Home   Bible Studies   Blog   About   Helpful Links   Contact

Indicative-Imperative Balance Depends on Hearers’ Needs

August 30th, 2011
By Greg Gibson

GG: Some wise words on how to motivate disciples to obey Christ…

“Many of you already know that on various blogs, including The Gospel Coalition, there has been a discussion concerning gospel indicatives and gospel imperatives in the sanctification process. It is not difficult to see how this debate has significant influence in the realm of biblical counseling…The crux of the debate seems to be the relative balance given to the communication of these two concepts in the sanctification process…allow the imbalances to drive you back to the text and find out what kind of balance the text of Scripture has…

I think the balance found is Scripture is an interesting one. There are some books, like the gospel of John, which have very few commands given to the readers (most of the commands take place between the various persons in the various accounts). John’s purpose is very clear according to John 20:30-31 – he wrote so that the reader would believe that the Messiah is Jesus and that by believing the reader would have life. So the whole book is given to prove two points and those two points would encourage belief. If I take my theology from John I would have to conclude that you give truth 90% of the time. Why focus on application? Why focus on command? Give truth and the rest will come.

In the book of James, however, imperatives are found in 1 out of every 3 verses. Apparently, James did not feel the same need to give long discussions of gospel indicatives before giving numerous commands. Admittedly, gospel indicatives still form the foundation of the command, but the way that James commands is a bit different than we find in many other books.

The book of Hebrews includes commands in about 1 out of every 10 verses. However, one must admit that the imperatives found in Hebrews are some of the most potent in the entire NT. What Hebrews lacks in quantity is more than made up for in potency. The ratio in Colossians is almost 1 in 3 verses (slightly less in Ephesians and 2 Timothy), while 2 Corinthians has an imperative to verse ratio of 1 to 15. Why the diversity? Why is the balance in one of Paul’s book so high and in a different book it is very low?

While these stats do not tell the whole story, they do give us a clue into how Scripture might encourage us to strike the balance. Maybe the Scripture demonstrates that there were different needs among the various peoples in various locations. Some folks needed to be reminded of all that Christ had done, while others needed a bit more exhortation. Maybe the wise biblical counselor will do the same. The wise counselor will not only exegete the meaning of the text, but they will also exegete the people they are trying to help. The balance of indicative to imperative is different depending on context.” Gospel Indicatives And Imperatives: Where Is The Debate Anyway? By Rob Green

GG: Here are 2 ways to maintain the Holy Spirit’s inspired balance:
1. Consecutive expository preaching through whole books of the Bible.
2. Avoid pet doctrines by emphasizing the explicit more than the alleged implicit.

Simplistic Sanctification: No Single Key

August 13th, 2011

By Greg Gibson

Have you ever searched for THE key to Christian growth? Here are a couple of helpful excerpts from an article “Sanctification and the Nature of the Gospel” by William Evans…

“According to Tchividjian and others, the heart of the gospel is the message of justification by grace through faith, and everything else is extracted from this center (GG: But most of the gospel messages in Acts omit justification. So did the apostles omit ‘the heart of the gospel?’)…The fact of the matter is that the heart of the gospel is not justification. Nor is it sanctification.”

“It is Jesus Christ himself, who is ‘our wisdom and our righteousness and sanctification and redemption’ (1 Corinthians 1:30). The Apostle Paul came preaching ‘Christ crucified’ (1 Corinthians 1:23) and more often than not he directed Christians, not to their own justification, but to the crucified and risen Christ in whom they are both justified and sanctified…”

“Over the years we have seen a number of Protestant quests for the ’silver bullet’ of sanctification. The holiness writers told us that if we can somehow attain to that second work of grace all will be well. The Keswick authors argued that if we just ‘let go and let God have his wonderful way, our doubts will all vanish, our night turn to day.’ The problem here was twofold–these proposals were unbiblical and they didn’t work–and Reformed theologians of an earlier generation were right to cry foul.”

“Now some would have us believe that if we just really get the doctrine of justification then sanctification will inevitably ensue. The biblical picture of sanctification, however, is much more comprehensive…” Sanctification and the Nature of the Gospel by William Evans

“What the Bible Says About Earthquakes” (No More Earthquakes in the New Earth)

March 16th, 2011
By Greg Gibson

In light of the recent earthquakes in Japan, it’s a good time to ask the question, “What does God say in the Bible about earthquakes?” Here’s a helpful Bible study from The New Topical Textbook by R.A. Torrey: The Bible on Earthquakes.

Let’s continue to pray that God will have compassion and…

  • Send workers to rescue the trapped.
  • Heal the injured.
  • Feed the hungry.
  • Protect those in danger.

And may the Christians in Japan have compassion and wisdom speaking the gospel of hope to the fearful and grieving.

P.S. In the Bible study above, Torrey forgot the most important earthquake in the Bible, the last earthquake in history, the only earthquake I’m looking forward to…

“25 See that you do not reject the One who speaks; for if they did not escape when they rejected Him who warned them on earth, even less will we if we turn away from Him who warns us from heaven. 26 His voice shook the earth at that time, but now He has promised, Yet once more I will shake not only the earth but also heaven. 27 Now this expression, ‘Yet once more,’ indicates the removal of what can be shaken — that is, created things—so that what is not shaken might remain. 28 Therefore, since we are receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, let us hold on to grace. By it, we may serve God acceptably, with reverence and awe; 29 for our God is a consuming fire” (Heb. 12:25-29, HCSB).

There will be no more earthquakes when the kingdom of heaven comes down to the new earth at the end.

Best Blogs Digest: For Busy Disciples (Feb. 2011)

March 1st, 2011

I’m sorry, but due to health and time limitations, I can not write the Best Blogs Digest this month. Please check back next month.

Best Blogs Digest: For Busy Disciples (Jan. 2011)

January 31st, 2011

How Would You Summarize the Bible’s Message in One Sentence?
26 Christian leaders reply. Here are 2 of my favorites…
“Kevin DeYoung: A holy God sends his righteous Son to die for unrighteous sinners so we can be holy and live happily with God forever…
Tom Schreiner: God reigns over all things for his glory, but we will only enjoy his saving reign in the new heavens and the new earth if we repent and believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ, who is the crucified and risen Lord and who gave himself on the cross for our salvation.” What’s the Message of the Bible in One Sentence? by Dane Ortlund

How to Teach Calvinism to Arminians
“In other words, we are Calvinists. But that label is not nearly as useful as telling people what you actually believe! So forget the label, if it helps, and tell them clearly, without evasion or ambiguity, what you believe about salvation. If they say, ‘Are you a Calvinist?’ say, ‘You decide. Here is what I believe…’” Saying What You Believe Is Clearer Than Saying “Calvinist” by John Piper

Top 5 Books on Calvinism
1. Still Sovereign by Thomas Schreiner and Bruce Ware
2. God’s Lesser Glory: The Diminished God of Open Theism by Bruce Ware
3. Evangelism and the Sovereignty of God, by J. I. Packer
4. Divine Sovereignty and Human Responsibility by Don Carson
5. Trusting God by Jerry Bridges
Top Five Books on Calvinism by Sam Storms

