoughtful sociological analysis than on the gospel…We depend on plans, programs, vision statements—but somewhere along the way we have succumbed to the temptation to displace the foolishness of the cross with the wisdom of strategic planning…I fear that the cross, without ever being disowned, is constantly in danger of being dismissed from the central place it must enjoy, by relatively peripheral insights that take on far too much weight. Whenever the periphery is in danger of displacing the center, we are not far removed from idolatry.” The Cross and Christian Ministry by Don Carson

High Moral Failures in One “Pastor” Churches
“The case for plurality of elders can be argued along four lines: biblical, historical, theological, and pragmatic. At bottom, I would say that the reason the scriptures teach multiple eldership is at least twofold: (1) mutual accountability is necessary if leaders are to avoid falling into sin; and (2) a church takes on the personality of its leader/s: if there is just one leader, the church will inevitably take on that man’s personality, including his quirks and faults. But if more than one person leads the church, there is the greater chance that the church will be balanced…The biblical evidence is overwhelmingly on the side of multiple elders. The few passages which might otherwise be interpreted certainly do not have to be so interpreted and, in fact, most likely should not be. This fact illustrates a fundamental principle of biblical interpretation: do not follow an interpretation which is only possible; instead, base your convictions on what is probable…Churches that have a pastor as an authority above others (thus, in function, a monarchical episcopate) have a disproportionately high number of moral failures at the top level of leadership.” Who Should Run the Church? A Case for the Plurality of Elders by Daniel Wallace

“Free Will” - Free to Do What?
If you (or your friends) are struggling with the question of how God’s will interacts with man’s will, here is some clear thinking. Do We Have a Free Will by Andy Naselli

Deadbeat Children
“Why is it that we heap scorn on “deadbeat” parents who fail to take care of underage children, but excuse adult children who don’t take care of their feeble parents?…One friend recalled having to bathe his grandfather. ‘Being a typical self-absorbed college student, I wasn’t thrilled about the prospect,’ he said. But he quickly became mindful of Christ’s humility and service toward us. This was nothing compared to what Jesus had done for me—this was nothing compared to what my parents and grandparents had done for me.” Honor Thy Father’ for Grownups by Mollie Ziegler Hemingway

12 Bible Reading Plans
Choose from 10 ESV Bible reading plans, The Discipleship Journal Reading Plan, or the Book-at-a-Time Bible Reading Plan Bible Reading Plans by Justin Taylor

Fundamentalism Is Changing
Remember Falwell, Van Impe, Bob Jones, Hyles, King James Only, and the GARBC? “…one underlying thesis of this series is that the fundamentalist movement no longer exists. The unraveling of the movement began in the 1960s and has continued virtually without interruption. At the present, little coherence remains among self‐identified fundamentalists.” Fundamentalism: Things Have Changed by Kevin Bauder

United States: A Hindu Nation?
But recent poll data show that conceptually, at least, we are slowly becoming more like Hindus and less like traditional Christians in the ways we think about God, our selves, each other, and eternity…According to a 2008 Pew Forum survey, 65 percent of us believe that “many religions can lead to eternal life”…So here is another way in which Americans are becoming more Hindu: 24 percent of Americans say they believe in reincarnation, according to a 2008 Harris poll. We Are All Hindus Now by Newsweek

Compassion for Lost Worshipers
Have you ever seen lost Buddhists or Hindus worship their gods? “There are 16,000 people groups in the world. Over 6,000 are considered unreached. That’s 1/3 of the world’s population…70% of Asians have not heard of Jesus Christ…The gospel is only good news if it gets there in time…Go, send or disobey.” Tears of the Saints

How NOT to Be a Youth Pastor
Sometimes you can learn how to minister the right way by studying bad examples, then doing the opposite. “Preach the Word!” Ignatius the Ultimate Youth Pastor by Justin Taylor

Best Blogs Digest - July 2009

August 1st, 2009

By Greg Gibson

6 Evangelism Courses Reviewed
Six popular evangelism courses compared and contrasted: Alpha, Christianity Explained, Christianity Explored, Coming Alive, Discovering Christianity, and Simply Christianity. And, the winner is…Evangelism Courses Comparison Chart and Evangelism Courses Comparison Guide by Greg Gilbert at 9Marks.

Without the Gospel…
“Without the gospel everything is useless and vain; without the gospel we are not Christians; without the gospel all riches is poverty, all wisdom folly before God; strength is weakness, and all the justice of man is under the condemnation of God. But by the knowledge of the gospel we are…” Calvin on the Gospel by John Calvin.

Recession Inspires Doubts of Prosperity Gospel
“In times of record-high foreclosures and Treasury Department scrambling to shore up loan-refinancing initiatives, the Prosperity Gospel can sound as if it comes from preachers who live under rocks, not in mansions: ‘God wants to give you your own house,’ big-cheese pitchman Joel Osteen announced in 2007’s Your Best Life Now…Yet he artfully disappears for housing-crisis questions like ‘Why, if God wants to reward the faithful with material possessions, are so many believers in foreclosure?’ These high rates in particular have made some Doubting Thomases of Prosperity’s controversial centerpiece: the belief in ‘positive confession,’ or the idea that the faithful can ‘name it and claim it…’ God and the Recession by Slate Magazine.

Pope Seeks Global Government, Economy, and Religion
“Pope Benedict XVI today called for reforming the United Nations and establishing a ‘true world political authority’ with ‘real teeth’ to manage the global economy with God-centered ethics…the pope says such an authority is urgently needed to end the current worldwide financial crisis. It should ‘revive’ damaged economies, reach toward ‘disarmament, food security and peace,’ protect the environment and ‘regulate migration’…The encyclical also echoes Benedict’s many speeches, saying that to reach sound a global economy every responsibility and commitment must be rooted in the values of Christian truth.” (GG: Didn’t we try a Roman Catholic theocracy once before? Do you remember the result? Persecution, imprisonment, and martyrdom to dissenters like Anabaptists and Reformers. Two of the threats that Rome fears most are freedom of worship and speech. Oh, how soon we forget history! P.S. Does the title remind you of Rev. 13 and 17?) Pope Calls for God-Centered Global Economy by USA Today.

Best Blogs Digest - June 2009

July 1st, 2009

By Greg Gibson

If You Commit Adultery…26 Consequences
“So is he who sleeps with another man’s wife; no one who touches her will go unpunished. (Proverbs 6:25-29)…If we would rehearse in advance the ugly and overwhelming consequences of immorality, we would be far more prone to avoid it.” Counting the Cost of Sexual Immorality by Randy Alcorn

Piper vs. Wright: The Justification Debate Abridged
If you don’t have time to read their books, here’s a concise summary of their differences. The Justification Debate: A Primer” by Trevin Wax

MacArthur: Seeker-Sensitive Movement Is the New Liberalism
“I can listen to a guy preach—put anybody in front of me—and I’ll tell you what his view of Scripture is by what he says. If he doesn’t preach out of the Bible, I know what his view of Scripture is, I don’t care what he says. I don’t care if he wants to die telling me he’s a believer in inerrancy, if he gets up and does not preach the Word of God, that’s his view of Scripture leaking all over the place. Look, every preacher preaches for impact, for effect, for result. You’re up there saying what you think is going to get you the best result….I mean, it’s that simple! It comes down to this loss of preaching.” (GG: Notice the historical development from Norman Vincent Peale (self-confessed Freemason) to Robert Shuller (heretical false-teacher) to Bill Hybels to Rick Warren.) Seeker-Friendly - New Liberalism by John MacArthur

Why Your “Secular” Job Is Really Spiritual: Christ’s Incarnation
“As a student of the Reformation, I have been convinced for decades that the sacred-secular tension that my wife feels and that many who have grown up in the evangelical community feel, arises from a misreading of Scripture, and a misunderstanding of the nature of God and his relationship to creation. Beginning in the ancient church there was a wedge driven between the material and the spiritual with a corresponding wedge drawn between the secular and the sacred…Certainly the fact that the Incarnate God worked at a secular and ordinary (GG: carpenter) job, gives the lie to the idea that it is only “the spiritual” that matters. The eternal Son of God, by, through and for whom the entire universe was created, out of love and compassion for His creation, united himself eternally to humanity in its ordinariness and its physicality.” God and the Ordinary by M. James Sawyer

5 Distortions of the Gospel
1) The Cake Mix Gospel
2) The Cultural Gospel
3) The Cool Gospel
4) The Carnal Gospel
5) The Careful Gospel
5 Distortions of the Gospel in Our Day by James MacDonald

The Gospel Is for Unbelievers and Believers
“In counseling, I often come across two kinds of people: Some people think they are true Christians, but are probably not. They need a dose of gospel confrontation. Other people doubt they are true Christians, but probably are. They need a dose of gospel comfort.” Gospel Confrontation and Gospel Comfort by Trevin Wax

Best Blogs Digest - May 2009

June 1st, 2009

By Greg Gibson

Why Many Young Christians Are Becoming Calvinists
“Here are the two most important things you need to know about the rise of the New Calvinism: it’s not new and it’s not about Calvin…’Please God, don’t let the young, restless, and reformed movement be another historically ignorant, self-absorbed, cooler-than-thou fad.’…I’m praying: ‘Please God, don’t let the New Calvinism ever, ever be about the New Calvinism.’…But if the New Calvinism is to continue as a work of God, which I think it has been, it must continue to be about God. Young Christians have been drawn to Calvinism not because they were looking for Calvin or an ‘ism,’ but because they were drawn to a vision of a massive, glorious, fall-down-before-Him-as-though-dead kind of God who loves us because He wants to. The influence of Calvinism is growing because its God is transcendent and its theology is true. In a day when ‘be better’ moralism passes for preaching, self-help banality passes for counseling, and ‘Jesus is my boyfriend’ music passes for worship in some churches, more and more people are finding comfort in a God who is anything but comfortable. The paradox of Calvinism is that we feel better by feeling worse about ourselves, we do more for God by seeing how He’s done everything for us, and we give love away more freely when we discover that we have been saved by free grace…What draws people to Reformed theology is the belief that God is the center of the universe and we are not, that we are worse sinners than we imagine and God is a greater Savior than we ever thought possible, that the Lord is our righteousness and the Lord alone is our boast. The attraction of the New Calvinism is not Calvin, but the God Calvin saw.” Why I Am a Calvinist by Kevin DeYoung

The Virgin Lips Movement
“…a sizable number of younger evangelical couples are saving their first kiss for their wedding ceremony. In a culture where casual sex is the norm, some Tennesseans have taken the purity pledge to a whole new level, through a practice that some teens refer to as the ‘Virgin Lips Movement.’” True Lips Wait by Al Mohler

China House Church Preacher Training
“Each student, by the end of the year, has to be ready to preach (without notes) a one-hour sermon on each of the 66 books of the Bible. This sermon is to include an outline of the content of the book, and contemporary application to the individual, the church and the nation of China.” Preaching Curriculum by Peter Mead

The Postmodern Preaching Fad: Contextualization or Proclamation?
“Expository preaching…doesn’t fluctuate with culture…First of all, you have to understand that when you talk about a postmodern culture, that’s an academic assessment of the culture. The average Joe doesn’t have any idea what that means. All he knows is he’s pretty much free to think and do whatever he wants. That’s how postmodernism filters down to the guy in the pew. It’s not a philosophy—it’s a lifestyle…But all this goes completely against the grain of his conscience and his reason, and ultimately what he knows to be true. The unbeliever’s conscience is a reality, and even reason tells him that there have to be some absolutes. The bottom line is that expository preaching confronts the amorality of postmodernism with an authoritative message of absolute truth. It’s not a question of debating. It’s not a question of trying to find some way to sneak that in. It’s an issue of confronting this kind of thinking with the absolute authority of Scripture and then letting the Spirit of God make the application to the heart…In my own preaching, my objective is not to court the postmodern mind. My objective is to confront it—to hit it stone cold in the face with truth…I didn’t need to give an intricate philosophical defense, because this is exactly what Scripture says, and there is no need to defend it. You just proclaim it. See these guys were struck by the fact that what they heard was an absolute authoritative statement of a worldview that takes on postmodernism, without having to fuddle around and make all kinds of philosophical and rational arguments, and without having to answer every objection that arises…Paul says, if I speak to Jews I speak a certain way, and if I speak to Gentiles I speak a certain way. But that’s only at the point of entry. That has nothing to say about the style. In other words, people today are used to watching sitcoms on TV, but that doesn’t demand that you preach in a narrative style…Rather than trying to take the Bible and bring it into the modern day, I try to take the modern day and bring it back to the Bible…This stuff about culture shaping preaching is taking the Bible and redefining it in modern terms. My goal is to take modern culture and the people of that culture and redefine them in biblical terms so that they are living back in the Scriptures.” (Greg: If postmodernism is the current philosophy, what were the previous philosophies? Did preachers have to adjust their preaching for those philosophies? Is postmodernism the first and only philosophy for which evangelicals must adjust their preaching? Will preachers have to adjust their preaching for the next fad philosophy? What’s wrong with this picture? Faithful preaching adjusts the hearers, not the preacher.) Expository Preaching in a Postmodern Culture by John MacArthur

Legalism, Guilt, and Gospel Grace
“Pharisee-type believers unconsciously think they have earned God’s blessing through their behavior. Guilt-laden believers are quite sure they have forfeited God’s blessing through their lack of discipline or their disobedience. Both have forgotten the meaning of grace because they have moved away from the gospel and have slipped into a performance relationship with God.” All of Grace by Jerry Bridges

How John Stott Prepares a Sermon
“IV. Arrange your material to serve the dominant thought. A. Chisel and shape your material. Ruthlessly discard all material which is irrelevant to the dominant thought. Subordinate the remaining material to the dominant thought by using that material to illuminate and reinforce the dominant thought.” (Greg: Many preachers struggle to identify the major theme of the passage. Those who preach from short passages often over-emphasize a passing thought, like a theological doctrine, by making it the main theme. The cure for this is “Big Picture Preaching” from long passages, instead of short passages.) How Stott Prepares a Sermon by Colin Adams

S. Lewis Johnson Sermons Free Online
“Through the years, I have listened to the preaching of S. Lewis Johnson more than any other preacher” (Dr. John MacArthur). “Dr. S. Lewis Johnson was the greatest expository preacher of the 2nd half of the 20th century” (Dr. Bruce Waltke). Read and hear Dr. Johnson’s sermons here: The SLJ Institute by S. Lewis Johnson

10 People a Pastor Should Fear
“7. The guy on the theological hobbyhorse. His spiritual energy revolves around the rapture, paedocommunion, Calvinism or Arminianism, evolution, what-have-you and he thinks yours should too. These are distractions especially tempting for nerd pastors like me.” 10 People a Pastor Should Fear by Jared Wilson

How to Be a Friend of Sinners
8 practical ideas to befriend sinners to help them out of sin. Simplified Missional Living by Jonathan Dodson

The Top 5 Mistakes When Evangelizing Children
“1. Oversimplifying the Gospel of Christ
2. Coercing a Profession of Faith
3. Assuming the Reality of Regeneration
4. Assuring the Child of Salvation
5. Rushing the Ordinance of Baptism”
Evangelizing Children Part 1 and Part II by Grace Community Church

9 Reasons Why Christ Ascended
“…I began to realize how little Christians think about or emphasize the ascension today…Ask for contribution from the congregation to answer the question: “What are the most significant events of Jesus’ life or aspects of His work for us?” Answers will do doubt include such things as His virgin birth, sinless life, miracles, crucifixion, and resurrection. Sadly, I have yet to hear anyone mention the ascension…” The Importance of the Ascension of Christ by Keith Throop

Discontent Charismatics and Christ’s Sufficiency
“…during my time as a Charismatic, it seems that this higher level of expectation always resulted in a quest for more. We needed a greater happenings, more miraculous signs (not that anything I witnessed ever really qualified as such), more healing, more deliverance, more prophecies, generally a greater move of God. Whatever was existent never seemed to be enough. Since I served on the worship team for four years (keyboards/vocals), the expectation was that we would serve as the catalyst to make this happen, to “usher in the presence of God”, as was stated so many Sundays…Yes we really did need more of God in our lives and looked for it in external manifestations in order to affect an internal change. It seems to me there remained a continual state of dissatisfaction that only more could fill…and all instruction is for the purpose of completing every person in complete in Christ (Colossians 1:28). We who claim Christ as Savior have been made complete in Him (Colossians 2:10). That means He is all sufficient. What further are we looking for?…So we have sufficiency of the Spirit, sufficiency of Christ, sufficiency of the Word. What’s Missing? I contend that the insufficiency resides with us. We are what is missing. It seems to me that if we have the everything we need sufficient for life and godliness, as 2 Peter 1:3 tells us, that the more we are seeking may not be found in greater external manifestations but a greater capacity for divine connectedness. So maybe that means more surrender, more worship, more learning, more kneeling, more prayer, more giving, and more service. We can’t get anymore of something we already have but I am assured each day that the Spirit can always have more of us…” A Theology of More by Lisa Robinson

Who Is Better Qualified to Counsel: Psychologists or Christians?
“The most experienced psychologist or observer of human nature knows infinitely less of the human heart than the simplest Christian who lives beneath the Cross of Jesus.” Bonhoeffer on the Difference Between the Counsel of Psychology and Christianity by Dietrich Bonhoeffer

Should You Confess All Your Sins Publicly?
“Students were lined up at microphones to ‘confess’ before whole auditoriums of people a lot of things that were very lurid and not in keeping with the cautions of Ephesians 5.3,4. What is there about the confession of sin that requires private shameful acts to be confessed before audiences of both genders, not bound by close relationship to the one confessing? That smacks of the courtroom, not Christian fellowship. Or to think of another scenario: many of us have heard of congregations which try to take church discipline seriously by requiring not-yet-married couples,discovered to be promiscuous, to make open confession before the whole congregation with which they have been associated…I would add that the old practice of private confession to a priest–now making something of a comeback among Catholics–was so beset with priestly indiscretions that it became one of the best arguments for clerical marriage. Another Perspective on Confessing Sins Publicly by Ken Stewart

How NOT to Evangelize
“The controlled conversation technique is something new in evangelism and represents a real break-through in soul-winning…He gives not only the words, but the actions and gestures that need to go along with them.” (Greg: Where did Christ and the apostles ever evangelize like that? Guaranteed to fill the church with unregenerate hypocrites who will soon apostatize. Christ is glorified in disciples, not decisions.) Soul Winning Made Easy by Tim Challies

Best Blogs Digest - April 2009

May 2nd, 2009

By Greg Gibson

The Gospel Is What Christ Did, Not What We Must Do
“It is this: one must distinguish between, on the one hand, the gospel as what God has done and what is the message to be announced and, on the other, what is demanded by God or effected by the gospel in assorted human responses…The gospel is what God has done, supremely in Christ, and especially focused on his cross and resurrection. Failure to distinguish between the gospel and all the effects of the gospel tends, on the long haul, to replace the good news as to what God has done with a moralism that is finally without the power and the glory of Christ crucified, resurrected, ascended, and reigning.” Themelios Editorial by Don Carson

You’re Guilty of Killing Jesus
“From a theological perspective every Christian is as guilty of putting Jesus on the cross as Caiaphas. Thoughtful believers will surely admit that their own guilt is the more basic of the two; for if we believe Matthew’s witness, and Jesus could have escaped the clutches of Caiaphas (v. 53), then what drove Jesus to the cross was his commitment to the Father’s redemptive purposes.” Every Christian Is as Guilty of Putting Jesus on the Cross as Caiaphas by Don Carson

Doctrine Is Practical
“The word doctrine simply means “teaching.” And it’s ludicrous to say that Christ is anti-teaching. The central imperative of His Great Commission is the command to teach (Matthew 28:18-20)…But if there is a deficiency in preaching today, it is that there’s too much relational, pseudopsychological, and thinly life-related content, and not enough emphasis on sound doctrine…Romans provides the clearest example. Paul doesn’t give any exhortation until he has given eleven chapters of theology….He follows the same pattern in Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, and 1 Thessalonians. The doctrinal message comes first. Upon that foundation he builds the practical application, making the logical connection with the word therefore (Romans 1:1; Galatians 5:1; Ephesians 4:1; Philippians 2:1) or then (Colossians 3:1; 1 Thessalonians 4:1).” Doctrine IS Practical by John MacArthur

Are You Content With the Pastor Whom God Gave You?
“John Piper isn’t your pastor. John MacArthur knows nothing about you. Dave Hunt never got on his knees and prayed for you. Lloyd-Jones won’t come to your house when you’re recovering from surgery, or one of your children shatters your heart, or your marriage is shaking and rocking and barely hanging on. Charles Spurgeon won’t weep with you as you weep…God gave you the pastor He gave you…Your flesh-and-blood pastor can’t compete with these paper pastors…Because they’re not real.” Porn and Paper Pastors by Dan Phillips

See What’s in the ESV Study Bble
Have you been thinking about buying an ESV Study Bible? If so, you can see what’s inside from these videos. ESV Study Bible Videos by Good News / Crossway

The Parable of the Prodigal Son: Sermon Notes (Luke 15:1-32)

April 19th, 2009

“God Rejoices Over Sinners Who Repent”

Both Non-Religious and Religious Sinners Need to Repent
The Parables of the Prodigal Son, Lost Sheep & Lost Coin
(Luke 15:1-32)

By Greg Gibson

Parable: Short story that shows a religious lesson.

Intro: The reason why Jesus told these 3 stories…”Now the tax collectors and sinners were all gathering around to hear him. But the Pharisees and the teachers of the law complained, ‘This man welcomes sinners and eats with them’” (Lk. 15:1-2). Jesus answered with 3 stories…

1. The Parable of the Lost Sheep (Read Lk. 15:3-7; cf. Mt. 18:10)

    Theme: God seeks sinners to repent, and rejoices to welcome them. (Repent: Turn away from sin to God.)

2. The Parable of the Lost Coin (Read Lk. 15:8-10)

    Same theme as the Parable of the Lost Sheep, different metaphor.

3. The Parable of the Prodigal Son (Read Lk. 15:11-32)

    1st half: same theme as the first 2 stories. 2nd half: subtle rebuke to Pharisees.

3 Truths From the Parable of the Prodigal Son
1. Jesus Seeks Sinners to Repent
2. God Rejoices Over Sinners Who Repent
3. Self-Righteous People Don’t Think They’re Sinners Who Need to Repent

Three Actors in the Story:
1. Younger son: Non-religious, immoral sinners who later repent.
2. Father: God who rejoices over sinners who turn to Him.
3. Older son: Religious, moral, self-righteous people who don’t think they’re sinners who need to repent.

1. Jesus Seeks Sinners to Repent (Not for Friendship Alone)

    A. Jesus Didn’t Seek Sinners for Friendship Alone

    Jesus wasn’t lonely. He knew Psalm 1…

    “Blessed is the man who does not walk in the counsel of the wicked, stand in the way of sinners, or sit in the seat of mockers. But his delight is in the law of the LORD, and on His law he meditates day and night” (Ps. 1:1-2, cf. Ps. 26:4-5).

    Jesus didn’t have much in common with sinners, and neither do His followers…

    “Do not be yoked together with unbelievers. For what do righteousness and wickedness have in common? Or what fellowship can light have with darkness? What harmony is there between Christ and Belial? What does a believer have in common with an unbeliever? What agreement is there between the temple of God and idols? For we are the temple of the living God. As God has said: ‘I will live with them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they will be my people. Therefore come out from them and be separate, says the Lord” (2 Cor. 6:14-17).

    No, Jesus didn’t have much in common with sinners? Do you brothers? Do you have any friendships for the wrong reasons? Dating unbelievers?

    So, if Jesus wasn’t lonely, and didn’t have much in common with sinners, then why did He befriend them?

    B. Jesus Seeks Sinners to Turn to God

    Ever since Adam and Eve fell into sin, God has been seeking sinners to turn to Him.

    “But the LORD God called to (Adam), ‘Where are you?’” (Gen. 3:8)

    “And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel” (Gen. 3:15).

    God promised Abraham, “All peoples on earth will be blessed through you” (Gen. 12:3).

    God sent Jonah to warn the Ninevites to turn from their sin.

    “For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him” (Jn. 3:17).

    “Jesus went out and saw a tax collector by the name of Levi sitting at his tax booth, ‘Follow me,’ Jesus said to him, and Levi got up, left everything and followed him. Then Levi held a great dinner for Jesus at his house, and a large crowd of tax collectors and others were eating with them. But the Pharisees and the teachers of the law who belonged to their group complained to his disciples, ‘Why do you eat and drink with tax collectors and sinners?’ Jesus answered them, ‘It is not the healthy who need a doctor, but the sick. I have not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance’” (Lk. 5:27-32).

    Jesus was always seeking sinners to turn to God. There He was talking with…

    • The demon-possessed man who lived in the cemetery, saying, “Go home to your family and tell them how much the Lord has done for you, and how he has had mercy on you” (Mk. 5:1-20).

    • The sinful woman who anointed him, saying, “Your many sins are forgiven” (Lk. 7: 36-50).

    • The thief on the cross, saying, “I tell you the truth, today you will be with me in paradise” (Lk. 23:40-43).

    • Zacchaeus the tax collector, saying, “I must stay at your house today…Today salvation has come to this house…For the Son of Man came to seek and to save what was lost” (Lk. 19:1-10).

    • Adulterous woman at the well, saying, “You have had 5 husbands, and the man you now have is not your husband…I who speak to you am (the Messiah)” (Jn. 4:1-26, 39-42).

    He sent the apostles on a mission to seek sinners, for: “repentance and forgiveness of sins will be preached in his name” (Lk. 24:47; Mt. 28:18-20; Jn. 20:21-23; Acts 1:8).

    Brothers, do you have Jesus’ compassion and love for lost sinners? Are you a friend of sinners? Are you eating with sinners? Are you seeking lost sinners to help them out of sin?

    Yes, Jesus seeks sinners to turn to God.

2. God Rejoices Over Sinners Who Turn to Him

Some of the Worst Sinners Who Turned to God:
1. King Manassah: Idolatry, witchcraft, spiritism, child sacrifice (Read 2 Chr. 33:10-13)
2. Saul/Paul: Stephen martyred, persecution, arrests, jail (Acts 7:57 – 8:1)
3. Church at Corinth (Read I Cor. 6:9-11)

God has to humble sinners before they turn to Him. (Read Lk. 15:13-16) Sin is costly. $: Tiger Woods, gambling, alcoholism; Relationships: adultery

Have you turned away yet from your sin to God? (Read Lk. 15:17-20).

5 Signs of True Repentance
1. Right thinking about God: “When he came to his senses, he said, ‘How many of my Father’s employees have food to spare, and here I am starving to death’” (Lk. 15:17). Sin is like being out of your mind.

2. Confess your sin: “Father, I have sinned against heaven and against you” (Lk. 15:18b).

3. Humility: “I am no longer worthy to be called your son” (Lk. 15:19a).

4. Willing to serve God as your Lord: “make me like one of your employees” (Lk. 15:19b).

5. Go to God: “So he got up and went to his father” (Lk. 15:20).

Prodigal son saw his desperate need before repenting.

    “Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are those who mourn, for they will be comforted” (Mt. 5:3).

Notice the father didn’t greet him saying, “You stupid idiot…” or “You’ve sinned too many times…” Rather, the Father welcomed him home (Read Lk. 15:20, 22-24).

If you’re a non-religious sinner like the Prodigal Son, God will rejoice in you if you turn to Him. Go to Him right now, just like the Prodigal son did. Tell him, “Father, I’ve sinned against you. I’m not worthy of you. Let me serve you as Lord.” And, He will welcome you with a hug and a kiss because God rejoices over sinners who turn to Him.

3. Self-Righteous People Don’t Think They’re Sinners Who Need to Repent

Parable of the Prodigal Son is about 2 lost sons: liberal left and conservative right. Older brother thought he wasn’t a sinner: Listen, he said, “All these years I’ve been serving you and never disobeyed your orders.” (Lk. 15:29)

    “For ALL have sinned and fall short of the glory of God” (Rom. 3:23).

“Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners” (1 Tim. 1:15).
If you don’t think you’re a sinner, then Jesus didn’t come to save you.
How many sins do you have to commit to be a sinner?

    “God…commands ALL people everywhere to repent” (Acts 17:30).

7 Signs of Self-Righteous Pride
1. Laughing at the sins of others.
2. Criticizing others to exalt yourself above them.
3. Boasting about how good you are, “I did this, I did that.”
4. Saying, “I’m not as bad as that person.”
5. Saying, “I’m a good person.”
6. Saying, “I’m not a sinner.”
7. Complaining when ex-sinners receive forgiveness.

Pharisees were proud, self-righteous hypocrites, full of pride, deceit, and greed (Mt. 23). They claimed to know God, but when He came to earth, they killed Him (Acts 3:15).

1st century Jewish culture: tax collectors disrespected, Pharisees respected…

“To some who were confident of their own righteousness and looked down on everybody else, Jesus told this parable: ‘Two men went up to the temple to pray, one a Pharisee and the other a tax collector. The Pharisee stood up and prayed about himself; ‘God, I thank you that I am not like all other men – thieves, sinners, adulterers – or even like this tax collector. I fast twice a week and give a tenth of all I get.’ But the tax collector stood at a distance. He would not even look up to heaven, but beat his breast and said, ‘God, have mercy on me a sinner.’ I tell you that this man, rather than the other, went home justified before God. For everyone who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted” (Lk. 18:9-14).

“(Jesus) said to (the Pharisees), ‘You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of men, but God knows your hearts’” (Lk. 16:15). Lust = adultery (Mt. 5:28) and hate = murder (1 Jn. 3:15).

“Jesus said to (the priests, elders, and Pharisees), ‘I tell you the truth, the tax collectors and the prostitutes are entering the kingdom of God ahead of you. For John came to you to show you the way of righteousness, and you did not believe him, but the tax collectors and the prostitutes did. And even after you saw this, you did not repent and believe him” (Mt. 21:31-32).

Proud, self-righteous people don’t understand that the only one good is God, not them.

    “No one is good except God alone” (Mark 10:18).

    “None is righteous, no, not one…no one does good, not even one” (Romans 3:11-12).

Proud, self-righteous people don’t understand that they need God’s righteousness, not their own.

    “in order that I may gain Christ and be found in him, not having a righteousness of my own that comes from the law, but that which comes through faith in Christ, the righteousness from God that depends on faith” (Philippians 3:8-9; Rom. 3:22, 4:1-5, 9:30-32, 10:1-4).

Proud, self-righteous people don’t understand that Christ is the only Savior, not a co-Savior to help you save yourself.

    “I am the LORD, and besides me there is no savior” (Is. 43:11; cf. Hos. 13:4; 1 Jn. 4:14).

Proud, self-righteous people don’t understand that if we could earn salvation, then Christ didn’t need to die to pay for our sins.

    “I do not set aside the grace of God, for if righteousness could be gained through the law, Christ died for nothing” (Gal. 2:21).

Gospel means “good news.” Salvation by God’s free grace is good news. Salvation by works is bad news. Example: Unhappy nuns. Works salvation = joylessness (Gal. 4:15). Grace salvation = joy (Gal. 5:22). Salvation is by God’s unearned grace, not earned by your works.

    “For by grace you have been saved through faith. And this is not your own doing; it is the gift of God, not a result of works, so that no one may boast” (Eph. 2:8; cf. Rom. 11:5-6; 2 Tim. 1:8-9; Tit. 3:5).

Proud, self-righteous people don’t think they’re sinners who need to turn away from sin. But, God rejoices over sinners who turn from sin to Him…

Christ came to save both non-religious sinners and religious sinners. If you’re a proud, self-righteous person, go to God right now just like the lost son did. Humble yourself before Him, confess your sin, and offer to serve Him as your Lord. Then, He will hug you, kiss you, and rejoice over you.

(Most Bible quotes are from the New International Version, 1978.
Some quotes are the author’s paraphrases.)

Edited 12/20/09

Best Blogs Digest - March 2009

April 1st, 2009

By Greg Gibson

Time Magazine’s 10 Ideas Changing the World: The New Calvinism
“Neo-Calvinist ministers and authors don’t operate quite on a Rick Warren scale. But, notes Ted Olsen, a managing editor at Christianity Today, “Everyone knows where the energy and the passion are in the Evangelical world” — with the pioneering new-Calvinist John Piper of Minneapolis, Seattle’s pugnacious Mark Driscoll, and Albert Mohler, head of the Southern Seminary of the huge Southern Baptist Convention. The Calvinist-flavored ESV Study Bible sold out its first printing, and Reformed blogs like Between Two Worlds are among cyber-Christendom’s hottest links.” The New Calvinism by Time Magazine

What Issues a Pastor Can and Can’t Live With
“…what things can I and can’t I live with as a pastor? Let me throw out a bunch of different examples that are relevant to my particular situation: organs, female elders, universalism, altar calls, humor, multi-site campuses, drums, the KJV, stained glass, racism, infant baptism, no formal membership, sermons limited to 10 minutes, large and high pulpits, TV studio-like acoustics. My goal in what follows is not to give you a sacrosanct playbook, but to illustrate how I go about thinking through practical matters. Let’s take each one in order.” What I Can and Cannot Live With as a Pastor by Mark Dever

Don’t Waste Your Suffering
When God enrolls you in His School of Suffering, listen well, learn the lessons, and pass the course, lest He make you repeat it. How to Pray for Joni Eareckson Tada

Six Personalities Deaf to God’s Word
The #1 reason that we don’t hear God’s Word is unrepentant sin. Sometimes that sin manifests itself in different personalities. Six Personalities That Deflect God’s Word by James Adams

How to Evangelize Your Children
I heard part of this series on the radio, and it was excellent:

“1. Genuine Salvation: More Than a Prayer
2. How Children Come to Faith in Christ
3. Taking Our Children to Church: Is That Enough?
4. How to Deal With Doubt
5. Observing Salvation in Your Child: What Does It Look Like?
6. The Family: No Better Place to Come to Know Christ!”

“I cannot recommend these talks enough to any parent wanting to be thoughtful, careful, and prayerful in the salvation of their children.” Audio and transcripts: How Children Come to Faith in Christ by Jim Eliff

Did the Holy Spirit Replace the Law?
This is a previous article that I edited and expanded. No, the Spirit (alone) didn’t replace the law. But, Jesus Christ’s Person, works (including His Spirit), and words fulfill the Law. Did the Holy Spirit Replace the Law? by Greg Gibson

Best Blogs Digest - Feb. 2009

March 1st, 2009

Jesus Is Better Than Whatever You Were Saved From
“Jesus is better than whatever you were saved from. Don’t go back.” Jesus is Better: Hebrews for Modern-day Christians by Dave Marriott

The Gospel Is the Cure
“Two Americans. One is a practicing homosexual and proud of it. The other is a practicing Baptist and proud of it. One trusts his feelings, the other trusts his actions. Both are in desperate need of Jesus for pretty much the same reason. This is how wonderful the gospel of Jesus is. It’s the skeleton key for all of humanity…We all exhibit a multitude of symptoms for our conditions, running the gamut from self-indulgent immorality to self-satisfying morality. Opposite ends of the spectrum and everywhere in between. Whatever your symptoms, the gospel is the answer.” The Gospel Is the Antidote for Everything by Jared Wilson

God’s Attributes Revealed in the Gospel
Want to know what God is like? Understand the gospel. The Attributes of God and the Glory of the Gospel by J. I. Packer

The Neo-Reformed Controversy
Scot McKnight charges some Calvinists with being “Neo-Reformed.” Trevin Wax gave the most balanced response. Thoughts on the Neo-Reformed by Trevin Wax

Is Your Church an Institution?
The difference between institutions vs. institutionalism. “Your church is an institution. Don’t be embarrassed by that. But guard and improve your institution, so that its gospel purpose — that people would meet with Christ, go deep, and never stop growing in him — so that that larger purpose is served.” Is Your Church an Institution by Ray Ortlund

Roman Catholic Indulgences Resurrected
Roman Catholic churches have resurrected the practice of indulgences. (At least they’re no longer selling them.) “At the core of indulgences is sin, which can either lead to eternal punishment — i.e., hell — or time spent in purgatory, a place of suffering where imperfections are scrubbed away in preparation for entering heaven. Confession erases eternal punishment, but temporal punishment remains. Plenary, or full, indulgences are the equivalent of a get-out-of-purgatory-free card. Partial indulgences simply shorten your stay…The essence of plenary indulgences is tricky to nail down. They’re granted if you meet specific criteria: go to confession, receive communion, pray for the Pope, visit a particular shrine.” Praise God, Jesus is enough! Why Catholic Indulgences Are Making a Comeback by Time Magazine

The Top 10 Religious States in the U.S.
See the top 10 and bottom 10 most religious states. (Hint: The Bible belt wins, and the Northeast loses.) State of the States: Importance of Religion by the Gallup Poll

The Top 10 Countries for Christian Persecution
1. North Korea, 2. Saudi Arabia, 3… WWL: Focus on the Top Ten by Open Doors

Pray for Our Persecuted Brothers
Receive prayer requests for persecuted Christians by subscribing at the bottom of the page Barnabus Fund

“Best Blogs Digest” Jan. - 2009

February 1st, 2009
by Greg Gibson

30 Christian Marriage Books Reviewed
“Which book do you use for pre-marital counseling? Which for married couples with problems? What’s the best all around book on marriage? Questions like these prompted us to devise the Marriage Book Comparison Chart, which includes both a rating comparison chart and a brief review for thirty books on marriage.” Marriage Book Reviews Marriage Books Comparison Chart by 9Marks Ministries.

8 Children’s Bibles Reviewed
“Let me remind you of the four criteria I judged the Bibles on: 1) faithfulness to the biblical text; 2) applicability to toddlers; 3) illustrations; 4) ability to convey redemptive history.” Toddler Bibles Reviewed Part I and Part II by John Beeson at the Council on Christian Manhood and Womanhood.

Understand the Bible’s Story: Read the OT Books in the Jews’ Order
“…does the reorganization of the books of the OT make it harder for people to understand the over-arching message of the OT?…The order we use today seems to have arisen with the printing press. There is no ancient precedent for the order of the Old Testament books we find in our English translations…To summarize: We should accept the tripartite division of the OT into Law, Prophets, and Writings, and we should order English translations of the books of the OT accordingly because (1) the order in use by English translations now does not match the orders of the books in lists drawn up by early church fathers; (2) Protestants have agreed with Hebrew tradition rather than Septuagint tradition on which books should be included between the covers of the Bible, so Protestants should also agree with Hebrew tradition on how those books should be arranged; and (3) this is the order that Jesus endorsed and that Matthew and Luke apparently expected their audiences to recognize…everything written about me in the Law of Moses and the Prophets and the Psalms must be fulfilled. This statement indicates that when Jesus thought of the Old Testament, he thought of three sections. Those three sections broadly match the order of the Old Testament books in Hebrew Bibles today” How Should the Books of the OT Be Ordered? by Jim Hamilton

Perhaps you’ll understand the Bible’s message more clearly if you try reading it in the order that the Jews arranged it here.

Does Denying the Covenant of Works Undermine Justification by Faith?
“…the early covenant theologians did not construe this Adamic administration as a covenant, far less as a covenant of works. Reformed creeds of the 16th century such as the French Confession (1559), the Scottish Confession (1560), the Belgic Confession (1561), the Thirty-Nine Articles (1562), the Heidelberg Catechism (1563), and the Second Helvetic (1566) do not exhibit any such construction of the Edenic institution…The most famous example of a Reformed theologian denying the covenant of works is that of John Murray…Neither Luther nor his followers ever connected the doctrine of justification by faith with the notion of a Covenant of Works.” The Covenant of Works: A Litmus Test for Reformed Theology? by Ralph Allan Smith

What % of Your Charitable Donation Really Goes to Ministry?
Ever wonder how much of your donations really reach the needy, instead of CEO’s and support staff? Would you like to know the salary of your favorite charity’s CEO? Find it here…
Charity Navigator
Economic Research Institute
Guidestar
Ministry Watch

Robert Schuller’s Crystal Cathedral Cracking?
A family disagreement and the economy threaten to collapse Robert Schuller’s empire. Family Spat Divides Televangelism Empire

Penal Substitution and Isaiah 53 (Sermon Notes)

January 5th, 2009
Penal Substitution and Isaiah 53 (Sermon Notes)

“Jesus Carried Our Sins”
(Isaiah 52:13 - 53:12)

By Greg Gibson

Problem: God’s justice must punish us, but His love desired to forgive us.