Top 10 Trends in Biblical Counseling
“here are the top ten positive trends that I see in biblical counseling today” including…
“1. A Gospel-Centered Focus
Biblical counselors are emphasizing that wise counseling centers on Jesus Christ—his sinless life, death on the cross, burial, resurrection, ascension, and promised return. Biblical counseling points people to a person, Jesus our Redeemer, and not to a program, theory, or experience. We place our trust not in any human system but in the transformative power of the Redeemer as the only hope to change people’s hearts. Wise counselors seek to lead struggling, hurting, sinning, and confused people to the hope, resources, strength, and life that are available only in Christ…
5. A Comprehensive Model
In the past, biblical counseling might have been seen by some as somewhat one-dimensional with a focus on combating the impact of the fall/sin. Today, biblical counseling comprehensively examines creation (understanding people from God’s original design), fall (diagnosing problems resulting from sin), and redemption (prescribing God’s solutions through our salvation and sanctification in Christ).” The Top Ten Trends in Biblical Counseling by Bob Kellemen

Top 10 Counterfeit Gospels
“Below is a list of counterfeits I considered. I’m interested to see which ones you think are most prominent. Take the poll below and let me know” Which Counterfeit Gospels are Most Prevalent Today? by Trevin Wax

One Wife’s Rebellion Is Another Wife’s Submission
“When we move beyond the generalities of gender roles, we find that the specifics may look very, very different from one couple to another. Within the Bible’s general guidelines, there are many ways to work out the details…Which is to say that the way my wife submits to me, as the leader in the home, may look quite different from the way another wife submits to her own husband…If a wife wants to know if she is submitting to her husband, it may be that the better question for her to ask is, ‘Am I actively rebelling against his leadership?’ It’s not a matter of the particulars of what she does compared to other women, but whether she is following her husband as he leads her into being his perfect complement.” Whose Wife Are You? by Tim Challies

Law-Gospel Distiniction or Divisiveness?
“Mike Horton (MH): The Gospel can’t be lived. It’s the Law that’s lived. We obey the commands that we find in Scripture, we do not—the Gospel is not anything for us to do.”
GG: “those who do not OBEY THE GOSPEL of our Lord Jesus” (2 Thes. 1:8).
“those who DISOBEY THE GOSPEL of God?” (1 Pet. 4:17).
“we are proclaiming GOOD NEWS to you that you should TURN from these worthless things to the living God” (Acts 14:15).
“Frank Turk: but often WHI denigrates people who would say in concrete ways that they enjoy the Gospel — that they live for it and by it and through it.
Kim Riddlebarger (KR): we believe the Gospel, we obey the Law—and if you are not clear about that, then you’re going to go off on a mission and as you risk, as Jesus warned, making people more fit for Hell than they were before.”
“John Frame: It has become increasingly common in Reformed circles, as it has long been in Lutheran circles, to say that the distinction between law and gospel is the key to sound theology, even to say that to differ with certain traditional formulations of this distinction is to deny the gospel itself…The sharp distinction between law and gospel is becoming popular in Reformed, as well as Lutheran circles. It is the view of Westminster Seminary California, Modern Reformation magazine, and the White Horse Inn radio broadcast. The leaders of these organizations are very insistent that theirs is the only biblical view of the matter. One has recently claimed that people who hold a different view repudiate the Reformation and even deny the gospel itself…I believe that we should stand with the Scriptures against this tradition.
GG: The first time I heard the claim that the whole Bible can be divided into either law or gospel, I thought it sounded simplistic and reductionistic. When was the law-gospel distinction invented, the 16th century? If so, how could 15 centuries of Christians be ignorant of this gospel truth? Why did God not reveal this Bible key explicitly (instead of implicitly, as they claim?)
As the verses above and John Frame below show, the gospel includes the commands to repent, believe, and obey. A far more accurate distinction than law-gospel is indicative (truth)-imperative (command). And between those 2, we need Biblical balance. Open Letter to Michael Horton by Frank Turk, and Law and Gospel by John Frame

Best Blogs Digest: For Busy Disciples (Dec. 2010)

December 31st, 2010

“We’re NOT Like All the Other Churches”
Let’s Rejoice More in Christ Than Our Distinctives

If you wrote a list of what you want in a church, what would be #1?
“Even though the gospel was preached in Rob’s church, the deacons seemed to save their heartiest ‘Amens’ for whenever the preacher went off script and started reminding them of all that set their church apart from the others in town. The preacher and congregation took pride in the fact that their church was traditional…He sits down one evening and writes out a list of all the things important to his church experience. By the time he puts the pen down, he is frustrated that he can’t find ‘the right church.’…
Rob’s church and Kelli’s church look very different, and yet they are very much the same. Both churches proclaim the gospel, but both center their identity in aesthetic tastes and styles. The gospel is preached, but the style is what’s celebrated.
Week after week, the churches emphasize and celebrate what makes them different from other churches. They celebrate their uniqueness – not the gospel uniqueness that shines light in a dark world, but a worldly uniqueness that would have us base our identity in stylistic distinctions between brothers and sisters.
Whenever we are formed within a context that celebrates certain cultural expressions over against other expressions, we begin to expect the wrong things from a church. So when the day comes for us to unite with a different congregation, our list of expectations is devoid of the gospel. The saddest result of Kelli and Rob’s church search is that neither of them were looking primarily for a church that preached and celebrated the gospel. They were lost in a sea of peripheral issues because that is what their churches had celebrated.
Pastors and church leaders, it’s important that we believe the gospel; it’s also important that we celebrate this gospel in a way that makes clear it is ‘of first importance’.
What do we celebrate as a church?…I pray that we celebrate the gospel in a way that leads our church members to easily cross cultural divides because of the centrality of the cross. What we celebrate is just as important as what we believe.
‘D.A. Carson: I have been teaching more decades now that I can count and if I have learned anything from all of this teaching, its this: my students…learn what I’m excited about. So within the church of the living God, we must become excited about the gospel…But, at this point, the gospel is not what really captures us. Rather, is a particular form of worship or a particular style of counseling, or a particular view on culture, or a particular technique in preaching, or – fill in the blank. Then, ultimately, our students make that their center…’” What You Celebrate as a Church is Just as Important as What You Believe by Trevin Wax

Can Children Understand the Preaching?
Remember, the smartest man who ever lived was able to explain deep doctrinal truths so that uneducated farmers and fishermen could understand. One of the best cures for “scholarism” is to teach children’s Bible study. If you can explain God’s Word to kids, you can explain it to anyone.
“However, in many circles, especially perhaps in some Reformed churches, we may be in danger of over-complicating sermons.” A Plea for Profound Simplicity by David Murray

Ms. Pastor? Encouraging Women More How They Can Serve Than How They Can’t
The best sermon I ever heard on women in the church was by Erwin Lutzer. He showed how God used women in redemptive history from Genesis - Revelation: Eve, Sarah, Deborah, Mary, Lydia, etc. He focused more on what women could do than what they can’t do (pastor).
“Few issues are so hotly debated today in evangelicalism as the issue of women in leadership…Yet just as there are common themes that tend to run through conversion stories, so too there are three common factors that emerge as chief influences in the lives of the contributors to this volume. While not true of every essay, the following pattern is consistent:
1. The author was raised in a fundamentalist Christian background that was highly restrictive of women’s involvement in the church (this accounts for about half of the essays).
2. The author married, or was herself, a highly capable woman with strong leadership capabilities (this was true in nearly every essay).
3. The author revisited Scripture, reinterpreting the ‘restrictive’ passages of the New Testament in light of the ‘broad sweep of the biblical narrative,’ which he or she saw as indicating freedom for women to serve in any leadership capacity within the church…
What follows are…points of application/observation that complementarians can glean from How I Changed My Mind:
1. Most significantly, many women have genuine pain and confusion about their place within the church…Compassion, not simply confrontation, is needed at precisely this point…
2. In light of the above, complementarians need to make as much room as possible for women to exercise their considerable giftedness within the church…Indeed. When complementarians become more preoccupied with telling women what they can’t do, rather than resourcing them for what they can do, the church as a whole suffers for it.” How I Changed My Mind About Women in Leadership by Gerald Hiestand