Solution: Penal substitution (substitutionary atonement) by God Himself paying our penalty.

Only the God-man, Jesus, could qualify as the substitute.

    Animal sacrifices couldn’t take away sin: “it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins” (Heb. 10:4).

    Mere human sacrifice couldn’t take away sin: “No man can redeem the life of another or give to God a ransom for him” (Ps. 49:7).

Pictures of penalties paid by a human substitute:

    1. Billion dollar debt paid by the lender.

    2. Murderer judged guilty and given the death penalty, but paid by the judge.

Old Testament pictures of Christ’s sacrifice by substitution:

    1. Adam and Eve: God made clothes of skin to cover Adam and Eve’s guilt (Gen. 3:21, cf. 3:7).

    2. Abraham and Isaac: “He went over and took the ram and sacrificed it as a burnt offering instead of his son” (Gen. 22:7-14).

    3. Israel’s Passover: God saw the blood and passed over in judgment (Ex. 12:13, 23, 27). “Christ our Passover lamb has been sacrificed” (1 Cor. 5:7).

Isaiah 53 is a Messianic prophecy from ~700 B.C., yet fulfilled in the 1st century. (Evidence that God wrote Scripture through men.)

The “servant” in 52:13 and 53:11 is the same Messiah prophesied earlier in Isaiah:

    “The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and will call him Immanuel (God with us)” (Is. 7:14).

    “For to us a child is born, to us a son is given, and the government will be on his shoulders. And he will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (Is. 9:6).

1. Messiah Will Suffer, Yet Be Exalted (Isaiah 52:13 – 53:3)

“Did not the Christ have to suffer these things and then enter his glory?” (Lk. 24:26).

“And they struck him in the face” (Jn. 19:3; Mt. 26:67, 27:30).

“He came to that which was his own, but his own did not receive him” (Jn. 1:11).

“…and became obedient to death - even death on a cross! Therefore God exalted him to the highest place and gave him the name that is above every name” (Phil. 2:8-9).

“Exalted to the right hand of God” (Acts 2:33).

2. Messiah Will Be Punished as Our Substitute (Isaiah 53:4-6)

Penal substitution: “Surely he took up our weaknesses and carried our sorrows, yet we considered him stricken by God, smitten by him, and afflicted. But he was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities; the punishment that brought us peace was on him…and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all” (53:4-6).

“He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed. For you were like sheep going astray” (1 Pet. 2:24).

“God made him who had no sin to be sin for us, so that in him we might become the righteousness of God” (2 Cor. 5:21).

“the Lord Jesus Christ, who gave himself for our sins” (Gal. 1:3-4).

*Application: Next time you’re tempted to sin, remember that Jesus carried your sins (your anger, hatred, pride, boasting, lying, stealing, lust, sexual immorality, idolatry).

Penal substitution: “And by his wounds we are healed” (53:5).

    “He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, so that we might die to sins and live for righteousness; by his wounds you have been healed. For you were like sheep going astray” (1 Pet. 2:24).

    Not a guarantee of healing in the atonement. Context of Is. 53:5 and 1 Pet. 2:24 is spiritual healing, not physical healing. Sickness is used as a metaphor for sin.

3. Messiah Will Be Like a Perfect Sacrificial Lamb (Isaiah 53:7-9)

Penal substitution: “For the sin of my people he was struck.”

“For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but we have one who has been tempted in every way, just as we are - yet was without sin” (Heb. 4:15).

“Such a high priest meets our need - one who is holy, blameless, pure set apart from sinners, exalted above the heavens” (Heb. 7:26).

“John saw Jesus coming toward him and said, ‘Look, the Lamb of God, who takes away the sin of the world!” (Jn. 1:29).

“Then I saw a Lamb, looking as if it had been killed, standing in the center of the throne” (Rev. 5:6).

4. God the Father Planned Messiah’s Mission (Isaiah 53:10)

“Yet it was the LORD’s will to crush him and cause him to suffer”

“This man was handed over to you by God’s set purpose and foreknowledge” (Acts 2:23).

“He sent his one and only Son into the world that we might live through him” (1 Jn. 4:9).

5. Messiah’s Mission Will Succeed (Isaiah 53:11-12)

“After the suffering of his soul, he will see the light of life and be satisfied…Therefore I will give him a portion among the great, and he will divide the spoils with the strong.”

Penal substitution: “he will carry their sins…For he carried the sin of many, and made intercession for the transgressors.”

*Application

False Substitutes That Can’t Pay Your Penalty: Baptism, church membership, church attendance, trying to be good.

Only one of 2 people can pay for your sins: You, or God Himself

“Seek the LORD while he may be found; call on him while he is near. Let the wicked forsake his way and the evil man his thought. Let him turn to the LORD, and he will have mercy on him, and to our God, for he will freely pardon” (Is. 55:6-7).

Best Blogs Digest - Dec. 2008

January 3rd, 2009
By Greg Gibson

Top 10 Theology Stories of 2008
Study Bibles, the Shack, Anglicanism, and more: Theology News by Collin Hansen

The Emerging Church’s False Dichotomies and False Synonyms
Is the gospel about a person only, but not a message? If you’ve wondered what all the controversy is about the Emerging Church, here’s a brief explanation: The Emerging Church by Timothy Stoner

Baptistic, Calvinistic, and Non-Confessional
“Therefore, let’s rejoice that Christ is being preached and souls are being drawn to a Big God. Instead of a stooge-like ‘Bah humbug,’ let’s offer up a ‘Hip, hip, hurrah’ that John Calvin, Jonathan Edwards, and Charles Spurgeon are becoming the ‘homeboys’ of a younger generation.” Young, Restless, and Reformed by Bob Gonzales

John MacArthur’s Bible Study Guides
Read the written transcripts from John MacArthur’s sermons: Bible Studies by John MacArthur

“5 Types of Sermons”

December 30th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

There’s a new chart at JesusSaidFollowMe titled 5 Types of Sermons

Best Blogs Digest - November 2008

November 28th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

Bible Commentary Ratings
Before you buy Bible commentaries, find out which ones reviewers rate highest. The top commentaries are ranked with reviews by Don Carson, Tremper Longman, John Glynn, John Piper, Denver Seminary, and readers like you. BestCommentaries.com

Free, Online Encylopedia of Christianity and Theology
Find answers to theology questions from 1615+ articles. Theopedia.com

Free, Online Bible Atlas
Select a Bible book and chapter (like Eph. 1), then see the location on Google map or satellite. BibleMap.org

“Predestined to What?” by Russell Moore
“Why do so many people who say they believe in the doctrine of election spend their lives with such anxiety?..If you are not more evangelistic now than you were when you came to understand the doctrine of election, you never understood the doctrine of election.” An edifying, big picture view of election in the context of God’s eternal plan. Predestined to What? (Rom. 8:26-9:6) by Russell Moore

“Power in Preaching” by Ray Ortlund, Jr.
Learn how to preach. Power in Preaching: Desire (1 Thes. 1:2-5).
“Our greatest breakthrough to spiritual power will come through the worst experience of our lives…when Paul broke through to new power in his ministry. That happened, the real breakthrough when God took him to another level, that happened in the worst experience of his life, getting that thorn in the flesh, and then learning to live with it.” Power in Preaching: Delight (2 Cor. 12:1-10).
“A crucified Savior can be preached in Divine power only by crucified preachers…Have you decided yet to be uncool?…Have you decided who all this about? Have you decided who all this is for?” Power in Preaching: Decide (1 Cor. 2:1-5).

John MacArthur’s Sermons, Free
Bold, faithful preaching. Just the Word, nothing fancy. John MacArthur sermons

John Stott’s Sermons, Free
Very edifying preaching, clear and easy to understand. John Stott sermons

Best Blogs Digest - Oct. 2008

October 20th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

God’s Law Defined and Defended in Redemptive History
“Thesis: The purpose of this paper is to determine the present relevance of the law of God. In brief, it is designed to show that the law of God is presently (and in every age) binding upon the believer and that while this law formed the basis of the Mosaic legislation, the two are not to be confused. Moreover, in the outworking of His plan God may choose to give His law under various codifications, but God’s law reflects eternal principles of righteousness which always constitute a rule of life…It would seem evident that the only laws relevant to the believer’s standard of conduct today are those of the New Testament. If the Old Covenant is abolished it would be wrong to impose it as the rule for life today. If today’s believer is now under the terms of the New Covenant, he must look to see what the terms of this New Covenant are; indeed, it would be illegitimate to look elsewhere. The Continuing Relevance of Divine Law by Fred Zaspel

One-Page Overview of the Bible
God’s People, God’s Place, and God’s Rule by Chad Knudson

Why Some Reformed Preachers YELL!
“If I am preaching to New Covenant converted believers as though they were Old Covenant unconverted Jews, then I am not being faithful.” Perhaps this problem grows out of Covenant Theology’s one Covenant of Grace doctrine, where the New Covenant is merely a newer administration of the Old Covenant. Old Testament Prophets in New Covenant Pulpits by James Sevastio

Seeker Sensitive Pastor Repents
A seeker-sensitive church member complained to his pastor, “I’m not being fed.” And, instead of shifting the blame to the member, this pastor repented. Confessions of a “Not Being Fed” Pastor

An Example of a Godly Wife
Rejoice in the Wife of Your Youth by Ray Ortlund

What’s Your Excuse for Not Serving the Lord More?
“Spurgeon, so it happens, was a lot sicker than me for most of his life. He was seriously and often crippingly and painfully ill, both mentally (with depression) and physically, from his mid-30s until his death from illnesses at age 57…Most weeks, and as just a sample of some of his regular duties, Spurgeon wrote, delivered and published a weekly sermon; looked after an orphanage, a pastor’s college and an almshouse; read and responded personally to 500 letters; and preached up to 10 times in churches that he had started.” And, that’s just the tip of the iceberg. See his additional work for the Lord here: Spurgeon for the Sick and Afflicted

Tour the Land of Israel From Your Computer
“BiblePlaces.com features photographs and descriptions of sites in Israel, Jordan, Egypt, Turkey and Greece with an emphasis on biblical archaeology, geography and history.” See BiblePlaces.com, and especially this Slide Show.

Search Inside the Book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”

October 20th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

150x199.jpgIf you’ve wondered what’s in the book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”, wonder no more. Now, with the help of Google Book Search, you can search up to 20% of the book’s pages.

Two good places to start are the Subject Index (p. 153) and Author Index (p. 155, which includes several interesting quotes). Start searching here: New Covenant Theology

“ALL Old Covenant or Old Testament Laws Cancelled?”

October 6th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

Most Christians believe that the Sabbath command is cancelled. And, some believe that all Old Covenant laws are cancelled, including the whole Decalogue. So, why do I believe that all Old Testament laws are cancelled?

In my book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled” I devoted 3 chapters to explaining why the laws from Genesis - Sinai are cancelled. Here are the 3 chapter titles…

13. Since Genesis Is Part of the Law, the Commands From Genesis – Sinai Are Cancelled (Genesis is part of the law as revelation, not as covenant which started later at Sinai.)

16. The Church Is Built on the Foundation of New Testament Apostles and Prophets’ Teaching (Eph. 2:19-20ff., cf. 3:5, 4:11)

17. Archaeology Testifies That the Bible Contains 2 Separate Canons (Rules) (The Old Covenant’s structure has several parallels to ancient, near-Eastern treaties, which included historical introductions. Genesis appears to be the historical introduction to the Old Covenant law of Moses.)

Here is Chapter 13 in its entirety…

“Did you know that Genesis is part of the law as revelation (Old Testament?) Here are 4 reasons showing why Genesis is part of the law…

1. Genesis 21 is called “the law” in Galatians 4:21-22.

    “Tell me, you who desire to be under the law, do you not listen to the law? For it is written that Abraham had two sons: one by a slave woman and one by a free woman” (Gal. 4:21-22 referring to Gen. 21; cf. Rom. 3:31ff.)

2. The phrase “law and prophets” means “Genesis – Malachi” (the whole Old Testament).

3. Moses wrote the book of Genesis.

4. Archaeology testifies that Genesis is the historical introduction to the Old Covenant canon. God patterned the Old Covenant’s literary structure with some similarities to ancient, near-Eastern treaties, which included an historical introduction before the actual covenant document.

Ancient covenants were put into effect with a surrounding body of literature, a.k.a. canon. Covenant produces canon. Our Bible is made of 2 major covenants, the Old and New covenants, each surrounded by its own canon, the Old and New Testaments.

(To understand this more, see The Structure of Biblical Authority in #17 below…)

So, when the New Testament says the law is cancelled, that includes Genesis, not just post-Sinai commands.” (Excerpted from the book: “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”, 24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Cancelled, And All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience, by Greg Gibson, p. 86)

“Did the Holy Spirit Replace the Law?”

October 6th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

Did the Holy Spirit replace the law of Moses? Some Christians have concluded that based on Gal. 5:18 and Rom. 7:6. (Yet, perhaps a better term to describe the relationship between the law of Moses and the Spirit is “contrast” instead of “replace.”)

So, does the Spirit contrast the law of Moses? Yes, but we need to be careful not to read the word “only” into Gal. 5:18 and Rom. 7:6, since the law of Moses is contrasted with at least 7 other truths…

8 Contrasts to the Law of Moses

1. The Law of Moses vs. the Spirit

    “But if you are led by the Spirit, you are not under the law” (Gal. 5:18).

    “But now we are released from the law, having died to that which held us captive, so that we serve not under the old written code but in the new life of the Spirit” (Rom. 7:6).

2. The Law of Moses vs. Grace and Truth

    “For the law was given through Moses, grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (Jn. 1:17).

3. The Law of Moses vs. Faith

    “Now before faith came, we were held captive under the law, imprisoned until the coming faith would be revealed…But now that faith has come, we are no longer under a guardian…” (Gal. 3:23-25; cf. justification 3:11-12, 24-25, and righteousness 3:21).

4. The Law of Moses vs. Adoption

    “But when the fullness of time had come, God sent forth his Son, born of woman, born under the law, to redeem those who are under the law, so that we might receive adoption as sons” (Gal. 4:4-5).

5. The Law of Moses vs. Christ’s Priesthood

    “Now if perfection had been attainable through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need would there have been for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, rather than one named after the order of Aaron? For when there is a change in the priesthood, there is necessarily a change in the law as well” (Heb. 7:11-12).

    “For the law appoints men in their weakness as high priests, but the word of the oath, which came later than the law, appoints a Son who has been made perfect forever” (Heb. 7:28).

6. The Law of Moses vs. a Better Hope of Approaching God

    “On the one hand, a former commandment is set aside because of its weakness and uselessness (for the law made nothing perfect); but on the other hand, a better hope is introduced, through which we draw near to God” (Heb. 7:18-19).

7. The Law of Moses vs. Christ’s Sacrifice

    “…’You have neither desired nor taken pleasure in sacrifices and offerings and burnt offerings and sin offerings’ (these are offered according to the law), then he added, ‘Behold, I have come to do your will. He abolishes the first in order to establish the second. And by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all” (Heb. 10:8-10, cf. 1ff.).

8. The Law of Moses vs. the Law of Christ

    “To those under the law I became as one under the law (though not being myself under the law) that I might win those under the law. To those outside the law I became as one outside the law (not being outside the law of God but under the law of Christ) that I might win those outside the law” (1 Cor. 9:20-21).

(This is not to imply that there were no Spirit, faith, grace and truth during the law of Moses. Few Israelites possessed saving faith or the indwelling Spirit. But, all New Covenant saints have faith in Christ and the indwelling Spirit.)

It’s important to understand that all 8 points above contrast the Old Covenant law of Moses (not all law including the New Covenant law of Christ) to New Covenant truths. The law of Christ is even distinguished and affirmed in one of those contrasts (1 Cor. 9:20-21). And, the context of Galatians “criticizes” the law of Moses in redemptive history. Plus, Galatians gives several commands, and also affirms the law of Christ…

    “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ.” (Gal. 6:2)

Jesus Christ the New Lawgiver has a law inspired and written by the Spirit in the New Testament and on our hearts, for His people who have faith in Christ, who are adopted by the Father, and led by the Spirit.

So no, the Spirit (alone) didn’t replace the law. The Spirit is only one of 8 contrasts vs. the law of Moses.

Perhaps these 8 contrasts also help us understand how Christ fulfills the Law and Prophets. He fulfills them by everything He is, does, and teaches; by His Person, His works (including His Sprit), and His words (including His commands).

Here’s how I explained it in my book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”

“Moses’ Law Prepared Unjustified, Spirit-Less Slaves for Christ’s 1st Coming

One reason why God gave the law of Moses to Israel was to tutor/prepare them for Messiah’s 1st coming, so they might be justified by faith, adopted, and Spirit indwelled. But now, we don’t need the Mosaic law to tutor/prepare us because Messiah has already come, we are justified by faith (Gal. 3:23-25), adopted (Gal. 3:26 - 4:7), and Spirit-indwelled (Gal. 5:18).

Christ’s Law Helps Prepare Justified, Spirit-Indwelled Heirs for His 2nd Coming

Moses’ law prepared unjustified, Spirit-less slaves for Christ’s 1st coming. But, Christ’s law helps prepare justified, Spirit-indwelled heirs for His 2nd coming.”

(“ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”, 24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Cancelled, And All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience, by Greg Gibson, pp. 118.)

Edited April 1, 2009

“What Is the Law of Christ?”

October 3rd, 2008

(The following is a free excerpt from the book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled” by Greg Gibson)

The Bible Never Criticizes the Law of Christ, But Praises It

Some Covenant Theologians think that the law of Christ = the law of Moses. However, does the law of Christ include, “…nor shall you wear a garment of cloth made of two kinds of material?” (Lev. 19:19). And, does the Law of Moses include, “Make disciples of all nations, baptizing them…?” (Mt. 28:19). No, the law of Moses and the law of Christ obviously refer to 2 different time periods in redemptive history.

The Bible criticizes the law of Moses, but never the law of Christ. In fact, the Bible praises the law of Christ…

Christ Is a New Lawgiver, Not Just a Law Keeper:
See the “12 New Commands From Christ’s New Law” below.

Messiah’s Law Is for the Gentiles:
“…He will bring forth justice to the nations…the coastlands shall wait for His law” (Is. 42:1, 4).

Christians Are Not Lawless, But In-Lawed to Christ:
“…not being without law of God, but in-lawed (Gk.) to Christ…” (1 Cor. 9:21).

We Must Fulfill the Law of Christ:
“Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” (Gal. 6:2).

What exactly is the law of Christ? Scripture doesn’t tell us. But, it may be all laws given by Christ and His apostles in the New Testament. Doug Moo thinks that in addition to those laws it includes the Holy Spirit’s enablement and the motivation of love…

    “It is more difficult to determine whether the law of Christ includes specific teachings and principles. Many deny that this is the case, but their reasons for doing so often betray a bias against finding any specific demands as binding on Christians. The work of Schrage and others has shown that Paul and the other apostles were quite willing to impose specific commandments on their charges; and these commandments were, in fact, often drawn from, or reflective of, Jesus’ own teachings. For these reasons, I think it is highly probable that Paul thought of the law of Christ as including within it the teachings of Jesus and the apostolic witness, based on his life and teaching, about what it means to reverence God in daily life. This is not, however, to deny the importance of love or the direction of the Spirit. The ‘law of Christ,’ Paul’s shorthand expression for that form of God’s law applicable to new covenant believers, includes all these. Longenecker’s succinct summary says it well: The law of Christ stands in Paul’s thought for those ‘prescriptive principles stemming from the heart of the gospel (usually embodied in the example and teachings of Jesus), which are meant to be applied to specific situations by the direction and enablement of the Holy Spirit, being always motivated and conditioned by love.’”

Moo may be right. But, it’s not important whether the phrase “law of Christ” includes Christ’s laws alone, or also the Holy Sprit and love, since we agree they’re included in the New Testament, and crucial for obedience. Remember, this book focuses on which laws to obey (N.T.), more than how to obey (the Holy Spirit’s grace) and why to obey (love). Even as the law of Moses functioned as both regulation and revelation, so may the law of Christ.

(Excerpted from the book: “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”
24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Cancelled, And All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience, by Greg Gibson, pp. 121-122.)

“The Law Written on the Heart”

October 3rd, 2008

(The following is a free excerpt from the book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled” by Greg Gibson)

Objection: “But the New Covenant Law Is Written in the Heart, Not the New Testament”

Since the New Covenant law is written in the heart (Heb. 8:10), does that mean that it’s not also written in the New Testament?

Let’s explore what the words “write on the heart” mean by surveying parallel verses. We find the idea of “writing on the heart” at least 6 times in Scripture…

“Write My Laws on the Heart” and “Bind Them on the Body”
Means “Keep My Commands”

    1. “My son, do not forget my teaching, but let your heart keep my commandments, for length of days and years of life and peace they will add to you. Let not steadfast love and faithfulness forsake you; bind them around your neck; write them on the tablet of your heart” (Pr. 3:1-3).

    2. “My son, keep my words and treasure up my commandments with you; keep my commandments and live; keep my teaching as the apple of your eye; bind them on your fingers; write them on the tablet of your heart” (Pr. 7:1-3).

Sin (Disobedience to God’s Law) Can Be Written on the Heart

    3. “The sin of Judah is written with a pen of iron, with a point of diamond it is engraved on the tablet of their heart, and on the horns of their altars, while their children remember their altars and their Asherim” (Jer. 17:1-2).

“Put My Laws in Their Hearts/Minds” Results in Obedience

    4.-5. “I will put my law within them, and I will write it on their hearts. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people” (Jer. 31:33; cf. Heb. 8:10).

“Written on Our Heart” Likely Means “Loved by Us”

    6. “You yourselves are our letter of recommendation, written on our hearts (loved by us), to be known and read by all. And you show that you are a letter from Christ delivered by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human hearts” (2 Cor. 3:2-3).

In addition to those 6 passages, there are at least 3 similar passages about binding God’s commands on the heart and body. This is significant because in Pr. 3:3 and 7:3 above, “write commands on the tablet of your heart” = “bind them around your neck/ fingers” = “keep My commands.” So, writing on the heart, binding on the body, and obeying are likely synonyms from Hebrew parallelism.

Binding God’s Commands on the Heart/Body
Is a Metaphor for Obeying His Commands

    “My son, keep your father’s commandment, and forsake not your mother’s teaching. Bind them on your heart always; tie them around your neck” (Pr. 6:20-21; cf. 1:9).

    “You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your might. And these words that I command you today shall be on your heart…You shall bind them as a sign on your hand…” (Deut. 6:4-8).

    “And if you will indeed obey my commandments…You shall therefore lay up these words of mine in your heart and in your soul, and you shall bind them as a sign on your hand, and they shall be as frontlets between your eyes. You shall teach them to your children…” (Deut. 11:13, 18-19).

The Old Covenant Law
Was In Regenerate Saints’ Hearts and the Old Testament

    “And these words that I command you today shall be on your heart” (Deut. 6:6).

    “You shall therefore lay up these words of mine in your heart and in your soul…” (Deut. 11:18).

    “I desire to do your will, O my God; your law is within my heart” (Ps. 40:8).

    “I have stored up your word in my heart, that I might not sin against you” (Ps. 119:11).

Antinomianism errs by reading the word “only” into Heb. 8:10, like this, “I will put my laws into their minds, and write them (ONLY) on their hearts (not in the New Testament)…”

Remember earlier, we saw that Old Covenant saints probably already had all 7 New Covenant blessings from Jer. 31:31-34, including the law written both in their hearts and the Old Testament. So, New Covenant saints can also have the New Covenant law of Christ written both in their hearts and the New Testament.

In Hebrew and Greek, the heart is the center of the mind, emotions, will, desires, etc. So, God writing His New Covenant law in our hearts is a metaphor meaning He will regenerate our hearts to remember, love, and obey His laws.

Plus, since the law in the heart is a metaphor, we need to be careful about trying to reason additional doctrine from it. The hermeneutics of metaphor will not allow us to reason, “Since God’s law is written in the heart, therefore it is not written in the New Testament.”

Metaphors communicate that A is like B in some ways, but not all ways. So, beware of pressing a metaphor’s details since it’s designed to illustrate only some truths. Metaphors, parables, and types are all designed to symbolize major themes, not details.

In conclusion, God writing His laws on our hearts has nothing to do with content or location, that is, the heart instead of the New Testament. “…God’s love has been poured into our hearts…” (Rom. 5:5) does not mean that His love is not also recorded in Scripture. He wrote His law in the New Testament, and made it precious to our regenerate hearts, guaranteeing our obedience.

(Excerpted from the book: “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”
24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Cancelled, And All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience, by Greg Gibson, pp. 115-117.)

“Not Under Law, But Under Grace”

October 3rd, 2008

(The following is a free excerpt from the book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled” by Greg Gibson)

Objection: “But We’re Not Under Law, But Under Grace”

Yes, we’re not under law, but under grace. But, what does that mean? (By the way, the Bible never contrasts law and gospel. But, it contrasts law and grace twice.) Here are the 2 key passages…

    “Do not present your members to sin as instruments for unrighteousness, but present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life, and your members to God as instruments for righteousness. For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace. What then? Are we to sin because we are not under law but under grace? By no means! Do you not know that if you present yourselves to anyone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience, which leads to righteousness?” (Rom. 6:14-15).

    “And from his fullness we have all received, grace upon grace. For the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (Jn. 1:16).

What do those 2 passages tell us about law and grace? Here are 3 clear facts about law and grace…

    1. The relationship between law and grace is a contrast, not a comparison. (See the word “but” in Rom. 6.)

    2. In John 1:16, law and grace refer to 2 different times in redemptive history: Law was from the time of Moses – Christ (~1445 B.C. - 30 A.D.) and grace is from the time of Christ – the end (~30 A.D. - the end). Therefore, not under law, but under grace refers to redemption accomplished for the corporate Church in the 1st century, not the time of Moses.

    3. In Rom. 6:14, law and grace refer to 2 different lifestyles: sin vs. obedience. (Most in Israel were characterized by sin, but all in the Church are characterized by obedience.) Therefore, not under law, but under grace also refers to redemption applied to individuals in the 1st - 21st centuries.

Some historic Dispensationalists believed there was no grace during the time of law. But, that view is easily disproved by a simple, concordance topical word study…

    “But Noah found grace in the eyes of the LORD” (Gen. 6:8).

    “…you (Moses) have found grace in My sight” (Ex. 33:12).

    “Toward the scorners He is scornful, but to the humble He gives grace” (Prov. 3:34).

And, some modern Antinomians believe there is no law during the time of grace. However, that view is also easily disproved from a concordance…

    “Bear one another’s burdens, and so fulfill the law of Christ” (Gal. 6:2).

    “I will put my laws into their minds, and write them on their hearts…” (Heb. 8:10).

    “He will bring forth justice to the nations…coastlands shall wait for His law” (Is. 42:1, 4).

    “Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them…teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you….” (Mt. 28:19-20; cf. Jn. 14:15, 14:21, 15:10; Acts 1:2; 1 Th. 4:2; 1 Cor. 7:19; 1 Jn. 2:3, 3:22, 3:24, 5:2-3; 2 Jn. 6; Rev. 12:17).

Therefore, just as there was grace during the time of law, so there is law during the time of grace. There are grace and truth in the Old Testament, and law in the New Testament. Whatever it means to be under grace today, does not exclude laws.

So then, what exactly does it mean to be under law vs. under grace? It probably means to be under the authority of one of 2 covenants…

    • The covenant from ~1445 B.C. - 30 A.D. vs. the covenant from ~30 A.D. - the end
    • The covenant characterized by sin vs. the covenant characterized by obedience
    • The law covenant vs. the grace covenant
    • The Old Covenant vs. the New Covenant

Why then, is the Old Covenant called “law,” and the New Covenant called “grace?” Here is the likely reason…

Old Covenant “sanctification” blessings were based on law (works), while New Covenant blessings are based on promise (grace).

(Excerpted from the book: “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”
24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Cancelled, And All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience, by Greg Gibson, pp. 109-111.)

“Everything the New Testament Says About the Whole Decalogue”

October 2nd, 2008

(The following is a free excerpt from the book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled” by Greg Gibson)

Only 3 Passages, All Negative

As we saw above, the Holy Spirit never uses the names “Ten Commandments” or “moral law” in the New Testament. As a matter of fact, there are only 3 New Testament passages that definitely refer to the whole Decalogue, and they’re all negative…

1. “The letter,” “letters on stone,” and “tablets of stone” (2 Cor. 3:6-9) are:

• Not where the Spirit writes (2 Cor. 3:3)
• (What) kills (2 Cor. 3:6)
• A ministry of death (2 Cor. 3:7)
• A ministry of condemnation (2 Cor. 3:9)

2. “The handwriting of ordinances” (Col. 2:14) was:

• Blotted out (Col. 2:14)
• Taken away (Col. 2:14)
• Nailed to the cross (Col. 2:14)

3. “The tablets of the covenant” (Heb. 9:4) are:

• Obsolete (Heb. 8:13)
• Growing old (Heb. 8:13)
• Ready to vanish.” (Heb. 8:13)

(Excerpted from the book: “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”
24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Cancelled, And All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience, by Greg Gibson, p. 25.)

“The 12 Names for the Decalogue”

October 2nd, 2008

(The following is a free excerpt from the book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled” by Greg Gibson)

The 12 Names for the Decalogue in All 56 Verses:
“Ten Commandments” Only 3 Times (Zero in the N.T.)

When you hear the words, “Ten Commandments,” what’s the first thought that comes to your mind? If you automatically think, “The moral law of God,” then your view is very different from God’s view.

Depending on how you classify them, the whole Decalogue and its synonyms appear ~56 times in Scripture. (We’ll exclude the names “ark of the covenant,” “ark of the testimony,” and “tabernacle of the testimony,” even though they would be accurate.) And, in those 56 occurrences, God calls the Decalogue by 12 different names. Listed below, are the number of times He uses each name.

Old Testament:

14 = The tablets (Ex. 32:15, 32:16a,b, 32:19, 34:1b,c, 34:28; Deut. 9:17, 10:2a,b, 10:3, 10:4, 10:5; 2 Chr. 5:10)

13 = The tablets of stone (Ex. 24:12, 31:18, 34:1, 34:4a,b; Deut. 4:13, 5:22, 9:9, 9:10, 9:11, 10:1, 10:3; 1 Kg. 8:9)

10 = The testimony (Ex. 16:34, 25:16, 25:21, 27:21, 30:6, 30:36, 40:20; Lev. 16:13; Num 17:4, 17:10)

3 = The tablets of the testimony (Ex. 31:18, 32:15, 34:29)

3 = The tablets of the covenant (Deut. 9:9, 9:11, 9:15)

3 = The Ten Commandments (Ex. 34:28; Deut. 4:13; 10:4)

2 = The covenant (1 Kg. 8:21; 2 Chr. 6:11)

1 = The words of the covenant (Ex 34:28)

1 = His covenant (Deut. 4:13)

0 = The moral law

New Testament:

2 = The letter (2 Cor. 3:6a,b)

1 = Letters on stone (2 Cor. 3:7)

1 = Tablets of stone (2 Cor. 3:3)

1 = The handwriting of ordinances (Col. 2:14)

1 = The tablets of the covenant (Heb. 9:4)

0 = The Ten Commandments

0 = The moral law

So, when you hear the phrase “the Ten Commandments,” the first thought that should come to your mind is, “tablets (of stone”), not “moral law.” Remember, another thought that should come to your mind is “the covenant.”

Do you think of the Ten Commandments as “the tablets of stone,” and “the covenant” (Old Covenant made with Israel?) When talking about the Ten Commandments, if you have to rely on words uninspired by the Holy Spirit (like “moral law”) to explain your theology, then you probably have a different theology than the Holy Spirit.

Did you see how many times the phrase “Ten Commandments” appears in the New Testament? Zero! (Think about that.)

(Excerpted from the book: “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”
24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Cancelled And All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience, Greg Gibson, p. 23-24)

New Covenant Theology Book Ready

September 29th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

Did you enjoy reading the 3, free chapters last week from my new book “ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”? If so, that was only the tip of the iceberg. The book includes 25 more chapters to help you make sense of God’s law in redemptive history.

And, if you’ve been waiting to read the rest of the story, the printer says we are finally ready to ship. So, you can place your order now, here: New Covenant Theology Book

Greg Gibson
JesusSaidFollowMe.org

New Covenant Theology Book Excerpts

September 19th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

How would you like to read 3, free chapters from my new book:

“ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”
24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Cancelled
And All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience

(BTW, I’ve edited and expanded this book from the previous e-book by adding 7 new charts and 8349 more words. Now, it’s far clearer than before.)

Here is the book’s Table of Contents:

And, here are the 3, free chapters…

Preface and Introduction (with 1 chart and 3 diagrams)

But the Ten Commandments Are the Moral Law of God

But Christ Did Not Come to Abolish the Law

Please don’t order the book yet, since we are waiting for the printer’s approval. When the book is ready for shipping next week, I’ll announce it here…

P.S. Notice to Email Subscribers:

In order to continue receiving future updates about new Bible studies, blogs, and book excerpts, you must resubscribe to our new email service Feedburner (owned by Google).

To resubscribe, please…
1. Click on JesusSaidFollowMe.org
2. Look in the upper left corner of the page for JesusSaidFollowMe News.
3. Type your email address.
4. Click “Send Me News.”

If you don’t resubscribe, then you will not receive any more emails when I post new, book excerpts here.

See you next week…

Best Blogs Digest

August 21st, 2008

By Greg Gibson

Here’s a digest of some favorite resources I’ve discovered recently around the Web…

Does Your Calvinism Build Relationships With Arminians?
“…Theologically, I am Reformed. Sociologically, I am simply a Christian…when our theological distinctives make us aloof from other Christians…Even if a biblical argument can be made for a certain position…the proof of what’s really happening is not in the theological argumentation but in the sociological integration…(Paul) was a free man setting others free…What unifies the church is the gospel…My reformed friend, can you move among other Christian groups and really enjoy them?…Relationships reveal what we really believe, as opposed to what we think we believe.” Truly Reformed by Ray Ortlund at Christ Is Deeper Still

Several, Helpful Articles on God’s Law
God’s Law by Doug Moo

Starved for Mature Meat
“A prominent radio preacher frequently makes the statement that 85% of the people never darken a church door. Just could be that they’ve been starved out.

Tell me now, how long is it since you preached a sermon on the Sovereignty of God, the Majesty of God, the Holiness of God, the Justice of God, the Immutability of God, and the eternal, electing Love of God? Most of the preaching of our day in evangelical, as well as in liberal churches, is man-centered, not God-centered. Christian people have been entertained and whipped and broken and crucified and psychoanalyzed and sensitivity-trainingized, etc., etc., until they hardly know who God is or who they are…” Hey Preacher by G.E. MacLean at Banner of Truth

Joel Osteen’s Negative Message
“…The ‘positive’ message he proclaims is this: Do better. Try harder. Believe you can succeed. In other words, you can change! Just do it! God will help you, of course, but you have to make it happen.

Though Osteen claims he has positive sermons, I believe he is proclaiming the most negative, unmerciful message possible! Like telling a clinically depressed person to “just snap out of it!,” Osteen is giving people burdened by sin, guilt and despair more reason to despair.

Do we really think that more willpower will solve our problems? What is this message but the Law on steroids? There is no gospel in Osteen’s message, regardless of his rare references to Jesus Christ. Osteen’s idea of “good news” is telling self-centered people to look for salvation in more narcissism!…” Joel Osteen’s Negative Message by Trevin Wax at Kingdom People

Follow Me
“…Yet, Jesus didn’t say, “Follow them”; he said quite clearly, “Follow me.” The true disciple puts his loyalty, not with a group or another human or a new idea, however good those things may be, but only with his master who has called him by name…” Following Christ by Trevin Wax at Kingdom People

Inventing Mental Illness
Interviews with several psychiatrists where they concede too much. Diagnostic Statistical Manual (DSM): Inventing Mental Illness by the Citizen’s Commission on Human Rights (A Scientology group, beware!)

One Man Committed to Christ
“…(William) Borden’s small morning prayer group gave birth to a movement that spread across the campus. By the end of his first year, 150 freshman were meeting for weekly Bible study and prayer. By the time Bill Borden was a senior, one thousand of Yale’s 1,300 students were meeting in such groups. Borden made it his habit to seek out the most “incorrigible” students and try to bring them to salvation…” No Reserves. No Retreats. No Regrets by Brian Hedges at Light and Heat

8 Dangers of Exclusive, Redemptive-Historical Preaching
I lo-o-ove redemptive-historical preaching. But, like all styles of preaching, it has its strengths and weaknesses. Ethics, Preaching, and Biblical Theology by John Frame

Minimizing the Bible?
Have seeker-sensitive preachers and over-contextualizing missionaries lost faith in the power of God’s Word to change people? Preach the whole counsel of God!

“…It seems to me that a growing number of pastors and missionaries have lost confidence in this truth. They have concluded that the gap between the glory of Christ and the felt needs of their neighbors, or between the glory of Christ and the religion of the nationals, is simply too great for the fullness of God’s word to overcome. The upshot seems to be the minimization of the Word of God in its robust and glorious fullness.

This is on my front burner just now because in recent weeks I have received a steady stream of testimonies from aching saints who say in so many words, “Our pastor doesn’t proclaim to us what the Bible says and means. The messages are not revelations of the glory of Christ. They are advice-talks with a religious twist…” Minimizing the Bible by John Piper

The Guilt of Giving Part of God’s Counsel
Preach the whole Bible, nothing less! The Guilt of Giving Part of God’s Counsel by John Piper

Seminary Training vs. Church Training?
Who can better train future church pastors than current church pastors? Where better to learn to pastor a church than in a church? Long before pastors’ training became academicized and institutionalized, local churches trained pastors. Proposal for a New Seminary by John Frame

“Books for Pastors’ Training and Discipleship Training”

April 27th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

Here are some of my favorite books for training pastors and church leaders. Most of these books, I’ve at least skimmed. Many of them, I’ve read. And, the rest I plan to read soon.

Each book was chosen because of its doctrinal faithfulness, the author’s reputation, endorsements, reviews, and clear and simple communication style. Most of the books are by pastors or seminary professors from several denominations. Many of the books are the same ones used in top seminaries in the U.S.

At the end of this list, you’ll also see links to 6 other lists…

1. Bible Study Tools

The Strongest NIV Exhaustive Concordance , Edward Goodrick and John Kohlenberger, MA

Vine’s Complete Expository Dictionary of Old and New Testament Words, W.E. Vine

New Bible Commentary: 21st Century Edition , Editors Don Carson, PhD, R.T. France, PhD, J.A. Motyer, D.D., and Gordan Wenham, PhD

New Dictionary of Biblical Theology, Editors: Don Carson, PhD, Graeme Goldsworthy, PhD, Brian Rosner, PhD, T. Desmond Alexander, PhD

2. Hermeneutics: How to interpret the Bible.

How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth, Gordon Fee, PhD, Prof. Regent College, Douglas Stuart, Prof. Gordon-Conwell Seminary

3. Preaching: How to preach. Man-centered vs. Christ-centered. Topical vs. expository. How to motivate disciples to holiness.

Biblical Preaching, Haddon Robinson, PhD, Prof. Gordon-Conwell Seminary

Christ-Centered Preaching, Bryan Chappel, PhD, Pres. Covenant Theol. Seminary

4. Biblical Theology: Understanding the outline & story plot of the whole Bible from Gen.–Rev.

God’s Big Picture: Tracing the Storyline of the Bible, Vaughn Roberts, Rector

The Symphony of Scripture, Mark Strom, Th.M.