Top 10 Theology Stories of 2010
1. Francis Chan Resigns, 2. N.T. Wright Clarifies, 3. John Piper Rests, 4. David Platt Challenges, 5. Glenn Beck Mormonizes, 6. Matt Chandler Suffers, 7. Ergun Caner Fired, 8. Philip Ryken Hired, 9. BioLogos Evolved, 10. Crystal Cathedral Bankrupt. My Top Ten Theology and Church Stories from 2010 by Colin Hansen

Top 10 Christian Books 2010
Of all the Top 10 Book lists I’ve seen, this is my favorite. Top Ten Books of 2010 by Chad Knudson

O.T. Promises to Israel Fulfilled by the New Israel: Jesus
“In the gospel of Matthew, Jesus is cast as the true and faithful Israel. Matthew is retelling Israel’s well known story, but he’s putting Jesus right in the middle as the main character in the story. Jesus is the new Israel…
Not only is Jesus the new Genesis, his life embodies the new Exodus…
Following right on the heels of Jesus’ exodus out of Egypt, we come to his baptism in the Jordan in Matthew 3. Again, I don’t think Matthew is trying to be speak in secret code, and he certainly isn’t making the stories up, but he has arranged the material in such a way as to retell Israel’s story, with Jesus now as the true Israel. So just like the Israelites left Egypt and then passed through the Red Sea (baptized into the sea according 1 Cor. 10:2), Jesus too leaves Egypt and passes through the waters in his baptism.
Just to point out one more parallel, think what happens to the Israelites after they pass through the Red Sea. They wind up in the desert where they wander for forty years. And where is Jesus in Matthew 4 after his baptism? He is in the desert about to be tempted after having fasted for forty days and forty nights.” Out of Egypt I Called My Son by Kevin DeYoung

How the NT Interprets the OT
“1. Keep in mind the NT’s purpose in referencing the OT.
2. Along these lines, remember the NT often uses the OT simply as a vehicle of expression.
3. The NT may press home the significance of a passage without trying to explain its original meaning.
4. We must allow for a broader view of ‘fulfillment’ language.
5. Similarly, some OT passages are fulfilled typologically.
6. OT prophecy is full of examples where there is a near and far fulfillment….
The other lesson is that we need not be embarrassed to use a strong theological lens on top of our appropriate grammatical-historical lens. This is not an invitation to allegory or a reason to search for hidden spiritual meanings…But it does mean we should, like the NT writers did, read the Bible across the whole Bible. We should see Jesus in all of Scripture. We should read the end in the light of the beginning and the beginning in view of the end. Above all, we can celebrate that Jesus is the perfect fulfillment of all that was imperfectly prefigured in the OT.” Can That Be Right? The New Testament’s Use of Old Testament Prophecy by Kevin DeYoung

Culture’s Sentimental Love vs. God’s Holy Love
“1. Applied to God, the sentimental view generates a deity with all the awesome holiness of a cuddly toy, all the moral integrity of a marshmallow. In the previous lectures, I briefly documented this point with examples from films and books.
2. Applied to Christians, the sentimental view breeds expectations of transcendental niceness. Whatever else Christians should be, they should be nice, where “niceness” means smiling a lot and never ever hinting that anyone may be wrong about anything (because that isn’t nice).
3. In the local church, it means abandoning church discipline (it isn’t nice), and in many contexts it means restoring adulterers (for instance) to pastoral office at the mere hint of broken repentance. After all, isn’t the church about forgiveness? Aren’t we supposed to love one another? And doesn’t that mean that above all we must be, well, nice?
4. Similarly with respect to doctrine: the letter kills, while the Spirit gives life, and everyone knows the Spirit is nice. So let us love one another and refrain from becoming upright and uptight about this divisive thing called “doctrine.” (pp. 11–12; numbering added) Popular Culture’s View of Love by D.A. Carson

Finding Your Place in God’s Story
Free audio and video of The God Who Is There: Finding Your Place in God’s Story by D. A. Carson. “This series will serve the church well because it simultaneously evangelizes non-Christians and edifies Christians by explaining the Bible’s storyline in a non-reductionistic way. The series is geared toward “seekers” and articulates Christianity in a way that causes hearers either to reject or embrace the gospel. It’s one thing to know the Bible’s storyline, but it’s another to know one’s role in God’s ongoing story of redemption.” The God Who Is There by D.A. Carson

Hypocrites on the Worship Team?
“They might ask to participate, even in public roles, perhaps as musicians. As church leaders, how should we respond to these requests?…TGC asked four other pastors, ‘Do you invite non-believers to participate in corporate gatherings of the church by playing instruments or assisting in other public roles? Why or why not?’” (GG: I agree with 9Marks.) TGC Asks: Do Non-Believers Play a Public Role in Your Church Services? by Collin Hansen

A Life Worth Modeling: Follow Roger Nicole as He Followed Christ
“J. I. Packer has a gift not only for summarizing theological truth in a concise, compact way, but also for getting to the heart of a friend’s character and legacy. A few years ago he was able to summarize Roger Nicole in a sentence:
‘Awesome for brain power, learning, and wisdom; endlessly patient and courteous in his gentle geniality; and beloved by a multitude as pastor, mentor, and friend’…The couple did not have biological children but there are 19 people in the U.S., Africa and Asia who call them Mama and Papa. ‘These are some of the students we sort of ‘adopted’ throughout my career who regard us as their parents,’ Roger Nicole said.
John Piper has written that ‘One clear mark of Christlike tenderness is love for children,’ and several of Roger Nicole’s friends have noted his love of children. David Bailey says, ‘He converses as effortlessly with a five-year old child as with an academic colleague.’
Timothy George writes of Roger and Annette, ‘For many decades they have modeled the graces of Christian hospitality. Several generations of students and colleagues have known the largesse of their table and the conviviality of their home.’…
During his lectures, several of the students, on occasion, would weep…He was gracious in handling questions from ‘difficult students.’ We were deeply impressed by his complete transparency regarding his own Christian pilgrimage, his manifest godliness, his willingness to share with the students volumes from his own library…One feels both more intellectual and more Christ-like just spending time with Roger Nicole.
David Wells, his Gordon-Conwell colleague, dedicated a collection of essays on Reformed theology to Roger Nicole, and tried to get at the ‘center’ of his theological vision:
The sovereignty of God, expressed in grace and in judgment, has always been at the center of Roger’s vision. It has led him to think globally. He has always been a strong supporter of missions because he is confident that God is great enough to accomplish his saving purposes worldwide. It has also led him to walk humbly because he knows that in our human fallenness resides no spiritual life. To know this is to be liberated from the clutches of that exaggerated and false sense of self-importance, which, in the end, undermines all human well-being. And it has given his life a serenity and stability that have been an example to his colleagues, students, and the administrators with whom he has worked. In times of crisis, he has been a source of wisdom; in turbulence, a source of strength. His unerring instinct for what is noble has touched those who have known him and has ever pointed to Jesus Christ, ‘the pioneer and perfecter of our faith.’” Roger Nicole (1915-2010) by Justin Taylor