5. Apologetics: Defending the faith. How to discern truth from error.

The Case for Christ, Lee Strobel, Author, Former pastor

Witnessing to the Cults: A Practical Study Course for Christian Workers, Alex Wilson and Christine Tetley

Far from Rome, Near to God: Testimonies of Fifty Converted Roman Catholic Priests, Richard Bennett, Former R.C. priest, Author

Health and Wealth: Material Blessings and Suffering in the Christian Life, Christopher Pope, (free article)

6. Systematic Theology: What does the whole Bible say about doctrinal topics?

Systematic Theology, Wayne Grudem, PhD, Prof. Phoenix Seminary

The Cross of Christ, John Stott, Ret. pastor

The Sovereignty of God in Providence, by John Reisinger, Ret. evangelist and pastor

The Five Points of Calvinism: Defined, Defended, Documented, David Steele, Former pastor, Curtis Thomas, Ret. pastor, Lance Quinn, Drs., Pastor

Are Miraculous Gifts for Today, (4 Views) Wayne Grudem, PhD, Prof. Phoenix Sem.

ALL Old Testament Laws Canceled: 24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Canceled and All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience, Greg Gibson, Author

Heaven, Randy Alcorn, Former Pastor and Seminary Prof.

The End Times Made Simple: How Could Everybody Be So Wrong About Biblical Prophecy, Sam Waldron, PhD, Prof. Midwest Center for Theol. Studies

7. Biblical Book Studies

Encountering the Book of Romans, Doug Moo, PhD, Prof. Wheaton Graduate School

8. Prayer: How to pray effectually

Fresh Wind, Fresh Fire, Jim Cymbala, Pastor

The Complete Works of E. M. Bounds on Prayer: Experience the Wonders of God through Prayer, E.M. Bounds

9. Evangelism: How to evangelize. Man-centered vs. God-centered. Why most churches have 80+% apostasy rates, but some have 80+% perseverance rates.

Appendix: Catalogue of Gospel Declarations in Acts, LoveInTruth.com, Andrew Fountain, Pastor, Former-Principle Toronto Baptist Sem. (Free online)

Tell the Truth: The Whole Gospel to the Whole Person by Whole People, Will Metzger, Campus Minister, Intervarsity Christian Fellowship

10. Pastoral Theology: Practical issues

Biblical Eldership: An Urgent Call to Restore Biblical Church Leadership, Alexander Strauch

Money, Possessions, and Eternity, Randy Alcorn, Former-Pastor and Seminary Prof.

Strengthening Your Marriage, Wayne Mack, D. Min., Ret. Prof. Master’s Seminary

11. Church History: What can we learn from movements’ strengths and weaknesses?

Christian History in Plain Language, Bruce Shelley, PhD, Prof. Denver Theol. Sem.

Edited 6/29/09

“Our Identity Comes From the Gospel”

April 19th, 2008

By Greg Gibson

Brian Hedges at Light and Heat blog posted about Gospel-centered ministry and fellowship. I especially appreciated his 4th point…

(4) We (especially church leaders, but this applies to followers as well) must learn to build our identity around Christ and the gospel, not around secondary doctrines or issues.

What kind of Christian are you? A reformed-baptist-amil-cessationist-complementarian? Or, a saint, elect, servant, disciple, and child of God?

To the best of my knowledge, every Biblical name for God’s people includes ALL Christians, not just SOME Christians. Doctrinal distinctives define what we believe. But, the gospel defines who we are.

Our identity comes from the gospel: Jesus Christ Himself, crucified and raised. And, our bond of fellowship comes from the Spirit’s regeneration, not doctrinal distinctives. Once you understand this, you’ll find it much easier to fellowship with brothers who differ with you on doctrinal issues secondary to the gospel.

You can read the rest of Brian’s blog here: Thoughts on Keeping the Gospel Central

P.S. See more Bible studies, blogs, and books at JesusSaidFollowMe.org


Big Picture Preaching: 3 Advantages to Expository Preaching From Long Passages Instead of Short Passages

October 8th, 2007

By Greg Gibson

Imagine you’re sitting in the church at Rome in the 1st century. You hear a knock on the door. In walks a messenger with a scroll from the Apostle Paul. An elder opens the scroll and reads Rom. 1:1-4, then stops, and preaches for 45 minutes. Finally, he concludes by saying, “We’ll read and study the next few verses next week.”

What’s wrong with this picture? Can you really picture the early church preaching from short passages like that? I think the elders probably read and commented on the whole letter in one message. (In following weeks, they probably also reminded the church of specific passages.)

Here’s something to think about…How many sermons did Jesus take to preach the Sermon on the Mount? (Matt. 5-7). The Upper Room Discourse? (John 13-17). The Olivet Discourse? (Matt. 24-25). He preached those messages in only one sermon each. Then, why do most expository preachers today divide those single sermons into dozens of sermons?

This quote sums-up well the need for Big Picture Preaching…

    “Show How the Text Connects to the Rest of Scripture. One of the biggest problems with preaching today is that the individual texts are often divorced from the whole of Scripture. While we do not neglect the details (e.g., word studies, grammar, syntax, historical setting, individual texts), we must be sure to show how the Bible fits together. The Bible is a story with many books; thus, we must be careful to show how these books and stories all fit together. Richard Lints has listed some helpful steps for examining particular texts within the larger context of Scripture. I would also suggest preparing sermons on larger portions of Scripture, rather than one or two verses. How can we possibly see the big picture if we miss the forest for the trees? The Bible did not come to us in chapters or individual verses, but as whole books. For some reason many pastors think they are treating the text “in-depth” when they spend five years preaching through the book of Matthew or spending five weeks on two verses. I think we should get people to see the big picture by preaching larger portions of Scripture, which will also allow us to get to other books of the Bible during our ministry. I am not suggesting to ignore the details of the text, but simply understand that the Bible is a book of literature and should be read and taught as such (as a book or a whole).” (Chad Knudson, Developing a Biblical-Theological Sermon, The Road to Emmaus blog, 2007.)

Also, The New Dictionary of Biblical Theology warns of overly-detailed, word-by-word expository preaching…

    “Dangers to be avoided…Slow motion biblical theology. Sometimes a preacher preaches a complete sermon on every word of a text, including a complete biblical theology of each word drawn from all its occurrences in Scripture. To do this is to lose the movement and particularity of the text, so that it becomes a peg on which to hang a series of theological sermons. Each word is used as an exercise in biblical theology. William Gurnall’s The Christian in Complete Armour exemplifies this approach.” (P.J.H. Adam, ‘Preaching and Biblical Theology,’ in T. Desmond Alexander, Brian S. Rosner, D.A. Carson, Graeme Goldsworthy: editors, New Dictionary of Biblical Theology, Inter-Varsity Press, 2000.)

Expository preachers have different views of how much detail to include in their sermons…

4 Different Views of How Much Detail
To Include in Expository Preaching

1. Word-by-word
2. Verse-by-verse
3. Passage-by-passage
4. Theme-by-theme

The goal of this blog is to explain why the 4th style, theme-by-theme, expository preaching, should help disciples grow faster. This style may be described by any of the following 3 names…

    1. Big Picture Preaching
    2. Theme-by-Theme Expository Preaching
    3. Expository Preaching From Long Passages

Theme-by-theme, expository preaching should not be confused with most seeker-sensitive style, topical preaching today. Most topical preachers compromise and edit the so-called “negative” parts of God’s Word because they fear men, since they aren’t filled with the Holy Spirit’s boldness. And, they often misinterpret verses by extracting them from their contexts. However, theme-by-theme, expository preaching teaches the whole Bible from beginning to end, with these 5 goals…

5 Goals of Theme-by-Theme, Expository Preaching

1. Explain: What is the text’s context in relation to the whole passage, whole book, and whole Bible (redemptive-historical)?

2. Interpret: What is the meaning of the text?

3. Identify: What are the main theme(s) and sub-theme(s)?

4. Emphasize: Focus on the main theme(s) more than the minor details.

5. Apply: How should we then live?

God has not explicitly spoken about what length of passages we should preach. There are no right and wrong here, but there are better and best. Although I lack any “Thus saith the Lord,” I’m going to try using some common sense to persuade you to try “Big Picture Preaching.”

Before we see the advantages of this style of preaching, let’s answer 3 popular objections against preaching from long passages, instead of short passages…

3 Objections Against Preaching From Long Passages,
Instead of Short Passages

1. “But, verse-by-verse preaching is more in-depth and less shallow, and it contains more meat and less milk.”

Frankly, I find it far more in-depth to grasp God’s unifying, redemptive-historical themes from Genesis - Revelation, like creation - new creation, sin, covenants, salvation, kingdom, temple, rest, etc. And, the milk-meat distinction in Hebrews 5:12ff has nothing to do with explaining every verse. It refers to advancing from basic doctrinal truths like repentance, faith, baptism, etc. to mature truths like apostasy-perseverance.

2. “But, we need extra time to explain the historical-cultural context of the Bible.”

Granted, sometimes we need to reconstruct the historical-cultural context for our listeners. However, do we really need 34 sermons to reconstruct the 1st century, historical-cultural context of the Sermon on the Mount?

3. “But, some literary genres (like teaching passages in Romans) require more time to explain than others (like historical narratives in Joshua.)

True, but do we really need 5 years to explain Romans?

I’ve yet to see any good reason why most expository preachers prefer short passages, instead of long passages. OK, now here are 3 advantages to preaching from long passages, instead of short passages…

3 Advantages to Preaching From Long Passages,
Instead of Short Passages

1. Preaching Longer Passages Helps Disciples Understand More Truths Sooner

Has your church ever lost members who moved out of your area? If so, how many preaching series did they hear before leaving? Only one, a few?

Which disciples do you think will mature sooner? Those who hear…

A. One series for 5-years in Romans?
or
B. Twelve series in 5 years in John, Matthew, Acts, 1 John, Genesis, Hebrews, Romans, and 1 Thes.-2 Thes., and 1 Tim.-Titus?

Remember, Jesus invested 3+ years discipling His apostles. If He were on earth today, can you imagine Him discipling them with 3 years in Romans only? Of course not. He taught them numerous topics during that 3 years: What to believe, how to love God foremost, how to trust God, how to pray, how to evangelize, how to love people, how to talk with people, etc.

2. Preaching Longer Passages Motivates Hearers to Obey by Preserving the Doctrinal Context of the Commands

Most of the commands (imperatives) in the New Testament are given in the context of indicative, doctrinal truths. (Incidentally, that’s why “those who learn little doctrine, grow little.”)

It’s OK to discuss the commands alone for the purpose of defining a theological question in occasional topical preaching. (For instance, the topic, “Which commands must we obey?” is a valid question.) But, for long-term, weekly preaching, preach the commands in their doctrinal contexts.

For example, it’s easier to present our bodies as living sacrifices of worship (Rom. 12-16) when we first understand the gospel of salvation (Rom. 1-11). And, it’s not burdensome to walk worthy of our calling when “every spiritual blessing in Christ” is fresh in our minds (Eph. 1-3.). Also, when we see how we’re raised with Christ (Col. 2:10 - 3:1) we’re motivated to put off anger, rage, malice, slander, and filthy language (Col. 3:8. Burdensome preachers might divide Col. 3:8 into 5 separate sermons, one on each sin.)

3. Preaching Longer Passages Helps Hearers See the Big Picture by Emphasizing the Major Theme(s) Above the Minor Parts

I once read a pastor’s preaching schedule to preach through Romans in ~5 years. I thought to myself, “Talk about missing the forest for the trees!” Maybe that’s how he learned to preach in seminary. But, is that how Christ taught his apostles to preach?

Don Carson warns of preachers missing the forest for the trees (at least in the narratives of the 4 gospels,)

    “The best of Western seminaries and theological colleges reinforce the cultural bent toward the abstract, and fill students’ heads with the importance of grammatical, lexicographical exegesis. Such exegesis is, of course, of enormous importance. But in students who do not have a feel for literature, it can have the unwitting effect of so focusing on the tree, indeed on the third knot of the fourth branch from the bottom of the sixth tree from the left, that the entire forest remains unseen, except perhaps as a vague and ominous challenge. The antidote is to direct attention to the narrative…” (D.A. Carson, The Gospel According to John, Pillar New Testament Commentary, Eerdmans, 1991, pp. 100-101.)

Carson also advises preaching from longer texts (at least in the gospel of John,)

    “The second suggestion is to select a fairly large unit of text as the basis for each sermon. If a preacher takes six weeks to expound the Prologue (1:1-18), and is actually saying anything that has much content, almost inevitably a great deal of later material in John has been dragged in. Far better to deliver one’s soul on the Prologue in one sermon, complete ch. 1 the next week, and proceed at a good pace through the text so that while the slower preacher is polishing closing remarks on 1:51 you are already well into the farewell discourse.” (Carson, op. cit., p. 102)

Instead of spending 5 years in Romans, why can’t we learn the whole book in ~8 messages, something like this?…

    Week 1. Intro., Main Theme: The Gospel of Salvation,
    Sub-Theme: Righteousness by Faith (1:1-17)

    Week 2. Condemned: God’s Righteousness Needed by All Humans (1:18 - 3:20)

    Week 3. Justified: God Righteousness Credited by Faith in Christ (3:21 - 5:21)

    Week 4. Sanctified: God’s Righteousness Progressing in Us (6:1 - 8:15)

    Week 5. Glorified: God’s Righteousness Completed - Our Assurance (8:16-39)

    Week 6. Glorified: God’s Righteousness Completed - Israel’s Future and Christ’s Return (9:1 - 11:36)

    Week 7. God’s Righteousness Applied in the Church and World (12:1 - 15:13)

    Week 8. Conclusion (15:14 - 16:27)

I really enjoy seeing the “big picture.” There’s something awe-inspiring about understanding how each passage relates to the overview of the whole book and the whole Bible. I’d like to hear a preacher develop the theme of Romans as “the gospel of God’s saving righteousness” (Rom. 1:16-17) then relate it back to every passage in future weeks. It’s helpful to hear reviews every week to remind us of the book’s theme.

Divide the Sermon on the Mount Into 34 Sermons?

Here’s a typical, verse-by-verse, expository preaching outline for the Sermon on the Mount divided into 34 sermons…

Week  1. Intro., Main Theme: God’s Righteous Kingdom
Week  2. Spiritual Poverty (5:3)
Week  3. Mourning (5:4)
Week  4. Meekness (5:5)
Week  5. Hungering and Thirsting for Righteousness (5:6)
Week  6. Merciful (5:7)
Week  7. Purity in Heart (5:8)
Week  8. Peacemaking (5:9)
Week  9. Persecution (5:10-12)
Week 10. The Salt of the Earth, and Light of the World (5:13-16)
Week 11. The Law and Prophets Fulfilled, Not Destroyed (5:17-20)
Week 12. Murder and Anger (5:21-26)
Week 13: Adultery (5:27-30)
Week 14. Divorce (5:31-32)
Week 15. Oaths (5:33-37)
Week 16. Vengeance (5:38-42)
Week 17. Love your Enemies (5:43-48)
Week 18. Giving (6:1-4)
Week 19. Intro. to Prayer (6:5-8)
Week 20. Prayer: Our Father in Heaven (6:9)
Week 21. Prayer: Your Kingdom Come (6:10)
Week 22. Prayer: Give Us Our Daily Bread (6:11)
Week 23. Prayer: Forgive Us Our Debts (6:12, 14-15)
Week 24. Prayer: Do Not Lead Us Into Temptation (6:13)
Week 25. Fasting (6:16-18)
Week 26. Materialism: Your Treasure Follows Your Heart (6:19-21)
Week 27. Materialism: The Eye Is the Lamp of the Body (6:22-23)
Week 28. Materialism: You Cannot Serve God and Money (6:24)
Week 29. Materialism: Do Not Worry (6:25-34)
Week 30. Judging (7:1-6)
Week 31. Perseverance in Prayer (7:7-11)
Week 32. The Golden Rule (7:12)
Week 33. False Prophets (7:13-20)
Week 34. Obedience and Lordship (7:21-29)

Personally, I find that style of preaching rather burdensome and fragmented with it’s micro-focus on the details, instead of the major themes and sub-themes. Notice that by week 34, the main theme (God’s righteous kingdom) was long forgotten 33 weeks ago. Why must we change Christ’s 15-minute sermon into 26 hours of sermons?

Why can’t we communicate the whole message of the Sermon on the Mount in ~6 sermons, something like this?…

    Week 1. Intro., Main Theme: God’s Righteous Kingdom, and Character (5:1-16)

    Week 2. Scripture in God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    The Law and Prophets Fulfilled, Not Destroyed (5:17-48)

    Week 3. Sincere Religion in God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    Giving, Praying, and Fasting (6:1-18)

    Week 4. Material Things in God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    God Will Provide, So Don’t Worry (6:19-34)

    Week 5. Judging in God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    Judging, Praying, and the Golden Rule (7:1-12)

    Week 6. Entering God’s Righteous Kingdom:
    Beware of False Prophets (7:13-29)

(Or, if a preacher wanted to preach the whole Sermon on the Mount in only one message like Jesus did, I couldn’t fault him.)

One famous preacher who preached from longer passages was the radio preacher J. Vernon McGee. By the way, he had some of the best conversion testimonies I’ve ever heard. It sounded like the Lord was really using him to lead sinners to Christ.

Emphasize the Major Themes More Than the Minor Details

McGee preached through the whole Bible in 5 years, which may be too fast or slow for you. But in general, I think he had the right idea to major on the majors, and minor on the minors. Good preachers identify the text’s main theme, and focus on it more than the peripheral details.

I wonder, where did we get this idea to preach mostly from short passages? Could it be some extra baggage leftover from the Reformers or Puritans? (Perhaps a church historian can answer that question?)

Well, those are just some of my uninspired, personal preferences about preaching.

Why Not Try “Big Picture Preaching?”

Can I challenge you? Why not pray and ask the Lord if you should try “Big Picture Preaching,” theme-by-theme through one whole book? Then ask your audience afterward which style they prefer, preaching from short passages or long passages? What have you got to lose? (Also, please share your experience with me.)

See another study on preaching from JesusSaidFollowMe:

“5 Types of Sermons” A chart including verse-quoting, topical, expository, and redemptive-historical sermons.

“An Evangelistic, Funeral Sermon”

October 1st, 2007

By Greg Gibson

This is an evangelistic, funeral sermon, born out of the prayers of ~15 brothers, that I preached to this audience…

-Education: Most had a high-school education.
-Religious background: Mostly unbelievers incl. ~80% Roman Catholics (mostly non-devout,) various Protestants, Evangelicals, and cults.
-Spiritual condition: A large number of liars, thieves, idolaters, adulterers, alcoholics, swindlers, etc.

For many/most, this was the first time they ever heard the gospel of Jesus Christ.

—————————————————————-

Intro. How I knew the deceased. I’d like to tell you a story about…

“Death From Sin, But Eternal Life From Christ”

My friends and neighbors, why does there have to be death? Why funerals? Why can’t we live forever, instead of only 75 years avg.? Way back ~3400 years ago, Moses wrote in the Psalms: “The length of our life is 70 years or 80, if we have the strength…” (Ps. 90:10) Why can’t we live forever? Do you know the reason why?

In the beginning, God didn’t create Adam and Eve to die, but to live forever with Him in the Garden of Eden. They enjoyed perfect peace and happiness living with God. God spoke to them, they heard His voice, and they spoke to God.

Life with God was perfect. There was no death, no sickness, no pain, no tears. And, Adam and Eve had the perfect marriage, perfect love and peace, no fighting. Everyone was happy. God was happy, and Adam and Eve were happy.

But then, they lost their perfect life of peace and happiness. Do you know how they lost it? Sin!

God gave them only one command, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat of it you will surely die.” (Gen. 2:17) But, they disobeyed God and sin ruined their perfect lives.

How did sin ruin their lives? They died spiritually, they were separated from God when He sent them out of His presence in the garden. And, they started the process of dying physically. Their bodies grew old, their faces got wrinkles, their hair turned gray, they got tired, and then finally they died. And, God was unhappy, and people were unhappy.

The Apostle Paul tells us,

    “…Sin entered the world through one man, and death through sin, and in this way death came to all men, because all sinned” (Rom. 5:12)

And so, that’s why we have to die and have funerals today because Adam and Eve’s sin brought death to us all.

After their sin, people started getting sick: Cancer, heart disease, diabetes, etc. And, people started to murder: “Cain attacked his brother Abel and killed him.” (Gen. 4:8) And, husbands and wives started fighting and cheating.