Making Scholars or Disciples?
Scholars can be pastors. But pastors don’t need to be scholars. Most seminaries train pastors so differently than Christ trained the 12. Seminaries often focus on scholarly details and debates. Yes Jesus debated and defended the truth with details. But he focused more on the big picture gospel, character growth (faith, love, and obedience), and how to’s (evangelism, prayer, and preaching). He chose men including uneducated fishermen to lead the Church. (Only Paul, whom Jesus called later, was a scholar.)
“To qualify for college or seminary positions, a theologian must earn a PhD, ideally from a prestigious liberal university. But at such schools, there is no training in the kind of systematic theology I describe here. Liberal university theologians do not view Scripture as God’s Word, and so they cannot encourage theology as I have defined it, as the application of God’s infallible word. Students are welcome to study historical and contemporary theology, and to relate these to auxiliary disciplines such as philosophy and literary criticism. But they are not taught to seek ways of applying Scripture for the edification of God’s people. Rather, professors encourage the student to be “up-to-date” with current academic discussion and to make “original contributions” to the discussion, out of his autonomous reasoning. So when the theologian finishes his graduate work and moves to a teaching position, even if he is personally evangelical in his convictions, he often writes and teaches as he was encouraged to do in graduate school: academic comparisons and contrasts, minimal interaction with Scripture.” The Problem with and the Future of Theological Education and Scholarship by John Frame

Porn: Freedom Resources
“If you are struggling with porn, or seeking to help someone who is, there is help” “I Looked for Love in Your Eyes” by Justin Taylor

Best Blogs Digest: For Busy Disciples (Nov. 2010)

December 2nd, 2010

By Greg Gibson

Full Gospel or Partial Gospel? Edified More by Preaching Than Tongues
“One such term that I increasingly find problematic and fosters the two-tiered Christianity is “full-gospel”. The term has come to be used of as an adjective for alignment with Charismatic/Pentecostal beliefs. The implications of the term is that those who don’t embrace the full continuation of gifts today have only part of the gospel…Unfortunately, I think the terminology does a disservice to the Biblical evidence of what constitutes a spirit-filled congregation. If believers are gathered together, serving this function and building each other up in love, then I would suggest that is what constitutes a spirit-filled church…The bottom line is just because a congregation embraces the continued use of all gifts, does not necessarily make a spirit-filled church nor does not embracing the continued use of all gifts make a congregation any less spirit-filled…I have witnessed countless so-called tongues and interpretations and numerous prophecies…But to be honest, what was delivered could have been easily addressed through a powerful sermon or individual exhortation. In fact, I have been more edified through good expository preaching of scripture than through my previous experience…But my plea with this post is for all who trust in Christ as savior to recognize that everyone has been given what is necessary for growth and service (2 Peter 1:3; 2 Timothy 3:17). Continuationists do not have something more nor are cessationists missing out on what they need.” Full Gospel Christianity?: A Theology of More II

Love’s Priority Above Doctrinal Distinctives
“I find that my passions and priorities have shifted. It is no longer quite so important to me to preach NCT everywhere I go. I still hold (although more loosely now) to the basics of Calvinism, but I would not identify myself as a Calvinist. One of the finest churches I’ve attended was a church that did not call itself Reformed, and yet the love that the congregation showed to each other and the world surpassed that of any Reformed church I’ve ever seen…I would still rather have good theology and a loving and gentle heart than bad theology and those. But I would rather have bad theology and a loving and gentle heart than good theology and pride and ungraciousness.” Ramblings on Theology and Love by Louise

Imputation of Christ’s Active Obedience: A 16th Century Invention
The New Testament teaches that God credits Christ’s righteousness to us through the means of faith, and on the basis of His death and resurrection-life, not alleged substitutionary Law-keeping during His earthly life. IAO is “hyper-imputation.” It undermines the sufficiency of Christ’s righteousness and death. And it fails all 4 tests for essential doctrines: 4 Tests of Essential Doctrines.

“Advocates of IAO often insist that it is integral to evangelical orthodoxy. The implication being, to reject it is to forfeit the right to the label evangelical, or at least, orthodox evangelical. Of course the burden of proof lies with those who so claim to prove their case and it appears an exceptionally hard case to prove. Indeed, from what I have read to date, it seems an impossible task…To be fair, those who argue for IAO normally date and define ‘evangelical orthodoxy’ from the Reformation…The evidence from the Magisterial Reformers (early reformers supported by the ruling authorities) is mixed…In summary, Luther taught imputed righteousness but cannot really be clearly aligned with current IAO orthodoxy. Calvin is much more closely aligned but IAO does not have in him the emphasis it has in later formulations and present orthodoxy. He often identifies forgiveness of sins through Christ’s righteous death as the sum of justification in a way that few IAO advocates would today. Zwingli tended to moralism in justification…The case for IAO as orthodoxy in the first fifteen centuries is virtually non-existent. The case for a hard and fast IAO as a uniform part of orthodoxy among the initial reformers it would appear is far from compelling…Though it is entirely absent from the previous LBC of 1644…The truth seems to be that while many Reformed folks in the C16/17 (to say nothing of Evangelicals outside the confessionally Reformed side of Protestantism) affirmed IAO, a significant number did not and the early divines were not inclined to make the differences of the substance of the faith IAO was not considered a matter of orthodoxy thus confessions allowed for differing views on the subject…Again the case for insisting on IAO as a matter of historical evangelical orthodoxy is seen to be weak, indeed found to be wanting.” imputed-active-obedience-iao-a-must-or-a-misdirection-5/ and imputed active obedience (IAO), a must or a misdirection? (6) by John Thomson

The Meaning of Singleness
“How many times have you heard someone say, ‘He’s such a great guy, how is he still single?’ Or, ‘She’s such a catch. When will she get married off?’ The implication behind such questions is that great men and women get married, and those who are not great do not. For many, being single imprints upon them a meaning that touches their very identities: They are defective, second-rate, somehow less than others who marry. In response to this message, Scripture teaches that single Christians are not defined by their singleness, but by their union with Jesus Christ. Singleness, like marriage, is a God-given calling, not an identity…First, we must remember that Christians are not defined ultimately by their calling. Singleness is a calling, not an identity…Second, the meaning of singleness will be seen in the struggle for contentment in God. Singleness is uniquely designed to showcase the sufficiency and superiority of God, because singles are called to find in God what those who are married often find in one another…
Finally, the meaning of singleness is seen when the single Christian is actively involved in service to Christ and the church.” Singleness with Purpose by Brooks Waldron

Visitors Are Looking for Independent/Non-Denominational Churches
Mega-Churches are independent/non-denominational more than any denomination. Mega-Churches in America Chart by Jeff Young and Complete List of Mega-Churches in America by Jeff Young

History of Denominations Chart
Do you know the historical roots of your denomination? Great Chart on Denominations by Jeff Young

NIV, TNIV, and NIV 2011 Comparison Stats
Here’s a summary of the changes from the NIV (1984), TNIV, and NIV (2011)
“NIV2011 verse same as 1984: 18,666 = 60.02%
NIV2011 verse same as tNIV: 9,726 = 31.27%
NIV2011 rejected tNIV, reverted to NIV1984: 269 =.86%
NIV2011 verse verse is new: 2,440 = 7.85%
NIV2011 words same as 1984: 356,610 = 91.37%
NIV2011 changed words: 33,666 = 8.63%
NIV2011 removed words: 32,863
NIV2011 added words: 34,469″ NIV2011/NIV2010 Changes by John Dyer

55 Free, Online Books by John Piper
Read John Piper’s books free online, including “Finally Alive,” “Don’t Waste Your Life,” and “Fifty Crucial Questions About Manhood and Womanhood.” Online Books by Title by John Piper

The Church’s Mission: 7 Book Reviews
See 7 book summaries and one book excerpt. Book Reviews on the Mission of the Church by 9Marks

How to Know God’s Will: 5 Book Reviews
Wondering about a major decision? 5 Great Books on the Will of God by Tim Challies