But, God saw how sin separated us from Him. He saw our lying, stealing, unforgiveness, idolatry, sexual immorality, adultery, and drunkenness. So, He did something to remove sin and bring people back to Him.

He came down from heaven to earth to change sinners. Jesus was born of a virgin. He lived a perfect life, the only person who never sinned. And, He did many powerful miracles. He calmed the storm winds, walked on the water, cast out demons, made the deaf to hear, made the blind to see, and even raised the dead.

But, evil men murdered Jesus on the cross. Then, 3 days later, God raised Him from the dead, proving that He is the Son of God. After that, Jesus went up to heaven, and sat down on the throne of God, where He reigns as king over all things.

He is the one who has planned how many years you will live: 25, 50, or 75 years? He is the one who gives you food to eat, or holds it back. And, He is the one who forgives sins, or punishes.

My friends and neighbors, God did not send His Son, the Lord Jesus Christ here to suffer and die so that we could continue living in sin like hypocrites. No! He tells us in 1 Cor. 6…

    “Do you not know that evil people will not receive the kingdom of heaven? Do not be deceived…

Please don’t be deceived by liars who tell you that you can continue doing evil, and still go to heaven because you were baptized. The Lord says,

    “Neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor male prostitutes, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the greedy, nor alcoholics, nor liars, nor swindlers will receive the kingdom of heaven. And, that is what some of you were. But you were washed, you were set apart, you were judged not guilty in the name of the Lord Jesus Christ and by the Spirit of our God.”

Did you hear that? In the early church, there were ex-sexually immoral, ex-idolaters, ex-adulterers, ex-prostitutes, ex-gays, ex-thieves, ex-alcoholics, ex-liars, and ex-swindlers. God changed them by His power. It’s impossible to know the great and holy God without being changed by Him.

The good news is that no matter how many sins you’ve done, dozens of sins, hundreds of sins, Jesus Christ is ready to forgive you today. Jesus the True Priest, the only priest who never sinned, can wash away all those years of guilt and sin.

The apostle Paul says,

    “For the wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.” (Rom 6:23)

    “..since death came through a man, the resurrection of the dead comes also through a man. For as in Adam all die, so in Christ all will be made alive.” (1 Cor. 15:21)

    “For God so loved the world that He gave His one and only Son, that whoever believes in Him will not perish but have eternal life.” (John 3:16)

All who believe in Jesus Christ as Savior and Lord, God will give to them eternal life.

Remember when Adam and Eve enjoyed life with God in the Garden where there was no death, no sickness, no pain, and no crying? Well, God is going to recreate the Garden of Eden, and it’s going to come down from heaven to a new earth on the last day.

He tells us in the book of Revelation,

    “Then I saw a new heaven and a new earth, for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away, and there was no longer any sea. I saw the Holy City, the new Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God, prepared as a bride beautifully dressed for her husband.

    And I heard a loud voice from the throne saying, ‘Now the place God lives is with men, and He will live with them. They will be His people, and God Himself will be with them and be their God. He will wipe every tear from their eyes. There will be no more death, or sadness, or crying, or pain, for the old things have passed away.’ He who was seated on the throne said, ‘I am making everything new!’…

    He said to me: ‘It is done. I am the Beginning and the End. To him who is thirsty I will give to drink without cost from the spring of the water of life. He who overcomes will receive all this, and I will be his God and he will be My son. But the cowardly, the unbelieving the evil, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic, the idolaters, and all liars – their place will be in the lake of fire. This is the 2nd death.” (Rev. 21:1-8)

Also in Revelation, our Lord Jesus promises,

    “I am coming soon! My reward is with Me, and I will give to everyone according to what he has done…Blessed are those who have the right to enter into the city of heaven. Outside are the dogs, those who practice magic, the sexually immoral, the murderers, the idolaters, and everyone who loves and practices lies.” (Rev. 22:12-15)

May I please ask you a personal question? If you died tonight, do you know for sure that you will enter heaven? When you stand before God’s judgment throne, if He asks you, “Why should I let you into heaven,” what will you say?

If the first words that come out of your mouth are, “I did this, I did that, or I’m a good person” you’re lost. But, if the first words that come out of your mouth are, “Jesus Christ died to pay for my sins,” and your life proved your faith, then God will welcome you into the kingdom of heaven.

When the jailer asked the apostle Paul, “What must I do to be saved?” Paul didn’t say, “Get baptized, go to church, go to confession, try to be good, do this, and do that, etc.” No, no, no! He said, “Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved.”

Sin brought death into the world. But, Jesus Christ brought eternal life. Trust Him now to change you.

P.S. See more Bible studies, blogs, and books at JesusSaidFollowMe.org


“12 Questions to Ask to Find a Church”

September 19th, 2007

By Greg Gibson

Perhaps the most important decision you’ll make affecting your sanctification is which church to join. How much you mature in Christ will probably be influenced more by your choice of a church than even a spouse.

I’ll never forget ~20 years ago, a pastor asked me, “Where do you attend church?” After I answered, he asked me, “Is it reformed?”

Later, another pastor asked me, “Where do you attend church?” After I answered, he asked me, “Is God saving sinners there?”

Notice the contrast between the 2 pastors’ marks of a good church.

I wish God gave us a simple list of questions, marks, or a confession of faith to distinguish mature churches from immature ones. But, both personal and corporate (church) sanctification are too complex for reductionistic, simplistic signs. A church may have all the right doctrine and signs, yet the leaders’ hearts are hardened by sin. How do you measure things like heart, and brotherly love?

With those limitations in mind, here are 12 questions designed to help you find a church body where you will grow in Christ…

1. In the past 3 years, how many conversions have you seen here, and are they temporary or permanent?

True and lasting conversions are a strong sign of God’s approval. He often leads His elect to churches where He is pleased to draw them to Himself through the clear gospel preaching, and lives of the members. This question will screen-out those who assume decisions = conversions. And, it will reveal their views of evangelism, regeneration, and salvation.

2. What is your rate of baptisms to perseverance/apostasy?

This is a follow-up to question #1. Do they have a 90% apostasy rate like many churches today, or a 90+% perseverance rate like the apostles in the New Testament? A high apostasy rate is usually a sign that their evangelistic message and methods are different from the apostles.

3. How many members do you have, and how many of them attend weekly meetings?

Do they tolerate sin or keep the body pure by practicing church discipline?

4. What % of your members show signs of regeneration?

Are they more interested in numbers or regeneration?

5. How much of the Bible do you teach: All of it, or part of it?

Is the teaching selective, or do they teach the whole Bible like Christ and the apostles?

6. In your preaching, do you merely quote Bible verses, or explain their context, interpretation, and application?

Do they preach expositionally, topically, or do they merely quote verses out of context?

7. What is the Bible’s main message?

The gospel about Jesus Christ. How balanced is the teaching? Do they have a hobbyhorse topic they repeat every week? Is the pastor unable to preach for 45 minutes without returning to his favorite words every week: Election, rapture, prosperity, etc.?

8. What is your summary of the Gospel?

Jesus Christ the Son of God came to earth, did many miracles, died, rose, reigns, and will return. Repent of your sin and believe in Him.

9. Who are your favorite authors and preachers?

Bad company corrupts good character, and good company influences good character.

10. What is your favorite denomination, group, or movement?

Independent, non-denominational churches are often less-restrained to change their doctrine and grow. But, there are many good men in some denominations or movements. It all depends on the leaders’ hearts.

11. How much of your favorite authors, preachers, and groups do you agree with: Part or all of them?

Are they following men or Christ?

12. Do you ever pray and ask the Lord to correct you if you’re wrong about any doctrinal views?

How humble and teachable are they?

Below are some church lists that may help you find a church. If you can’t find a church in your area, start praying that God will build a church there. Perhaps He will transform an existing church, or maybe even use you to plant a new church.

9 Marks
Bible Bulletin Board
Fire Fellowship
Sound of Grace
Sovereign Grace Ministries

P.S. See more Bible studies, blogs, and books at JesusSaidFollowMe.org


“The Free Gift”

September 19th, 2007

How Canada’s Most Famous, Former-Roman Catholic Priest
Finally Found Peace and Joy

By Charles Chiniquy

I was born and baptized a Roman Catholic in 1809, and I was ordained priest in the year 1833, in Canada.

For 25 years I was a priest of that Church. And, I tell you frankly that I loved the Church of Rome, and she loved me. I would have shed every drop of my blood for my Church and would have given a thousand times my life to extend her power and dignity over the continent of America, and over the whole world.

My great ambition was to convert the Protestants, and bring them into my Church, because I was told, and I preached, that outside the Church of Rome there was no salvation, and I was sorry to think that those multitudes of Protestants were to be lost.

A few years after I was born we lived in a place where there were no schools. My mother became my first teacher, and the first book in which she taught me to read was the Bible. When I was 8 or 9 years old, I read the Divine Book with an incredible pleasure, and my heart was much taken up with the beauty of the Word of God.

My mother selected the chapters she wished me to read. And the attention I gave to it was such that, many times, I refused to go and play with the little boys outside in order to enjoy the reading of the Holy Book. Some of the chapters I loved more than others, and these I learned by heart.

The Priest Tried to Take Away Our Bible

But, after my mother died, the Bible disappeared from the house, probably through the priest who had tried to obtain possession of it before. Now this Bible is the root of everything in this story.

That is the light which was put into my soul when young, and thanks be to God, that light has never been extinguished. It has remained there. It is to that dear Bible, by the mercy of God, that I owe today the unspeakable joy which I feel at being the redeemed, among those who have received the light, and are drinking at the pure fountain of truth.

But perhaps you are inclined to say: “Do not the Roman Catholic priests allow their people to read the Bible? Yes, I thank God that it is so. It is a fact that today, almost all over the world, the Church of Rome grants permission to read the Bible. And you will find the Bible in the homes of some Roman Catholics.

But, when we have confessed this we must tell the whole truth. When the priest puts the Bible in the hands of his people, or when a priest receives the Bible from his church, there is a condition.

Allowed to Read the Bible, But Not Think for Yourself About it

The condition is that though the priest or people may read the Bible, they must never, under any circumstances, interpret a single word according to their conscience, their intelligence, or in their own mind. When I was ordained a priest I swore that I would interpret the Scriptures only according to the unanimous consent of the Holy Fathers.

Friends, go to Roman Catholics today, and ask them if they have permission to read the Bible. They will tell you, “Yes, I can read it.” But ask, “Have you permission to interpret it?” They will tell you, “No.”

The priest says positively to the people, and the Church says positively to the priest, that they cannot interpret a single word of the Bible according to their own intelligence and their own conscience, and that it is a grievous sin to take upon themselves the interpretation of a single word.

The priest says in effect to the people: “If you try to interpret the Bible with your own intelligence you are lost. It is a most dangerous book. You may read it, but it is better not to read it, because you cannot understand it.”

Only 2 of 10,000 Priests Have Read the Whole Bible

What is the result of such teaching? The result is that though both the priests and the people have the Bible in their hands, they do not read it. Would you read a book if you were persuaded that you cannot understand a single word by yourself? Would you be such fools as to waste your time reading a book which you were persuaded you could not understand a single line of?

Then, my friends, this is the truth about the Church of Rome. They have a great number of Bibles. You will find Bibles on the tables of the priests and of Catholic laymen. But, among 10,000 priests, there are not 2 who read the Bible from the beginning to the end and pay attention to it. They read a few pages here and there; that is all.

In the Church of Rome the Bible is a sealed book, but it was not so with me. I found it precious to my heart when I was a little boy, and when I became a priest of Rome I read it to make me a strong man, and to make me able to argue for the Church.

My great object was to confound the Protestant ministers of America. I got a copy of the Holy Fathers, and I studied it day and night with the Holy Scriptures, in order to prepare myself for the great battle I wanted to fight against the Protestants. I made this study in order to strengthen my faith in the Roman Catholic Church.

But, blessed be God! Every time I read the Bible there was a mysterious voice saying to me, “Do you not see that in the Church of Rome you do not follow the teachings of the Word of God, but only the traditions of men?”

In the silent hours of the night, when I heard that voice, I wept and cried, but it was repeated with the strength of thunder. I wanted to live and die in the Holy Roman Catholic Church, and I prayed to God to silence the voice, but I heard it yet still louder. When I was reading His Word He was trying to break my chains, but I would not have any chains broken. He came to me with His saving light, but I would not have it.

I Was Miserable While a Priest

I have no bad feeling against Roman Catholic priests. Some of you may think I have. You are mistaken. Sometimes I weep for them because I know that the poor men - just as I did - are fighting against the Lord, and that they are miserable as I was miserable then. If I relate to you one of the struggles of which I speak, you will understand what it is to be a Roman Catholic priest and you will pray for them.

In Montreal there is a splendid cathedral capable of holding 15,000 people. I used to preach there very often. One day the Bishop asked me to speak on the Virgin Mary, and I was glad to do so. I said to those people what I thought to be true then, and what the priests believe and preach everywhere. Here is the sermon I preached…

My dear friends, when a man has rebelled against his king, when he has committed a great crime against his emperor, does he come himself to speak to him? If he has a favor to ask from his king, dare he, under the circumstances, appear himself in his presence? No; the king would rebuke him.

Then, what does he do? Instead of going himself he selects one of the friends of the king, sometimes one of his officers, sometimes the sister or the mother of the king, and he puts his petition into their hands. They go and speak in favor of the guilty man. They ask his pardon, they appease his wrath, and very often the king will grant to these people the favor which he would refuse to the guilty man.”

“Then,” I said, “we are all sinners, we have all offended the great and mighty King, the King of Kings. We have raised rebellious colors against Him. We have trampled His laws under our feet, and surely He is angry against us. What can we do today? Shall we go ourselves with our hands filled with our iniquities? No!

But, thanks to God, we have Mary the mother of Jesus our King, at His right hand. And as a dutiful son never refuses any favor to a beloved mother, so Jesus will never refuse any favor to Mary. He has never refused any petition which she presented to Him when He was on earth. He has never rebuked His mother in any way. Where is the son who would break the heart of a mother, when he could rejoice her by granting her what she wants.

Then I say, Jesus the King of Kings, is not only the Son of God, but He is the Son of Mary, and loves His mother. And as He has never refused any favor of Mary when He was on earth, He will never refuse her any favor today. Then, what must we do?

Oh! We cannot present ourselves before the great King, covered as we are with iniquity. Let us present our petitions to His holy mother. She will go to the feet of Jesus, herself, Jesus, her God and her son. And she will surely receive the favors which she will ask. She will ask our pardon and will obtain it. She will ask a place in the Kingdom of Christ, and you will have it. She will ask from Jesus to forget your iniquities, to grant you the true repentance, and He will give you anything His mother may ask of Him.”

My hearers were so happy at the idea of having such an advocate at the feet of Jesus interceding for them day and night, that they burst into tears, and were beside themselves with joy that Mary was to ask and obtain their pardon.

I thought at the time that this was not only the religion of Christ, but that it was the religion of common sense, and that nothing could be said against it. After the sermon the Bishop came to me and blessed me, and thanked me, saying that the sermon would do great good in Montreal.

That night I went on my knees, and took my Bible. And my heart was full of joy because of the good sermon I had given in the morning. I opened and read from Matthew 12:46 the following words…

Jesus Refused His Mother Mary’s Request

“While He yet talked to the people, behold, His mother and His brethren stood without, desiring to speak with Him. Then said one unto Him…

‘Behold your mother and your brothers stand without desiring to speak with You.’ But He answered and said to him that told Him, ‘Who is My mother, and who are My brothers?’ And he stretched forth His hand toward His disciples and said: ‘Behold! My mother and My brothers, for whosoever shall do the will of My Father which is in Heaven, the same is My brother, and sister, and mother.’”

When I had read these words there was a voice speaking to me more terrible than the voice of loud thunder, saying…

“Chiniquy, you preached a lie this morning when you said that Mary had always received the favors which she had asked from Jesus. Do you not see that Mary comes to ask a favor, that is, to see her son, during whose absence she has been lonesome, and who has left her during many months to preach the Gospel?”

When Mary got to the place where Jesus was preaching the place was so crammed that she could not enter. What will she do? She will do what every mother would do in her place. She raises her voice and requests Him to come and see her. But while Jesus hears the voice of His mother, and with His divine eyes sees her, does He grant her petitions?

No. He shuts His ears to her voice and hardens His heart against her prayer. It is a public rebuke, and she feels it keenly.

The people are astonished. They are puzzled, almost scandalized. They turn to Christ, and they say to Him, “Why don’t you come and speak to your mother?” What does Jesus say? He gives no answer except this extraordinary one…

“Who is My mother, and who are My, brothers?” And, looking upon His disciples, He says, “Behold, My mother, My brothers, and My sisters.” As for Mary, she is left alone, and publicly rebuked.

And then the voice spoke to me again with the power of thunder, telling me to read again in St. Mark 3:31-35. You will find the same incident both in Mark and in Luke 8:19-21. Instead of granting her petition Jesus replied in such a way as to publicly rebuke His mother.

And then the voice spoke to me with terrific power, telling me that Jesus, so long as He was a little boy, obeyed Joseph and His mother. But as soon as Jesus presented Himself before the world as the Son of God, as the Savior of the world, as the great Light of humanity, then Mary had to disappear. It is to Jesus alone that the eyes of the world must be turned to receive Light and Life.

I Preached a Lie Against the Scriptures

Then, my friends, the voice spoke to me all the night, “Chiniquy, Chiniquy, you have told a lie this morning. And you were preaching a lot of fables and nonsense. And you preach against the Scriptures when you say that Mary has the power to grant any favor from Jesus.” I prayed and I wept, and it was a sleepless night with me.

The next morning I went to table with the Bishop Prince, the coadjutor, who had invited me to breakfast.

He said to me: “M. Chiniquy, you look like a man who has spent the night in tears. What is the matter with you?”

I said, “My lord, you are correct. I am desolate above measure?”

“What is the matter?” he asked.

“Oh! I cannot tell you here,” I said. “Will you please give me one hour in your room alone? I will tell you a mystery which will puzzle you.”

After breakfast I went out with him and said…

“Yesterday you paid me a great compliment because of the sermon in which I proved that Jesus had always granted the petitions of His mother. But, my lord, last night I heard another voice, stronger than yours, and my trouble is that I believe that voice is the voice of God.

That voice has told me that we Roman Catholic priests and bishops preach a falsehood every time we say to the people that Mary has always the power to receive from the hands of Jesus Christ the favors which she asks. This is a lie, my lord — this, I fear, is a diabolical and damning error.”

The Bishop then said: “M. Chiniquy, what do you mean? Are you a Protestant?” “No,” I said, “I’m not a Protestant.” (Many times I’d been called a Protestant because I was so fond of the Bible).

“But I tell you face to face, that I sincerely fear that yesterday I preached a lie, and that you, my lord, will preach one also the next time you say that we must invoke Mary, under the pretext that Jesus has never refused any favor to His mother. This is false.”

The Bishop said: “M. Chiniquy, you go too far!”

“No, my lord,” I said, “it is of no use to talk. Here is the Gospel. Read it.”

I put the Gospel into the hands of the Bishop, and he read with his own eyes what I have already quoted. My impression was that he read those words for the first time. The poor man was so much surprised that he remained mute and trembling. Finally he asked: “What does this mean?”

“Well,” I said, “this is the Gospel. And here you see that Mary has come to ask from Jesus Christ a favor. And He has not only rebuked her, but has refused to consider her as His mother. He did this publicly, that we might know that Mary is the mother of Jesus as man, and not as God,”

The Bishop Was Speechless

The Bishop was beside himself. He could not answer me.

I then asked to be allowed to put to him a few questions. I said: “My lord, who has saved you and saved me upon the Cross?”

He answered: “Jesus Christ.”

“Now, who paid your debts and mine by shedding his blood, Mary or Jesus?”

He said: “Jesus Christ.”

“Now, my lord, when Jesus and Mary were on earth, who loved the sinner more, Mary or Jesus?”

Again he answered that it was Jesus.

“Did any sinner come to Mary on earth to be saved?”

“No.”

“Do you remember that any sinner has gone to Jesus to be saved?”

“Yes, many.”

“Have they been rebuked?”

“Never.”

“Do you remember that Jesus ever said to sinners, ‘Come to Mary and she will save you?’”

“No,” he said.

“Do you remember that Jesus has said to poor sinners, ‘Come unto Me?’”

“Yes, He has said it.”

“Has he ever retracted those words?”

“No!”

“And who was, then, the more powerful to save sinners?” I asked.

“Oh! It was Jesus.”

“Now my lord, since Jesus and Mary are now in Heaven, can you show me in the Scriptures that Jesus has lost anything of his desire and power to save sinners, or that He has delegated this power to Mary?”

And the Bishop answered, “No.”

Why Not Come to Jesus Alone Since He Is Better than Mary?

“Then, my lord,” I asked, “why do we not go to Him, and Him alone? Why do we invite poor sinners to come to Mary, when by your own confession she is nothing compared with Jesus, in power, in mercy, in love, and in compassion for the sinner?”

Then the poor Bishop was as a man who is condemned to death. He trembled before me, and as he could not answer me, he pleaded business and left me. His “business” was that he could not answer me.

But I was still not converted. There were many links by which I was still tied to the feet of the Pope. There were other battles to be fought before I could break the chains which bound me.

But in those days, though I was troubled I had not lost my zeal for my Church. The Bishops had given me great power and authority, and the Pope had raised me above many others, and I had the hope, with many others, that little by little, we might reform the Church in many things.

In 1851 I went to Illinois to found a French colony. I took with me about 75,000 French Canadians, and settled on the magnificent prairies of Illinois, to take possession in the name of the Church of Rome.

The Bishop Was Angry That I Gave Bibles

After I had begun my great work of colonization I became a rich man. I bought many Bibles and gave one to almost every family. The Bishop was very angry at me for this, but I did not care. I had no idea of giving up the Church of Rome, but I wanted to guide my people as well as I could in the way in which Christ wanted me to lead them.

Now the Bishop of Chicago did a thing at that time which we Frenchmen could not tolerate. It was a great crime, and I wrote to the Pope and got him dismissed. Another Bishop was sent in his place, who sent his Grand Vicar to visit me.

The Grand Vicar said to me: “M. Chiniquy, we are very glad that you have got the former Bishop dismissed, for he was a bad man. But, it is suspected in many places that you are no more in the Church of Rome. It is suspected that you are a heretic and a Protestant. Will you not give us a document by which we can prove to all the world that you and your people are still good Roman Catholics?”

I said, “I have no objection.”

He replied, “It is the desire of the new Bishop whom the Pope has sent, to have such a document from you.”

Following the Traditions of Men, or the Word of God?

I then took a piece of paper — and it seemed to me that this was a golden opportunity to silence the voice which was speaking to me day and night and troubling my faith. I wanted to persuade myself by this means that in the Roman Catholic Church we were really following the Word of God, and not merely “traditions of men.” I wrote down these very words:

“My lord, we French Canadians of the colony of Illinois want to live in the Holy Catholic Apostolic and Roman Church, out of which there is no salvation, and to prove this to your lordship we promise to obey your authority according to the Word of God, as we find it in the Gospel of Christ.”

I signed that and offered it to my people to sign, and they did. I then gave it to the Grand Vicar, and asked him what he thought of it. He said, “It is just what we want.” He assured me that the Bishop would accept it, and all would be right.

When the Bishop had read the submission, he too found it right, and with tears of joy said, “I am so glad that you have made your submission, because we were in fear that you and your people would turn Protestants.”

Peace With Man, or God?

My friends, to show you my blindness, I must confess to my shame, that I was glad to have made my peace with the Bishop, a man, when I was not yet at peace with God. The Bishop gave me a letter of peace, by which he declared that I was one of his best priests.

And, I went back to my countrymen with the determination to remain there. But God looked down upon me in His mercy, and He was to break that peace which was peace with man and not with God.

Submit to the Bishop, or the Bible?

The Bishop, after my departure, went to the telegraph office and telegraphed my submission to the other bishops, and asked them what they thought of it. They unanimously answered him the very same day…

“Do you not see that Chiniquy is a disguised Protestant? And he has made a Protestant of you? It is not to you that he makes submission, he makes his submission to the Word of God. If you do not destroy that submission you are a Protestant yourself.”

The Bishop Burned My Letter of Peace

Ten days later I received a letter from the Bishop, and when I went to him he asked me if I had the “letter of peace” he had given me the other day. I produced it, and when he saw it was the letter, he ran to his stove and threw it into the fire. I was astonished. I rushed to the fire to save my letter, but it was too late. It was destroyed.

Then I turned to the Bishop and I said, “How dare you, my lord, take from my hand a document which is my property, and destroy it without my consent?”

He replied, “M. Chiniquy, I am your superior, and I have no account to give you.”

“You are indeed, my lord, my superior, and I am nothing but a poor priest. But there is a great God who is as much above you as above me. And that God has granted me rights which I will never give up to please any man. In the presence of that God I protest against your iniquity.”

“Well, he said, “do you come here to give me a lecture?”

I replied, “No, my lord. But I want to know if you brought me here to insult me?”

“M. Chiniquy,” he said, “I brought you here because you gave me a document which you know very well was not an act of submission.”

Then I answered: “Tell me, what act of submission do you require of me?

The Bishop Demanded Total Submission

He said, “You must begin by taking away these few words ‘according to the Word of God, as we find it in the Gospel of Christ,’ and say simply that you promise to obey my authority without any condition; that you will promise to do whatever I tell you.”

Then I got to my feet, and I said, “My lord, what you require of me is not an act of submission, but an act of adoration. And I refuse it to you.”

“Then,” he said, “if you cannot give me that act of submission, you cannot any longer be a Roman Catholic priest.”

I raised my hands to God, and said, “May Almighty God be forever blessed,” and I took my hat and left the Bishop.

I went to the hotel where I had reserved a room, and locked the door behind me. I fell on my knees to examine what I‘d done in the presence of God.

Then I saw, for the first time clearly, that the Church of Rome could not be the Church of Christ. I had learned the terrible truth, not from the lips of the Protestants, not from her enemies, but from the lips of the Church of Rome herself.

I saw that I could not remain in it except by giving up the Word of God in a formal document. Then, I saw that I had done well to give up the Church of Rome. But oh, my friends, what a dark cloud came upon me! In my darkness I cried out: “My God, my God, why is it that my soul is surrounded with such a dark cloud?”

With tears I cried to God to show me the way, but for a time, no answer was granted. I had given up the Church of Rome. I had given up position, honor, my brothers and sisters, everything that was dear to me!

The Cost of Following Christ: Losing Friends

I saw that the Pope, the Bishops and the priests would attack me in the press, and the pulpit. I saw that they would take away my honor and my name - and perhaps my life. I saw that war to the death was begun between the Church of Rome and me.

And, I looked to see if any friends had been left to me to help me fight the battle. But, not a single friend remained. I saw that even my dearest friends were bound to curse me, and look upon me as an infamous traitor. I saw that my people would reject me, that my beloved country, where I had so many friends, would curse me, and that I had become an object of horror to the world.

Then I tried to remember if I had some friends among the Protestants. But, as I had spoken and written against them all my life, I had not a single friend there.

I saw that I was left alone to fight the battle. It was too much, and in that terrible hour if God had not worked a miracle, I should not have been able to bear it. It seemed impossible for me to go out from that room into the cold world, where I should not find a single hand to shake my hand, or a single smiling face to look upon me, but where I should see only those looking upon me as a traitor.

It seemed that God was far away, but He was very near. Suddenly the thought entered my mind, “You have your Gospel; read it, and you will find the light.” On my knees, and with trembling hand, I opened the book. Not I, but God opened it, for my eyes fell on I Cor. 7:23…

“Ye are bought with a price, be not ye the servants of men.”

With these words the light came to me, and for the first time I saw the great mystery of salvation, as much as man can see it. I said to myself…

“Jesus has bought me. I am saved! Jesus is my God! All the works of God are perfect! I am, then, perfectly saved - Jesus could not save me by half. I am saved in the blood of the Lamb. I am saved by the death of Jesus.”

And, these words were so sweet to me that I felt unspeakable joy, as if the fountains of life were open and floods of new light were flowing in upon my soul. I said to myself:

“I am not saved, as I thought, by going to Mary. I am not saved by purgatory, or by indulgences, confessions, or penances. I am saved by Jesus alone!” And all the false doctrines of Rome went away from my mind as falls a tower which is struck at the base.

I Felt More Joy and Peace Than the Angels

I then felt such a joy, such a peace, that the angels of God could not be more happy than I was. The blood of the Lamb was flowing on my poor guilty soul. With a loud cry of joy I said:

“Oh! Gift of God, I accept You!

Take my heart and keep it forever Yours. Gift of God, abide in me to make me pure and strong. Abide in me to be my way, my light, and my life. Grant that I may abide in You now and forever! But, dear Jesus, do not save me alone. Save my people. Grant me to show them the Gift also! Oh, that they may accept You and feel rich and happy as I am now.”

It was thus I found the Light and the great mystery of our salvation, which is so simple and so beautiful, so sublime and so grand. I had opened the hands of my soul and accepted the gift. I was rich in the gift. Salvation, my friends, is a gift. You have nothing to do but to accept it, love it, and love the Giver. I pressed the Gospel to my lips, and swore I would never preach anything but Jesus.

I arrived in the midst of my colony on a Sabbath morning. The whole people were exceedingly excited and ran towards me, and asked what news. When they were gathered in the church, I presented to them The Gift. I showed to them what God had presented to me. His Son Jesus as a gift - and, through Jesus, the pardon of my sins, and life eternal as a gift.

Then, not knowing whether they would receive the gift or not, I said to them…

“It is time for me to go away from you, my friends. I have left the Roman Catholic Church forever. I have taken the gift of Christ, but I respect you too much to impose myself on you. If you think it is better for you to follow the Pope than to follow Christ, and to invoke the name of Mary than the name of Jesus, in order to be saved, tell it to me by rising up.”

To my exceeding great surprise the whole multitude remained in their seats, filling the church with their sobs and tears. I thought some of them would tell me to go, but not one did so. And as I watched I saw a change come over them — a marvelous change which cannot be explained in natural ways — and I said to them, with a cry of joy…

“The mighty God who saved me yesterday can save you today. With me you will cross the Red Sea and go into the Promised Land. With me you will accept the great gift - you will be happy and rich in the gift.

Will You Follow the Pope or Christ,
And Pray Through Mary or Jesus?

I will put the question to you in another way. If you think it is better for you to follow Christ than the Pope, to invoke the name of Jesus alone than the name of Mary, that it is better to put your trust only in the blood of the Lamb shed on the Cross for your sins, than in the fabulous purgatory of Rome after your death to be saved; and if you think it is better for you to have me preach to you the pure Gospel of Christ, than to have a priest preach to you the doctrines of Rome, tell it to me by rising up - I am your man.”

25,000 Received the Precious Gift

And all, without a single exception, rose to their feet, and with tears, asked me to remain with them. The Gift, the great unspeakable Gift had, for the first time, come before their eyes in its beauty; they had found it precious; they had accepted it; and no words can tell you the joy of that multitude. Like myself, they felt rich and happy in the Gift.

The names of 1000 souls I believe, were written in the Book of Life that day. Some months later, we were 2000 converts. A year later we were about 4000! And now, we are nearly 25,000 who have washed their robes and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.

The news spread quickly all over America, and even in France and England - that Chiniquy, the best-known priest in Canada, had left the Church of Rome, at the head of a noble band of men. And wherever it was said, the name of Jesus was blessed, and I hope you will bless the merciful and adorable Savior today with me, when it is my privilege to have told you what He has done for my soul.

——

After Chiniquy left Rome for Christ, the Jesuits plotted to discredit his character. But his flock, who as eyewitnesses knew him best, followed him from Rome.

Minor edits were made for clarity (without changing the meaning) including the subheads, paragraph divisions, punctuation, and spelling by Greg Gibson, Editor, JesusSaidFollowMe.org

P.S. See more Bible studies, blogs, and books at JesusSaidFollowMe.org


“The ‘Who Are You Following?’ Quiz”

September 19th, 2007

By Greg Gibson

This simple quiz is designed to help you know how well you are following Jesus Christ as your Teacher. (He is also our Priest and King.)

I have a personal confession to reveal…For the first 10 years of my Christian life, I followed Christ + men/a movement/a system. I over- esteemed them as “godly men,” until they became idols in my heart, rivaling my devotion to Christ. (Although, I thank God that He taught me many truths from them.)

Even now, I don’t claim infallibility, only teachability. So, if some of our answers differ below, then maybe together we can “search the Scriptures to see what is true.”

Now, examine yourself to see who you are following…

1. What is the Bible’s main message?

    A. God loves you, make a decision for Christ & ask Him into your heart.

    B. The Holy Spirit.

    C. Holiness.

    D. The doctrines of grace (Calvinism.)

    E. The gospel of (sovereign) grace (which must include the doctrines of grace.)

    F. The doctrine of the atonement, and the doctrine of the resurrection (systematic theology.)

    G. The gospel about Jesus Christ Himself, especially that: He lived, died, rose, ascended, and will return. Repent from your sins and believe on Him.

2. Who is my brother, and what is the ground of Christian fellowship?

    A. A sinner’s prayer.

    B. The _______ Confession of Faith.

    C. Regeneration.

3. Who is the greatest, and what is the measure of Christian maturity?

    A. The most zealous.

    B. Correct theology alone.

    C. Heart + doctrine + obedience.

4. Who gets the credit for your decision for Christ?

    A. The evangelist.

    B. You.

    C. God.

5. Who glorifies God more?

    A. A Calvinist full of hypocrisy, pride, and lying.

    B. An Arminian who is humble, godly, and obedient.

6. Why does the Lord entrust the conversion of His elect to a higher % of non-Calvinist evangelists than Calvinist evangelists? (This sad concession comes from a Calvinist. Most Calvinists testify they were saved through Arminian ministries, before understanding Calvinism later. So, why is God saving millions of sinners right now through non-Calvinist evangelists in persecuted countries like China and Vietnam?)

    A. They’re probably not real converts.

    B. The evangelists’ hearts.

7. Which theological system is true?

    A. All of Covenant theology.

    B. All of Traditional or Progressive Dispensationalism.

    C. Part of both A. and B., plus more (New Covenant Theology.)

8. Which movement is true?

    A. Anabaptist

    B. Reformed

    C. Puritanism

    D. Reformed Baptist

    E. Sovereign Grace Baptist

    F. Pentecostalism/Charismatic

    G. Fundamentalism

    H. Evangelicalism

    I. Church Growth/Seeker-Sensitive/Purpose Driven

    J. There is no perfect movement - only a perfect Savior. A better question to ask is, “How much of each movement is true?” All movements consist of imperfect individuals. If we don’t believe in individual perfectionism, then we shouldn’t believe in corporate perfectionism, right?

    All movements are passing fads, and mixtures of truth and error. Let’s learn from their strengths, while being aware of their weaknesses. Christ and the apostles started only one movement in the first century, for all believers, for all time: The Church. Do you love His Church (all who are regenerate) like He does?

P.S. See more Bible studies, blogs, and books at JesusSaidFollowMe.org


“8 Signs of Immature, Carnal Christians”

September 19th, 2007

By Greg Gibson

How to Mature from Following Men to Following Christ

I have an embarrassing personal confession to make. For the first 10 years of my Christian life, I was an immature, carnal Christian…

“How,” you wonder? The truth is, I followed men. What I mean is that I couldn’t think for myself. You see, I gave my devotion and mind to men, a movement, and a system. Then, I unconsciously let them do my thinking for me.

Was it the Church of Rome, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, or the Mormons? No, believe it or not, it was a group of evangelicals who preached the gospel of Jesus Christ. (Our group had many mature believers, many divisive believers like myself, and a few hypocrites.)

But, they didn’t welcome questions to their confession of faith and systematic theology. And unfortunately, I submitted my thinking to them because I over-esteemed them as godly men.

In the Bible, God has given us many descriptions of spiritual infancy vs. spiritual maturity. One of the descriptions of spiritual babes, in 1 Cor. 1:10-3:23, is dividing the Body by using labels, following men, and forming sub-groups. (The Corinthians weren’t carnal in all areas of their lives. Paul said they were acting carnal only because of their divisive man-following.)

Good Bible teachers not only proclaim Biblical truth, they also aren’t afraid to teach others how to study the Bible for themselves. To keep individual disciples from straying into error, God has given His Spirit, His Bible, and His Church.

Remember, we never need to be afraid of truth. (If you’re feeling fear right now, why not listen to your conscience? God gave it to you as a warning signal.)


The 8 signs of immature, carnal Christians are:

1. Reliance on an extra-biblical standard of authority such as:

    * A leader (author, guru, pastor, or infallible pope.)

    * An experience (feeling or alleged revelation.)

    * A sectarian group, movement, or organization (denom.)

    * A tradition (selective, truncated view of church history.)

    * A document (book, confession of faith, or study-Bible footnotes.)

2. Fear and avoidance of:

    * Talking to certain Christians who may challenge you.

    * Preaching on certain Bible texts or topics.

    * Allowing certain questions to be asked.

    * Discussing certain biblical topics.

    * Reading certain theological articles or books.

3. Unquestioned, uncritical agreement and allegiance to a human leader.

4. Unteachable and unwilling to listen to others from an open Bible.

5. Inability to think for oneself and form conclusions independent from outside influences and patterns of thinking received from others.

6. Reading an disproportionate percentage of books by one author or publisher.

7. Leaders micromanaging the details of their disciples’ lives which are normally areas of Christian liberty.

8. Cloning personality traits that are normally areas of Christian liberty.

Those characteristics are quite different from the Bereans whom Paul commended as “fair minded…in that they received the word with all readiness, and searched the Scriptures daily to find out whether these things were so” (Acts 17:11).

Please understand, there is no perfect organization, movement, or group. All groups are made of imperfect individuals. And, since there is no individual perfection, then there is no corporate perfection. There is only one perfect God-Man. Point your faith to Him.

Ask yourself, “How much do I agree with my favorite group?” If you agree 100%, beware! This could be a sign you’re following men, instead of Christ. If you suspect that you may be blindly following human leaders, what should you do?

First of all, realize that the Holy Spirit is the only teacher you need to understand God…

    “But the anointing (Holy Spirit’s teaching: cf. Jn. 14:26; 1 Jn. 2:20) which you have received from Him abides in you, and you do not need that anyone teach you; but as the same anointing teaches you concerning all things, and is true, and is not a lie, and just as it has taught you, you will abide in Him.”

Second, realize that truth can set you free. Remember, never be afraid to pursue truth. The truth will liberate you. Jesus said,

    “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.” (Jn. 8:32).
    “I AM…the truth…No one comes to the Father except through Me.” (Jn. 14:6)

The Truth is a Person: Jesus Christ. Trust in Him to take you to God the Father. Then, follow Him wherever He leads, whatever the cost.

And finally, simply pray to God, through Jesus Christ, asking Him to show you if you have been following men or Christ. And, ask Him to correct any false doctrines you may believe. He is faithful, and He will do it.

Jesus didn’t say, “Follow Me(n)” or “Follow (men’s interpretation of) Me.” Jesus said, “Follow Me.”

P.S. See more Bible studies, blogs, and books at JesusSaidFollowMe.org


“Does New Covenant Theology Allow Beastiality and Incest?”

August 30th, 2007

By Greg Gibson

One of the hottest arguments against New Covenant Theology (NCT) in blogs/forums goes something like this:

    “Since the New Testament doesn’t explicitly state that beastiality and incest are sins, therefore New Covenant Theology can’t be true.” (Just try to follow the “logic” behind that one!)

(Covenant Theologians might hurl that kind of argument against the New Covenant Theology in “22 Reasons Why All Old Testament Commands Are Cancelled and We Must Obey All New Testament Commands.”)

However, the same type of argument could easily be made against the Old Testament. Where does the Old Testament explicitly state that the following are sins:

    1. Abortion?
    2. Po-rn?
    3. Pedophilia?
    4. Being a pimp?
    5. Oral s-e-x before marriage?
    6. Buying an idol?
    7. Trying to buy the power of the Holy Spirit? (Acts 8:20)
    8. Lovers of themselves? (2 Tim. 3:2)
    9. Lovers of money? (2 Tim. 3:2)
    10. Etc.