Christians and Politics: 3 Book Reviews
Bible Inerrancy and Authority: 10 Book Reviews

Politics—According to the Bible: A Comprehensive Resource for Understanding Modern Political Issues in Light of Scripture by Wayne Grudem
Republocrat: Confessions of a Liberal Conservative by Carl R. Trueman
City of Man: Religion and Politics in a New Era by Michael Gerson and Peter Wehner. Three Books on Politics by Andrew David Naselli and Charles Naselli. And see 10 book summaries on the Bible as God’s Word by D.A. Carson and Robert Yarbrough

Best Blogs Digest: For Busy Disciples (Oct. 2010)

November 2nd, 2010

By Greg Gibson

Distinctives-Centered or Gospel-Centered?
Bob Gonzales wrote my unauthorized biography. Looks like we were both distinctives-centered instead of gospel-centered: “I also had a tendency to be hypercritical of Christians and churches that didn’t share all my beliefs and convictions – while remaining to some degree blind to my own remaining sins and weaknesses (Matt 7:1-5). Instead of focusing primarily on the central truths of the gospel, I was overly preoccupied with beliefs and practices that distinguished me from all other Christians and exalted them to a place of unwarranted priority (Matt 23:23). (GG: Emphasis mine.) As a result, I so focused on minute orthodoxy that I lost sight of brotherly love (Rev 2:2-4) and humility (1 Cor 4:7).
Related to the tendency above, I esteemed my own ecclesiastical tradition so highly that at times I forced the teaching of Scripture into the mold of my tradition or failed to hear the teaching of Scripture because I too highly venerated my tradition. Instead of reading my tradition in the light of Scripture, I tended to read Scripture in the light of my tradition. As a result, I proudly thought myself superior to other Christians (Mark 9:38-40; 1 Cor 12:21) and that I had little if anything to learn from them – only much to teach them. Worse, my veneration of human tradition sometimes invalidated the teaching and mandates of God’s own Word (Matt 15:1-9).” Confessions of a Recovering Legalist by Bob Gonzales

Why Some Covenant Theologians Are Sectarian
“Evangelicals: We can and we must distinguish between essentials and non-essentials better. Draw our circles too tightly, and we slip into fundamentalism. Draw our circles too wide, and we slip into liberalism.”

There are 2 kinds of Covenant Theologians. Those who base their fellowship on…
1. The simple gospel alone: In Acts, the apostles preached what we must believe to be saved. And in the epistles, the apostles confessed the simple gospel that unites all Christians. (1 Cor. 15:3-7; Phil. 2:6-11; 1 Tim. 3:16; Heb. 6:1-2; and 1 Jn. 4:2).
2. The simple gospel + doctrinal distinctives (like Calvinism, the Covenant of Works, the imputation of Christ’s active obedience, or Sabbath-keeping). They reason (illogically) that denying any of those 4 doctrines undermines the gospel/justification. So they look at the majority of Christ’s Church with suspicion instead of love. And they fellowship with a few “sister churces” hours away, instead of dozens of gospel-centered churches nearby. Many of these brothers are divisive and sectarian, promoting men and a movement more than a Person.

However, Michael Patton suggests 4 tests to distinguish doctrinal essentials from non-essentials:
1. Historicity: When was it invented, and how many Christians believed it? (“that which was believed everywhere, always, by everyone.”)
2. Explicitly Historical: Did the Church confess it explicitly (not by implicit logic)?
3. Biblical Clarity (Perspicuity): Is the doctrine taught clearly in Scripture?
4. Explicitly Biblical: Does any Bible text teach it explicitly (not by implicit logic)?

Parts of the 5-points of Calvinism pass and fail each of the tests. But the other 3 alleged, gospel-related doctrines above (the Covenant of Works, the imputation of Christ’s active obedience, and Sabbath-keeping) fail ALL 4 tests. “Make every effor to keep the unity of the Spirit through the bond of peace. There is one body and one Spirit” (Eph. 4:3-4). Evangelicals: We Can and Must Distinguish Between Essentials and Non-Essentials Better by C. Michael Patton

Did Anabaptist Leaders Teach Justification by Faith?
Several Anabaptist leaders, including Hubmaier, Philips, Sattler, and Simons, taught justification by faith. “Anabaptists seldom used ‘justification’ to describe their own views, for they approached the issues involved from a different angle. Like Protestants, they emphasized that God initiates the salvation process, and that individuals enter it through faith. Yet they often complained that Protestants, by emphasizing ‘faith alone’, minimized sanctification and encouraged sub-Christian behavior.”
Did Anabaptists Believe in Justification by Faith Alone? by Kent Brandenburg
Justification by the Global Anabaptist Mennonite Encyclopedia Online
The Hope of the Christian Believer According to Menno Simons by Menno Simons
Menno Simons on … justification by faith by Menno Simons

Positive Thinking Church Files Bankruptcy
“Crystal Cathedral Ministries, an Orange County landmark and megachurch founded by television evangelist Robert H. Schuller, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy Monday morning. The cathedral owes about about $7.5 million to unsecured creditors. The bankruptcy filing seeks court protection from its creditors.” Crystal Cathedral Megachurch Files for Bankruptcy by MSNBC

How to Fight Fear by Believing God’s Promises
“When I am anxious about decisions I have to make about the future, I battle unbelief with the promise, ‘I will instruct you and teach you the way you should go; I will counsel you with my eye upon you’ (Psalm 32:8).” How to Battle Anxiety with the Promises of God

Pure Churches Protect Christ’s Reputation
11 reasons why churches should remove non-attending members. What is Gained by Removing Members from Church Rolls? by Doug Richey

Best Blogs Digest: For Busy Disciples (Sept. 2010)

October 2nd, 2010
By Greg Gibson

Church Ex-Commnunicates 575 Members
Okay, why? What did they do?…
Well, it’s not so much what they did but what they didn’t do. The members we removed were no longer actively involved with our church. Half of them had moved away, and the other half still lived in the area but never worshiped with us.
Inactive membership is contrary to what the New Testament teaches about the life of the church, so our action in removing members was motivated fundamentally by a desire to become a more biblically-functioning church.
What biblical passages are you thinking about? And why is such inactive membership ‘contrary to what the New Testament teaches about the life of the church?’
The language of membership in the New Testament is metaphorical. To be a ‘member’ is to be part of a body (1 Cor 12:27) and part of a family (Eph 2:19). Both of these images depict vital relational connections. If we saw a foot in a jar on a lab shelf or met a daughter who hasn’t spoken to her parents in twenty years, we would know in both cases that something had gone wrong.” Church Disciplines 575 Members by Jonathan Leeman

12 Questions to Unmask Your Idols
“Whatever we direct our affections, energies, and hopes towards is our object of worship. Our heart needs Jesus; our flesh craves idols. This is why growing in love for Christ requires daily execution of idols. But how do we know what our idols are?Yo
1. I am preoccupied with ________.
2. If only ________, then I would be happy.
3. I get my sense of significance from ________.
4. I would protect and preserve ________ at any cost.
5. I fear losing ________.
6. The thing that gives me greatest pleasure is ________.
7. When I lose ________, I get angry, resentful, frustrated, anxious, or depressed.
8. For me, life depends on ________.
9. The thing I value more than anything in the world is ________.
10. When I daydream, my mind goes to________.
11. The best thing I can think of is ________.
12. The thing that makes me want to get out of bed in the morning is ________.” 12 Steps to Identifying Your Functional Saviors by Jared Wilson

3 Interpretations of Hell: Mythical, Literal, or Metaphorical?
“People interpret the ghastly descriptions of darkness, fire, and suffering in at least three ways.
1. Mythically. Some argue that traditional Christian conceptions of hell are a product of Roman and pagan myths.
2. Literally. Some think that the descriptions are literal, meaning that the darkness, fire, and suffering are actual darkness, fire, and suffering.
3. Metaphorically. Others say that some or all of the descriptions are metaphorical in the sense that the darkness, fire, and suffering may not be actual darkness, fire, and suffering.
John Piper explains, ‘Consider some of the word pictures of God’s wrath in the New Testament. And as you consider them remember the folly of saying, ‘But aren’t those just symbols? Isn’t fire and brimstone just a symbol?’ I say beware of that, because it does not serve your purpose. Suppose fire is a symbol. Do people use symbols of horror because the reality is less horrible or more horrible than the symbols? I don’t know of anyone who uses symbolic language for horrible realities when literal language would make it sound more horrible.
People grasp for symbols of horror (or beauty) because the reality they are trying to describe is worse (or better) than they can put into words. If I say, ‘My wife is the diamond of my life,’ I don’t want you to say, ‘Oh, he used a symbol of something valuable; it’s only a symbol. So his wife must not be as valuable as a diamond.” No. I used the symbol of the most valuable jewel I could think of because my wife is far more precious than jewels. Honest symbols are not used because they go beyond reality, but because reality goes beyond words.
So when the Bible speaks of hell-fire, woe to us if we say, ‘It’s only a symbol.’ If it is a symbol at all, it means the reality is worse than fire, not better. The word ‘fire’ is used not to make the easy sound terrible, but to make the exceedingly terrible sound something like what it really is’
We may disagree about some finer nuances of our literal and metaphorical interpretations of hell’s darkness, fire, and suffering, but we should agree that, at the very least, the New Testament teaches that hell is eternally miserable, terrifying, and painful. It’s certainly no better than being cast into literal “outer darkness” or being tormented with literal ‘fire and sulfur.’” Hellfire and Brimstone: Interpreting the New Testament’s Descriptions of Hell by Andy Naselli

Annotated Bibliography on Hell
See 7 recommended books on hell. An Annotated Bibliography on Hell by Gavin Ortlund

Hyper-Gospel Sanctification: Growth Without Obedience?
“One of the standard features of Christian ethics is that it has an indicative part (what God has done for us in in salvation) and an imperative part (how we are to live in consequence). In other words, because of what God has done for you, now you should live in a manner worthy of your salvation…Where am I going with this? Well my concern is that some are beginning to replace the imperative element in Christian sanctification (i.e., the need to diligently prosecute, pursue, and cultivate holiness and godliness) with the need for more knowledge of the indicative (i.e., believing more in the grace of God).” (GG: Remember the old hymn Trust AND Obey?) Christian Sanctification: Indicative But No Imperative? by Michael Bird

Anabaptists’ 6 Key Hermeneutics
Some Anabaptists had clear, New Testament insights on church and law. “For three quarters of its history, the European Church has operated within a Christendom framework. Only in the first three centuries, in persecuted movements between the fourth and nineteenth centuries, and in the last century has this mindset been challenged…Those who have examined the hermeneutics of the Anabaptists have identified six key components:
(1) The Bible as Self-interpreting: The widespread Anabaptist conviction that Scripture was clear enough for ordinary Christians to understand and apply without assistance of education, philosophical or theological expertise, clerical guidance or ecclesiastical tradition…(GG: Amen, how many times do Covenant Theologians reply, “You need to read this theology book [to understand God's Word]?)
(2) Christocentrism: The centrality of Jesus in Scripture was foundational for Anabaptist hermeneutics and theology. He was regarded as the one to whom all Scripture pointed and witnessed, and his words and deeds were authoritative and normative…
(3) The Two Testaments…Most were convinced that the new covenant he introduced made it impossible to put the Old Testament on the same level as the New…
(4) Spirit and Word…Accused of both literalism and spiritualism, most Anabaptists were committed both to the normative role of Scripture and to the active involvement of the Holy Spirit in the process of interpretation…
(5) Congregational Hermeneutics: This conviction that the congregation was where Scripture should be interpreted, rather than the university, the preacher’s study or the mind of the individual, was significant in some Anabaptist groups…And the Anabaptist emphasis on obedience as a prerequisite for understanding Scripture meant that only a community of would-be disciples could expect illumination. Unfaithfulness could make a congregation unable to function properly as a hermeneutic community. (GG: Amen!)
(6) Hermeneutics of Obedience: The importance attached to ethical considerations in interpreting Scripture, both in the legitimising of interpreters and the testing of their conclusions, is clear from Anabaptist writings…
The synthetic model that can be extracted from Anabaptist hermeneutical principles and practices is that of a Spirit-filled disciple, confidently interpreting Scripture within a community of such disciples, aware that Jesus Christ is the centre from which the rest of Scripture must be interpreted.” (HT: BW) Anabaptist Hermeneutics: A Summary by Stuart Murray Williams

Political Idolatry: Faith in Conservativism or Liberalism
“Both the left and the right subscribe to this Americolatry. If our government does X, Y, and Z, then we will be joyful, satisfied, safe, and complete. Then we will live in heaven. But if the other guys get their way, it’ll be hell. In that equation, God is no longer our joy, our comfort, our satisfaction, our all.” Americolatry by Justin Taylor

Best Blogs Digest: For Busy Disciples (Aug. 2010)

September 1st, 2010

By Greg Gibson

How to Use the Bible Story
“…2. How would you summarize your book’s argument in one sentence?
With biblical theology, we have in Scripture everything we need for effective ministry in the church; without it, vast sections of Scripture are nothing more than moral tales at best and irrelevant history at worst.

3. How would you summarize your book’s argument in one paragraph?
…Too often though, pastors and church leaders approach the OT as not much more than a collection of moral examples and the NT as the story of Jesus and how we get saved. But the Bible is so much more than life’s little ‘answer book’ and the world’s first evangelistic tract. It’s the story of everything; it’s the revelation of God’s grand design to glorify himself through the history of salvation. This means Scripture isn’t a story we turn to in order to answer our questions, but a story we’re in that explains us to ourselves and teaches us the questions we should be asking and the answers we need…

4. You write, ‘I think it’s fair to say that everything in the life and ministry of the local church is affected by a proper use of biblical theology’ (p. 199). How?
Biblical theology places us inside the storyline of Scripture. So good biblical theology is almost always the difference between misapplying and faithfully applying Scripture. For example, should the unemployed, barren, or disabled in your church consider themselves cursed by God, while the rich, fruitful, and strong in your church consider themselves favored? Does God-honoring worship require the use of cymbals and tambourines? Should we baptize infants, and if so, whose? Should the church seek political power and a role in civil law-making? I could go on. The answers to all of these questions, and countless more, aren’t found by simply collecting and comparing all the references in the Bible to childlessness, cymbals, or laws. They’re found by understanding the whole storyline of Scripture and where the Christian and the local church fit into it…” Interview with Michael Lawrence on Biblical Theology and the Church by Michael Lawrence

How Would You Summarize the OT’s Message in One Sentence?
“1. How would you summarize your book’s (Dominion and Dynasty) argument in one sentence?
God created humanity to rule the world in his image, and humanity was dethroned from that rule and will be re-enthroned as kings and queens of creation.” (GG:…through Messiah.) Interview with Stephen Dempster on Old Testament Theology by Andy Naselli

Summary of Hebrews’ Message by Peter O’Brien
“…1. How would you summarize the message of Hebrews?
Hebrews is a “word of exhortation” (Hebrews 13:22) sent as a letter to Christians, probably from a Jewish background, urging them to maintain their confession of Jesus Christ, the Son of God and perfect high priest (3:6, 14; 4:14; 10:23).
Through exposition the author uses the Old Testament to show the Son’s place in God’s saving plan, his superiority to angels (1:5–14), the purpose of the incarnation (2:10–18), the superiority of Jesus’ priesthood (5:1–7:28), and his high priestly offering by which he inaugurated the new covenant (8:1–10:18).
Through exhortation, which includes words of encouragement and stern warnings, as well as positive and negative examples, the author repeatedly urges his listeners to persevere faithfully in order to reach their eternal rest in the heavenly city.