(If you want to reply with the above words, please use the hyphens to avoid the spam filter.)

And, if you put your mind to it, I’m sure you could think of many more examples of so-called “moral sins” that aren’t stated explicitly in the Old Testament.

Two Assumptions: Explicit and Exhaustive

The problem with the above objection is that it’s dependent on 2 unexamined assumptions:

    1. The Old Covenant contains an explicit and exhaustive revelation of “moral law” (I prefer the phrase “law of conscience.”)

    2. The New Testament must contain an explicit and exhaustive revelation of “moral law” for New Covenant Theology to be true.

However, I don’t believe that either the Old Testament or New Testament explicitly reveal ALL the laws of conscience. (If they did, the Bible would have to be a lot longer!) We know some things are wrong because “we know that we know” (conscience.)

Although the objections about beastiality and incest are irrelevant to NCT because of the 2 assumptions above, let’s discuss them anyway…

All Christians agree that humans have consciences convicting them of certain “sins.” But, God never defines those sins for us in Scripture. However, He does tell us in certain sin lists the standards by which He will judge men for heaven or hell.

I believe that the sin lists for all humans (including Gentiles) are the most likely definition of the “law of conscience” (Rom. 1:18-32; 1 Cor. 6:9-10; Gal. 5:19-21; Rev. 21:8, 22:15.) Notice that Lev. 18:23 (beastiality) and Lev. 18:9 (incest) are part of a list of the sins of the Gentiles (18:3, 24-30.)

Even though the whole law of Moses (including Lev. 18) was cancelled as Old Covenant (but not Old Testament,) the same sins in Lev. 18 may also be recorded in Gentiles’ consciences. So, if a heathen living in a rainforest commits incest, he violates the law of conscience, not Lev. 18:9.

Majoring on the Minors

Again, questions about beastiality, incest, etc. are peripheral to NCT because of the 2 assumptions above. Such questions major on the minors. They’re really rabbit trails diverting from the main issues:

1. Are Jer. 31:31-33; Matt. 5:17-18; Rom. 3:31; 2 Tim. 3:16-17 really proof texts for Covenant Theology against New Covenant Theology? (Or, are some of them actually proof texts for New Covenant Theology against Covenant Theology?)

2. Does the Bible teach one Covenant of Grace, or 2 major covenants (structured by one purpose of grace?)

3. How can the law of Moses be divided into 3 parts when it’s one indivisible whole (Gal. 3:10, 5:3; Jas.2:10?)

4. How can the whole Decalogue still be binding when God calls it “the covenant” (which was cancelled?)

5. How can the Sabbath be changed to the first day of the week when the first day is called “one/first from the Sabbath?” (Gk.)

“The 30-Second, Law-Hermeneutic Test”

Here’s a simple test to identify anyone’s law hermeneutic in less than 30 seconds. If a Christian child dishonors his parents, which command did he violate?

    1. Both Ex. 20:12 and Eph. 6:1 (Covenant Theology)
    2. Neither Ex. 20:12 or Eph. 6:1 (Antinomianism)
    3. Only Eph. 6:1, not Ex. 20:12 (New Covenant Theology)

That test will clearly and instantly define anyone’s nomology.

Many Covenant Theologians, Seventh Day Adventists, and others are reading the Bible study “22 Reasons Why All Old Testament Commands Are Canceled and We Must Obey All New Testament Commands.” If you have a question about it, please post it publicly here on this blog (rather than privately by email.)

P.S. Here are the next 6 blog posts coming soon…

1. “12 Questions to Ask When Searching for a Church”

2. “How Much of the Bible Should We Preach, Part or All of it?”

3. Book Review of “God’s Big Picture” by Vaughn Roberts

4. “3 Advantages to Preaching From Long Passages Instead of Short Passages”

5. Book Review of “The Reformers and Their Stepchildren” by Leonard Verduin

P.S. See more Bible studies, blogs, and books at JesusSaidFollowMe.org

“Why Limited Atonement Is Not Part of the Gospel”

March 3rd, 2007

By Greg Gibson

(The following is an edited post I made to an email list.)

The question of the relationship between the gospel and Limited Atonement (a.k.a. “definite atonement” or “particular redemption”) arose when a brother linked to an article titled “Ernest Reisinger on the Importance of the Doctrine of Limited Atonement to Gospel Proclamation.” I objected to 2 major parts of that article…

    1. I objected to the title “Ernest Reisinger on the Importance of the Doctrine of Limited Atonement to Gospel Proclamation” because I knew that in the 49 gospel proclamations to Jews and Gentiles in Acts, the apostles never once proclaimed Limited Atonement.

    2. I objected to the conclusion: “His work specifically on behalf of those previously chosen to be His people– is clearly proclaimed and is foundational to a right understanding of the Gospel. If this pillar of the biblical foundation is removed, then the majestic Gospel of Grace will eventually crumble.” The word “foundation” seems to imply that it’s a necessary part of the gospel to the lost, and a fundamental of the faith.

(However, the brother later clarified his meaning, explaining that he rarely proclaims Limited Atonement to the lost.)

Now, I”m going to try to summarize my understanding of the “non-relationship” between limited atonement and the content of the gospel. Below, you’ll see why I believe we should not normally explain Limited Atonement to the lost in private evangelism or when specifically addressing the lost in a mixed audience of believers and unbelievers.

First, W.E. Vine rightly distinguishes between 2 definitions for “gospel”…

    The Apostle uses it of two associated yet distinct things,
    (a) of the basic facts of the death, burial and resurrection of Christ, e.g., 1 Cor. 15:1-3; (GG: and Acts)
    (b) of the interpretation of these facts, e.g., Rom. 2:16; Gal. 1:7, 11; 2:2.

    In (a) the gospel is viewed historically, in (b) doctrinally, with reference to the interpretation of the facts.” (Vine, Expository Dictionary of New Testament Words)

The definition of the gospel we’re considering here is the historical facts of the gospel for the lost, not the gospel interpreted for the Church. And, the issue here is, “What were the audible words the apostles said, not what their hearers understood,” (since we’re not mind readers.)

1. Limited Atonement is the view that Christ died only for the elect (Calvinism). Universal Atonement is the view that Christ died for both the elect and non-elect (Arminianism). I believe that Limited Atonement is true, and Universal Atonement is false.

2. The only correct and complete definition of Limited Atonement must include limiting/exclusive language somewhat synonymous to this:

    A. “Christ died only for (one group).”
    or
    B. “Christ did not die for (another group).”

3. Substitutionary Atonement is not Limited Atonement (Many Arminians believe in Substitutionary Atonement, yet deny Limited Atonement.) Many Calvinists have erroneously tried to defend Limited Atonement with prooftexts about Substitutionary Atonement, such as “The Good Shepherd gives His life for His sheep.” However, it is a logical fallacy to conclude that Substitutionary Atonement implies Limited Atonement. Here is the fallacy defined…

The Logical Fallacy That Substitutionary Atonement
Implies Limited Atonement

    1st Premise: Christ died for His sheep specifically.
    Assumed Premise: (Specificity = exclusivity).
    Conclusion: Christ died for His sheep exclusively.

As you can see, the 2nd premise is assumed. In case there are still any doubts in your mind that Substitutionary Atonement doesn’t prove Limited Atonement, Galatians 2:20 settles it beyond question…

    “the Son of God, who loved me and gave Himself for me.”

Now, here’s the above logical fallacy using Galatians 2:20…

    1st Premise: The Son of God gave Himself for Paul specifically.
    Assumed Premise: (Specificity = exclusivity.)
    Conclusion: The Son of God gave Himself for Paul exclusively.

Now, can you see that Substitutionary Atonement does not logically imply Limited Atonement? Case closed!

At least 2 other Calvinist theologians have also conceded this point, Robert Reymond and Wayne Grudem…

    “It is true, of course, that logically a statement of particularity in itself does not necessarily preclude universality. This may be shown by the principle of subalternation in Aristotelian logic, which states that if all S is P, then it may be inferred that some S is P, but conversely, it cannot be inferred from the fact that some S is P that the remainder of S is not P. A case in point is the “me” of Galatians 2:20: the fact that Christ died for Paul individually does not mean that Christ died only for Paul and for no one else.” (Reymond, A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith, p. 673-4. GG: Although, his following paragraphs seem a bit unclear.)

    “With regard to the verses that talk of Christ’s dying for his sheep, his church, or his people, non-Reformed people may answer that these passages do not deny that He died to pay the penalty for others as well. In response, while it is true that they do not explicitly deny that Christ died for others as well, their frequent reference to His death for His people would at lieast strongly suggest that this is a correct inference. Even if they do not absolutely imply such a particularizing of redemption, these verses do at least seem to be most naturally interpreted in this way.” (Grudem, Systematic Theology, p. 600.)

4. Just as Christ and the apostles never once systematized the Trinity by stating that “The Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are one God,” so they never systematized Limited Atonement by stating that “Christ died only for…” or “Christ did not die for…” Like the Trinity, Limited Atonement is true by reasoning/systematizing multiple verses, not from any one, explicit statement/verse.

Another Calvinist who has conceded this point is Dr. Matthew McMahon…

    “But never do we find Jesus preaching on the hillside His limited atonement for some men in any explicit manner. He never says, “I only died for the elect.” A Brief Critique of Hyper-Calvinism by Dr. Matthew McMahon)

Conclusions

1. Since Christ and the apostles never stated in their gospel to the lost that “Christ died only for…”, then it can’t be a gospel norm or “foundation.” (Neither can it be a fundamental of the faith nor test of faith: Outside the Camp.) There is no evidence that the apostles understood, disbelieved, or believed Limited Atonement.

2. There’s no evidence that the the majority of apostolic fathers understood, disbelieved, or believed Limited Atonement. (Like many believers today, most of them probably never thought about the question or did the logic.)

Even Godfrey, Ferguson and Packer seem to concede this…

    “Limited Atonement…This view emerged clearly among the followers of Augustine as a consequence of his teaching of sovereign, particular grace in salvation. Throughout the Middle Ages Augustinians like Prosper of Aquitaine, Thomas Bradwardine and Joh Staupitz taught a limited atonement.” (Godfrey, Prof. Westminster Seminary, New Dictionary of Theology, IVP, Ferguson, Packer, Wright, Ed’s. p. 57.)

In my early, Christian life, I often claimed that the 5 Points of Calvinism were the universal faith of the early Church. And, I appealed to The Cause of God and Truth by John Gill as my proof. However, upon a closer look at his alleged Limited Atonement quotes by the apostolic fathers, most of them only prove Substitutionary Atonement, not Limited Atonement.

Limited Atonement was created in later in church history, not 30 A.D.

3. Calvinists should not use Limited Atonement as a test of fellowship.

4. Calvinists should not use Limited Atonement as a sign of Christian maturity.

5. Gospels that include Limited Atonement and other truths of advanced, systematic theology may be too confusing for the majority of hearers who have little understanding of logic or philosophy. If we want to see the masses saved, stick to the basics in evangelism.

Advanced, complex gospels appeal to only the 5% of hearers who are highly-educated, think analytically, logically, or philosophically (not many in this TV-brain culture.) But, the simple historical facts of the gospel the apostles preached can be understood by 100% of hearers, even children, retards, and high-school dropouts.

Those who preach a gospel including advanced, systematic theology really need to think about the milk vs. meat distinction in Heb. 5:12. Granted, this was addressed to believers, but notice that the milk they failed to outgrow was basic gospel-related truths…

“Therefore leaving the discussion of the elementary principles of Christ, let us go on to perfection, not laying again the foundation
of…

  1. Repentance
  2. Faith
  3. Baptism
  4. Laying on of hands
  5. Resurrection of the dead
  6. Judgment

And, what is the meat for the mature in the context of Heb. 6? It’s the truth of apostasy/perseverance, related to the 5th point of Calvinism.

I repeat, if we want to see thousands saved, instead of a few, we would be wise to copy the content of the apostles “milk-gospel” as much as possible. Serve the milk for justification, then the meat for sanctification.

If we want to see the same results as the apostles, then we should preach the same gospel content as the apostles. They emphasized the historical facts about the Lord Jesus Christ, especially that…

  1. He lived.
  2. He died.
  3. He rose.
  4. He ascended.
  5. He reigns.
  6. He’s returning.

And, they told hearers, “Repent of your sin, and believe on Him.”

This is the powerful gospel that God used to change the 1st century world. And, this is the powerful gospel that He can use to change the 21st century world. “Preach the gospel.”

“No Biblical Evidence That Lord’s Day = Sunday-Sabbath”

January 13th, 2007

By Greg Gibson

“I was in the Spirit in the Lord’s day” (Revelation 1:10)

Have you ever heard Sunday called “the Lord’s Day?” Reformed, Covenant Theology believes that the Lord’s Day = Sunday = the Sabbath.

Here is their Lord’s Day/Sabbath view defined by the Westminster Confession of Faith and the Second London Baptist Confession of Faith of 1689…

    “…He hath particularly appointed one day in seven, for a Sabbath, to be kept holy unto Him; which from the beginning of the world to the resurrection of Christ, was the last day of the week; and, from the resurrection of Christ, was changed into the first day of the week, which, (in Scripture [W.C.F. only]) is called the Lord’s Day, and is to be continued to the end of the world, as the Christian Sabbath.” (W.C.F. 21:7; 1689 L.B.C.F 22:7)

Let’s examine Revelation 1:10 more closely to see if it’s really true that the Lord’s Day = the Sabbath…

In Revelation, John’s 3 Other Uses of “In the Spirit”
Refer to a Future, Eschatological Time, Not the 1st Century

    “…I will show you what must take place after this. At once I was in the Spirit…” (Revelation 4:1-2; Rev. ch. 4-22: the first century - the end of time)

    “Come, I will show you the judgment of the great prostitute….And he carried me awayin the Spirit into a wilderness, and I saw a woman sitting on a scarlet beast that was full of blasphemous names, and it had seven heads and ten horns.” (Revelation 17:3; the future, final judgment of Babylon at the end of time)

    “Come, I will show you the Bride, the wife of the Lamb. And he carried me away in the Spirit to a great, high mountain, and showed me the holy city Jerusalem coming down out of heaven from God,” (Revelation 21:9-10; the future, descent of the New Jerusalem to the new earth at the end of time)

Since in Revelation, John’s 3 other uses of “in the Spirit” refer to a prophetic revelation about a future, eschatological time, it’s likely that Revelation 1:10 also refers to a future, eschatological time, not the day John wrote on in the first century.

6 Things Revelation 1:10 Does Not Say

Many years ago while listening to an audiotape about the Sabbath, the teacher observed that Revelation 1:10 says nothing about the Sabbath. All of a sudden, a lightbulb turned-on in my head, and I felt like I fell out of my theological chair!

You see, for the first 10 years of my Christian life, whenever anyone said, “Lord’s Day,” my mind thought “Sabbath.” Why? Because men had told me that the the Lord’s Day = the Sabbath. But, when I took a fresh look at Revelation 1:10, I realized that it says nothing about the Sabbath. As a matter of fact, here are 6 things that Revelation 1:10 does not say…

    1. The Sabbath

    2. Seventh day of the week

    3. First day of the week

    4. Rest

    5. Work

    6. Worship

These 6 ideas have been assumed, and read into (eisegesis) the passage, instead of read out of (exegesis) the passage. But notice, Revelation 1:10 is a description, not a prescription. In other words, it’s a fact, not a command. It’s an indicative, not an imperative. John was in the Spirit on the Lord’s Day, period. It doesn’t command…

    “Keep the Lord’s Day”

    “You shall not work on the Lord’s Day”

    “Rest on the Lord’s Day”

    “Worship on the Lord’s Day”

All of these duties have been read into Revelation 1:10 by Sabbatarians.

How Often Is the Lord’s Day?

How often is the the Lord’s Day? Or, what is the frequency of the Lord’s Day? Sabbatarians assume the Lord’s Day is weekly. But, the verse says nothing about it’s frequency. Maybe the Lord’s Day is…

    1. Daily like “exhort one another every day, as long as it is called ‘today?’”

    2. Weekly like the Sabbath?

    3. Monthly like the New Moon Festival?

    4. Annually like the Day of Atonement?

    5. Every 50 years like the Day of Jubilee?

    6. Once like the Day of the Lord?

Remember, we saw that Revelation 1:10 says nothing about…

    “One day in seven”

    “Every week”

    “The seventh day of the week”

    “The first day of the week”

Clearly, no one can know from Revelation 1:10 how often the Lord’s Day occurs. To claim that the Lord’s Day is weekly is merely an assumption.

The Book of Revelation Climaxes in the Day of the Lord

The timing of Revelation’s prophecies (ch. 4-22) stretches from the first century to the end of time. However, they climax at the end of time in the day of the Lord…

    “…the great day of God the Almighty. Behold, I am coming like a thief…” (Revelation 16:14-15)

    “for the great day of their wrath has come…” (Revelation 6:17)

    “…the day of the Lord will come like a thief in the night…then sudden destruction will come upon them…” (1 Thessalonians 5:2)

    “But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, and then the heavens will pass away with a roar, and the heavenly bodies will be burned up and dissolved…” (2 Peter 3:10)

    “The sky vanished like a scroll that is being rolled up, and every mountain and island was removed from its place.” (Revelation 6:14)

    “…From His presence earth and sky fled away, and no place was found for them.” (Revelation 20:11)

    “…for the first heaven and the first earth had passed away…” (Revelation 21:1)

    “….we ask you, brothers, not to be quickly shaken in mind or alarmed…that the day of the Lord has come…For that day will not come, unless the rebellion comes first, and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction…” (2 Thessalonians 2:1-3; cf. Rev. ch. 13)

No Biblical Evidence for Lord’s Day = Sunday = Sabbath

There is no Biblical evidence that the Lord’s Day is the Sabbath or Sunday. I repeat, there is zero evidence in the Bible that the Lord’s Day is Sunday or the Sabbath. Sabbath-keeping has been read into Revelation 1:10. We should not call Sunday “the Lord’s Day.”

(There is some historical evidence that the Lord’s Day may be Sunday. But, that early evidence is based on questionable sources and questionable interpretations. The later evidence is more credible.)

Some Biblical Evidence for Lord’s Day = Day of the Lord

Since “in the Spirit” in Revelation refers to a future, eschatological time, and Revelation climaxes in the Day of the Lord, there is some Biblical evidence that the Lord’s Day may be the Day of the Lord. Let us eagerly anticipate that day by living holy, godly, and pure lives, that we may be unashamed at His coming. (2 Peter 3:11-14; 1 John 2:28-3:3)

Old Testament Commands Quoted in the New Testament Have Been Transferred

December 4th, 2006

By Greg Gibson

Perhaps someone will raise the objection to New Covenant Theology, “How can all Old Testament commands be cancelled, when some of them are quoted in the New Testament?” But, their assumption is that quotation = continuation. There’s another possibility…

Old Testament commands quoted in the New Testament have been transferred, reinstated, and canonized into the New Covenant canon. (To simplify it, let’s just say they’ve been “transferred.” Maybe an analogy from contract law will help to illustrate this…

Suppose your home has a mortgage containing the clause “Borrower may not paint the house with polka dots or stripes.” Then, suppose you refinance the mortgage for a lower interest rate with the same lender. And, the lender transfers the above clause to your new mortgage like this, “As the old mortgage stated, borrower may not paint the house with polka dots or stripes.”

Now, suppose you’re feeling rebellious, and you decide to paint the house with pink polka dots. Which mortgage did you violate, the old mortgage or the new mortgage? Obviously, you violated the new mortgage, since the old mortgage was cancelled, and the painting clause was transferred to the new mortgage.

And, it’s the same way with the old and new covenants. If a new covenant saint commits adultery, he has violated Romans 13:9, not Exodus 20:14.

To sum it up, the new covenant is not a postscript (P.S.), addendum, or codicil to the old covenant. The new covenant is a new and separate contract.

If this leaves some questions in your mind, I’ll explain in more detail in the book:

“ALL Old Testament Laws Cancelled”
24 Reasons Why All Old Testament Laws Are Cancelled
And All New Testament Laws Are for Our Obedience
New Covenant Theology