2. Why did the audience of Hebrews need this message?
The members of the community had previously suffered persecution, imprisonment, public abuse, and the loss of their property (10:32–34). Now they were being called upon to endure suffering again.
They had grown weary as believers and were in danger of drifting away or, worse, willfully persisting in sin and rejecting the Son of God. Although the author does not say that they have actually committed apostasy, some are in great danger. In order to prevent such a disaster he addresses his powerful “word of exhortation” to them…” Interview with Peter O’Brien on the Letter to the Hebrews by Peter O’Brien

Pornified or Purified?
“Here’s the point: These two pictures of male sexuality are deliberately intended to drive home the point that every man must decide who he will be, whom he will serve, and how he will love. In the end, a man’s decision about pornography is a decision about his soul, a decision about his marriage, a decision about his wife, and a decision about God. Pornography is a slander against the goodness of God’s creation and a corruption of this good gift God has given his creatures out of his own self-giving love. To abuse this gift is to weaken, not only the institution of marriage, but the fabric of civilization itself. To choose lust over love is to debase humanity and to worship the false god Priapus in the most brazen form of modern idolatry.” Two Pictures: Purified vs Pornified by Al Mohler

The Gospel Nuns
“‘‘Some people come to Italy for an audience with the Pope. As for me, I’d prefer to meet with the Sorelle Evangeliche (Gospel Sisters),’ I declared, entering the home of Cristiana Gavagni and Annamaria Mazzari, a.k.a. the ‘Gospel Nuns.’ Known among evangelicals throughout Italy, these sisters have a ministry of itinerant evangelism in which they encourage congregations to pursue gospel-centered outreach. Their message is simple: ‘Choose Christ and him alone’…By now, Annamaria was ready to leave the Catholic Church. She could no longer celebrate Mass or attend confession, and she had discarded all of her religious paraphernalia such as statues, beads, and clerical attire. (This is evidently when she broke the habit). After 46 years as a nun, she was ready to resign…One thing was left…baptism. On September 25, 2005, Pastors Dick Paul and Sam Wegner baptized them at Bible Christian Church of Florence. Afterward, Cristiana and Annamaria were cut off from fellowship with the sisterhood and alienated from many of their family members. Having served in their order for 102 years combined, they were now on their own for the first time, out from under the protective care of Mother Church. Thankfully, the evangelical church stepped in as Pastor Sam Wegner and the congregation of Bible Christian Church surrounded then with loving support. I asked Cristiana how it felt to undergo baptism knowing that she would face such alienation. She responded without batting an eye, ‘It was joy like I had never felt before!’ Describing the nature of their ministry, Annamaria explained, ‘We visit churches to share our testimony, our love for God’s Word, and the liberation which he has given us in Jesus. It is a privilege to serve the Lord.’” The Gospel Nuns by Chris Castaldo

Interview With the Apostle Paul on the Law
“We have died to the law.
How did we die to the law?
We died to the law through the body of Christ.
For what purpose did we die to the law?
We died to the law so that we would belong to another—to him who has been raised from the dead.
Why did God join us to Christ?
So that we could bear fruit for God.
What kind of fruit will we bear if we are under the law and not united to Christ?
While we were living in the flesh, our sinful passions, aroused by the law, were at work in our members to bear fruit for death.
So we’re not under law?
We are released from the law.
You’re saying we’re dead to the law?
We died to that which held us captive.
What are the results of our death to law?
We now serve in the new way of the Spirit . . .
As opposed to?
. . . the old way of the letter.” An Interview With the Apostle Paul on the Law, Life, and Death by Justin Taylor

Schreiner Answers 40 Questions on the Law
“But if I had to recommend just one book on the topic, it’d be Tom Schreiner’s 40 Questions About Christians and Biblical Law…’Tom provides perhaps the most helpful guide available for 40 of the most difficult questions about Christians and Biblical Law.’ I’ve had an opportunity to read an early draft of the book and would give it my highest recommendation.” Schreiner Answers 40 Questions on Gospel and Law by Justin Taylor

What One Thing Would You Change About Seminary?
“Al Mohler: There is a body of knowledge to be mastered and a set of ministerial skills and practices to be developed, of course, but these do not a minister make. The ministry is a calling, and the most important qualifications for the Christian ministry are spiritual.

Don Carson: I’d make it more integrated.

Jeff Louie: We should teach a course on the understanding and centrality of the gospel to every entering seminarian, then build upon that understanding in the theological, canonical, historical, and practical ministry courses. Too often there is no course on the gospel given in seminary, or it is an elective, or it is a subject relegated to a class on evangelism. This subject should be front and center, and everything else we study should be tied to it and flow from it.

Richard Pratt: The agenda of evangelical seminaries is set primarily by scholars. Professors decide how students will spend their time; they determine students’ priorities; they set the pace. And guess what. Scholars’ agenda seldom match the needs of the church.
Can you imagine what kind of soldiers our nation would have if basic training amounted to reading books, listening to lectures, writing papers, and taking exams? We’d have dead soldiers. The first time a bullet wizzed past their heads on the battlefield, they’d panic. The first explosion they saw would send them running. So, what is basic training for the military? Recruits learn the information they need to know, but this is a relatively small part of their preparation. Most of basic training is devoted to supervised battle simulation. Recruits are put through harrowing emotional and physical stress. They crawl under live bullet fire. They practice hand to hand combat.
If I could wave a magic scepter and change seminary today, I’d turn it into a grueling physical and spiritual experience. I’d find ways to reach academic goals more quickly and effectively and then devote most of the curriculum to supervised battle simulation. I’d put students through endless hours of hands-on service to the sick and dying, physically dangerous evangelism, frequent preaching and teaching the Scriptures, and days on end of fasting and prayer. Seminary would either make them or break them.”

(GG: Jesus’ training of the 12 apostles is a partial model to pastors’ training today. Seminaries tend to over-emphasize something Jesus didn’t: hyper-scholarly details. Jesus emphasized character and ‘how to’ more: faith, love, humility, how to pray, how to evangelize, etc. The Church needs scholars, but scholarship is not a qualification for pastors. Are we making scholars or disciples? Yeah, I know the 2 aren’t mutually exclusive, but what is our emphasis?
I love reading scholars, but never want to preach like most of them write. Good preachers can translate scholar-speak into pew-speak with simple and clear words. Think about this: The smartest Bible teacher who ever lived was able to explain complex doctrinal truths in simple and clear words that even uneducated farmers and fishermen could understand. Go and do likewise.) TGC Asks: What one thing would you change about seminary? by Collin Hansen

Racism Remedy: Justification by Faith
“11.00 a.m. on Sunday morning is the most segregated hour of the American week…I want to suggest that one of the best resources for confronting racism in the Christian church is the Protestant doctrine of justification by faith…justification by faith according to Paul has vertical and horizontal dimensions…While justification by faith certainly answers the question, ‘What must I do to be saved?’ it also answers another question, one seldom asked, ‘Who are the people of God?’… Paul’s formulation of justification by faith took shape in the context of the struggle to legitimize the membership of his Gentile converts in a church under siege from Jewish proselytizers…The horizontal elements of justification by faith are displayed in three key places in Paul’s letters. In Rom. 3.28 Paul states: ‘We reckon a person to be justified by faith without works of law’. Then he asks in Rom. 3.29: ‘Or is God the God of the Jews only? Is he not God of the Gentiles too?’…what is the first implication that Paul draws after this in Eph. 2.11-3.11? Paul gives a majestic discourse about how the dividing wall between Jews and Gentiles has been broken down, how Gentiles attain the citizenship of Israel, and the unity between the races in the new creation that God has ushered in…The argument in Antioch between Paul and Peter described in Gal. 2.11-14 had racial issues at the forefront. Peter ate with Gentiles at the church in Antioch, until certain men from James came. Under duress Peter separated and withdrew from table fellowship with Gentiles…Justification by faith is Paul’s weapon to argue for the unity of the church of Jew and Gentile against those who would divide them, segregate them, or assign some to a second tier status. If we claim to believe and follow what the Apostle Paul taught about justification then: Do we believe that every person is justified by faith in Christ? Or do we believe that God is the God of our race only? Do we believe that we are saved by faith so that the dividing wall between black and white communities has been torn down? Do we walk towards the truth of the gospel concerning the way we treat those of different race, color, and ethnicity at the table of the Lord.
To practice any form of ethnic or racial exclusion means that one either does not understand or does not believe in justification by faith. Let me be clear. The denial of ethic privilege and racial superiority is not merely an implication of justification by faith; rather, it is a core element of the doctrine. They are mutually exclusive because justification constitutes a church of Jew and Gentile, slave and free, male and female, Greek and Barbarian, White and Black, African and Asian. Churches and Christians that practice racial segregation even for pragmatic reasons deny the biblical teaching and the application of the doctrine of justification to the koinonia of the church. Justification is the act whereby God creates a new people, with a new status, in a new covenant, as a foretaste of the new age.” (GG: “Accept one another, then, just as Christ accepted you, in order to bring praise to God” Rom. 15:7) Guest Post: Justification by Faith and Racism by Michael Bird

What the Bible Says About Ministry to the Poor (Summary)
“#1: Don’t Undersell What the Bible Says About the Poor and Social Justice

#2: Don’t Oversell What the Bible Says About the Poor and Social Justice
Just as some Christians are in danger of over-reacting against social justice, other Christians, in an effort be prophetic, run the risk of making the Bible say more about the poor and social justice than it actually does. Here are a few examples of ‘oversell.’

(1) For starters, the alleviation of poverty is simply not the main storyline of Scripture. Some Christians talk like the Bible is almost entirely about the poor, as if the story from Genesis to Revelation is largely the story of God taking the side of the poor in an effort to raise the minimum wage and provide universal health care. As we tried to show earlier, the biblical narrative is chiefly concerned with how a holy God can dwell with an unholy people. Granted, one aspect of living a holy life is treating the poor with compassion and pursuing justice, but this hardly makes poverty the central theme in the Bible. If our story does not center on Jesus Christ, and the story of Jesus Christ does not center on his death and resurrection for sin, we have gotten the story all out of whack.

(2) Likewise, we must remember that the ‘poor’ in Scripture are usually the pious poor. They are the righteous poor, the people of God oppressed by their enemies yet still depending on him to come through on their behalf (see for example Psalm 10; 69; 72; 82). This does not mean “the poor” should be evacuated of any economic component. After all the pious poor are very often the materially poor. But it does mean that the poor God favors are not the slothful poor (Prov. 6:6-11; 2 Thess 3:6-12), nor the disobedient poor (Prov. 30:9), but the humble poor who wait on God (Matthew 5:3; 6:33).

(3) We should note that almost all the references to caring for the poor in the Bible are references to the poor within the covenant community… Christians are enjoined to do good to all people, but the priority is ‘especially to those who are of the household of faith’ (Gal. 6:10).

(4) Justice, as a biblical category, is not synonymous with anything and everything we feel would be good for the world. We are often told that creation care is a justice issue, the gap between rich and poor is a justice issue, advocating for a ‘living wage’ is a justice issue. But the examination of the main social justice texts has shown that justice is a much more prosaic category in the Bible. Doing justice means following the rule of law, showing impartiality, not stealing, not swindling, not taking advantage of the weak because they are too uninformed or unconnected to stop you.” A Brief Wrap Up on The Poor and Social Justice by Kevin DeYoung

Which Motives to Conversion Should Evangelists Use?
“Most of us, I suspect, develop fairly standard ways, one might even say repetitive ways, to appeal to the motivations of our hearers when we preach the gospel. Recently, however, I have wondered if I have erred in this respect—not so much in what I say as in what I never or almost never say…

1. A Survey of Possible Motivations
1.1 Fear
1.2 The Burden of Guilt
1.3 Shame
1.4 The Need for ‘Future Grace’
1.5 The Attractiveness of Truth
1.6 A General, Despairing Sense of Need
1.7 Responding to Grace and Love
1.8 (Hope)

2. Four Theological and Pastoral Reflections on This Survey
2.1 We do not have the right to choose only one of these motivations in people and to appeal to it restrictively.
2.2 On the other hand, we may have the right to emphasize one motivation more than others.
2.3 Nevertheless, the comprehensiveness of our appeal to diverse motivations will reflect the comprehensiveness of our grasp of the gospel.
2.4…failure to cover the sweep of motivations ultimately results in diminishing God.
The point to be made is simple: any failure to appeal to the full range of biblically exemplified and biblically sanctioned motivations not only means that there are some people we are not taking into account, but, more seriously, that there are elements in the character and attributes of God himself that we are almost certainly ignoring.” Pastoral Pensées: Motivations to Appeal to in Our Hearers When We Preach for Conversion by Don Carson

The New Perspective’s False Dichotomies
“Moisés Silva explains why we can be grateful to the “new perspective on Paul: first, for reminding us of what was obvious long before E. P. Sanders’s Paul and Palestinian Judaism came on the scene, namely, that it is quite unfair and inaccurate to paint postbiblical Judaism with the broad, indiscriminate brush of ‘legalism’ and self-righteousness; and second, for helping us to see more clearly that Paul’s overarching interest in Galatians 2-3 was not precisely to expound the doctrine of justification but to address the Jewish-Gentile question in the church and thereby to clarify who are the true descendants of Abraham.
But one exaggeration doesn’t deserve another: But to acknowledge that much is hardly to accept other exaggerated claims—for example, the tendency to seek right-standing with God by human effort was not much of a problem in Judaism (and therefore that such a thing was outside Paul’s purview), or that the doctrine of justification by faith alone, as understood in Protestant theology, does not play a significant role in Galatians 3 (let alone that it was foreign to Pauline thought!).” Gratitude for the New Perspective on Paul but Resistance to Its False Dichotomies by Moises Silva

Blessed Are the Peacemakers
“I would recommend that every church at least be familiar with Peacemaker Ministries and the resources that they offer. I recently had an opportunity to lead a group through their small-group DVD set and study guide, and the feedback was very encouraging, with tangible fruit produced.” Blessed Are the Peacemakers by Justin Taylor

More Christians Than Communists in China?
“No one knows exactly how many Christians there are among China’s population of 1.3 billion. There are an estimated 21 million members of the government sanctioned Three-Self Patriotic movement, but nobody knows how many Protestants worship in unregistered house churches. Some recent surveys have calculated there could be as many as 100 million Chinese Protestants. That would mean that China has more Christians than Communist Party members, which now number 75 million.” NPR on the Chinese Christian Boom by Collin Hansen